New Mortgage Rules Could Make Buying A House Even Harder
The Canadian Real Estate InvestorApril 19, 2024
186
00:42:5939.4 MB

New Mortgage Rules Could Make Buying A House Even Harder

We look at some changes in the mortgage market that could really make things harder

  • 30 year mortgages - will they help?
  • OSFI's new leverage rules for lenders 
  • CRA direct links for your mortgage 

****OFSI has released a new statement since we recorded this episode that this change applies to bank portfolios, not individual portfolios, and we will record and release an updated commentary soon. 

If you have any questions for the show or want to work with Nick and Dan please reach out to them on social media or send an email to tcreipodcast@gmail.com

Sign Up For The Next Webinar Realist 

Attend a Meetups Meetups

Get a Pre Approval G & H Mortgage Group

Get Financing with Landbank LandBank

Nick 

Instagram.com/mybuddynick

tiktok.com/@mybuddynick

twitter.com/mybuddynick89

Dan

twitter.com/daniel_foch 

instagram.com/danielfoch

tiktok.com/@danielfoch

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

[00:00:00] Welcome to the Canadian Real Estate Investor, where hosts Daniel Foch and Nick Hill navigate

[00:00:06] the market and provide the tools and insights to build your real estate portfolio.

[00:00:13] Welcome back to another episode of the Canadian Real Estate Investor podcast.

[00:00:17] My name is Nick Hill and I'm joined today and every Tuesday and Friday by my good friend

[00:00:23] Mr. Daniel Foch.

[00:00:24] Hey!

[00:00:25] Happy to be here.

[00:00:26] Got a handful of really good episodes.

[00:00:28] I feel like we're like in a in a good little flow right now.

[00:00:31] Yeah, so we're just gonna try and keep it up.

[00:00:34] Today, we're going to be talking about buying real estate, which is going to be getting

[00:00:39] a little bit more difficult these days, I think.

[00:00:42] Yes, it is, Dan.

[00:00:45] It's tricky now and unfortunately, it's likely to just get harder.

[00:00:50] In today's episodes, we cover some of the most recent changes and discussions in the

[00:00:56] mortgage space.

[00:00:57] We look at Ausfee's new rules that limit leverage.

[00:01:02] We look at if 30-year amortizations are something that we should be excited about.

[00:01:08] And we talk about a crackdown on mortgage fraud by the Feds by allowing mortgage lenders

[00:01:16] to link directly to the Canada Revenue Agency, otherwise known as the CRA.

[00:01:23] Yeah, so before we do that, there's a lot to discuss, but we would like to kick things

[00:01:31] off on a more positive note since based on what you're describing, it sounds like

[00:01:35] we got a pretty negative episode ahead.

[00:01:36] So, a wonderful review from one of our lovely listeners.

[00:01:40] So if you want to support the show, we would always appreciate if you left us

[00:01:43] a five-star review either on Spotify or Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you're

[00:01:49] listening to this on.

[00:01:50] And if it's on Apple, you can actually type in a cool little note to us.

[00:01:54] One of the other things we really like is if you just take a screenshot of yourself

[00:01:57] listening to the show and tag us and we'll share it on our Instagram.

[00:02:02] And then you can meet other people who listen to the show.

[00:02:05] So we have five stars here from Avangemer.

[00:02:09] Is that right?

[00:02:10] I don't know.

[00:02:11] They put a nice French twang to it.

[00:02:13] Avangemer?

[00:02:15] Right.

[00:02:16] Okay.

[00:02:17] Oh, it's Avangemer.

[00:02:20] Oh, we know who this is.

[00:02:21] Yeah, there you go.

[00:02:22] Thank you.

[00:02:23] Thank you.

[00:02:24] We were just on a call with this lovely gentleman.

[00:02:26] Yeah.

[00:02:27] Awesome listen, it says.

[00:02:29] I don't ever write in to review any podcast, but I felt this one was a little different.

[00:02:34] I constantly look forward to getting new episodes to find out the latest updates

[00:02:37] on the market and the economy.

[00:02:39] And Nick, do a great job breaking down complicated scenarios for everyday

[00:02:43] persons such as myself.

[00:02:45] Keep up the great work guys.

[00:02:47] Can't wait to do a meetup.

[00:02:49] Love to hear it.

[00:02:51] Thank you as always to you and to anyone else that has taken the time

[00:02:57] to write us a review as Dan said.

[00:02:59] Much appreciated.

[00:03:00] I'm glad they took the time to mention meetups as well.

[00:03:03] We had a lot of really good meetups.

[00:03:04] We're going to do a whole episode, I think on meetups, where we have them,

[00:03:06] who's hosting them.

[00:03:08] Who comes out of them, what you should do to prepare for them.

[00:03:10] Yeah.

[00:03:11] What you should do after them.

[00:03:13] How you can get involved.

[00:03:15] Because we do have a new partnership, Coast to Coast, Sherwin Williams

[00:03:18] is sponsoring meetups and I'm sure you've heard their ads on the podcast by now.

[00:03:21] I see this light switch and I want to paint it white.

[00:03:25] Is that what you do?

[00:03:27] That's what every landlord does isn't it?

[00:03:29] That's Rolling Stones paint it black with the landlord remix.

[00:03:33] Amazing.

[00:03:34] Paint it white.

[00:03:35] Amazing.

[00:03:36] Make sure you copyright that.

[00:03:38] That's good.

[00:03:39] That isn't a killer original I think, I don't know.

[00:03:41] Yeah, that is good.

[00:03:42] It's really good.

[00:03:43] Yeah, Sherwin Williams, obviously natural fit here because landlords love painting things.

[00:03:47] We need it.

[00:03:48] Yeah, honestly.

[00:03:50] Biggest ROI.

[00:03:51] Yeah, so if you're a listener and you have a meetup,

[00:03:54] if your meetup group grows to 50 or more people

[00:03:57] and we're seeing an average of 20 plus people going to those meetups,

[00:04:00] Sherwin Williams will come out, they'll bring a bunch of sweet swag.

[00:04:03] We've seen the swag, it's awesome.

[00:04:05] It's cool.

[00:04:06] Very cool.

[00:04:07] Their logo is really cool.

[00:04:08] Yeah.

[00:04:09] And it's basically like the landlord version of the earth.

[00:04:12] Yeah, well I love that they were getting some controversy about their logo

[00:04:16] and they're like, no we're not changing it.

[00:04:18] It's 125 years old, we don't care.

[00:04:20] It's like come on.

[00:04:21] Yeah.

[00:04:22] Love to hear it.

[00:04:23] Yeah, I really excited about the meetup.

[00:04:25] So stay tuned for that episode and we would love to see you out at one.

[00:04:28] They're free, they're full of value.

[00:04:30] We're not trying to sell you anything,

[00:04:32] you connected with other real estate investors

[00:04:35] because that's what you should be doing.

[00:04:36] Listen, if you're not a real estate investor,

[00:04:38] not everyone that goes is an investor.

[00:04:41] We've got contractors.

[00:04:42] Yeah, we've kind of changed them to like real estate meetups now as well

[00:04:45] because I find like there's a lot of like investors slash realtors,

[00:04:48] a lot of people in the profession that go...

[00:04:50] Just people involved in the industry that are looking to,

[00:04:53] you know gain more exposure to other people in the industry, right?

[00:04:56] Yeah.

[00:04:57] And we are trying to sell you something.

[00:04:58] We're trying to sell you on going to another meetup.

[00:05:00] Yeah.

[00:05:01] Hard sell here.

[00:05:02] Yeah.

[00:05:03] Anyway, Nick, we digress as is tradition.

[00:05:05] As usual, yeah.

[00:05:06] Let's get into the changes that we are about to see

[00:05:10] in the mortgage market day.

[00:05:12] And the first piece we're going to look at is

[00:05:14] the office of the superintendent of financial institutions,

[00:05:20] OSPY, which is Canada's bank regulator.

[00:05:23] If you listen to the show, you've probably heard them

[00:05:26] come up once or twice in conversation.

[00:05:28] So they are getting ahead of any rate cuts,

[00:05:32] which in some people's schedule are late by now,

[00:05:36] with new limits on leverage.

[00:05:39] So OSPY notified lender to prepare for a new loan to income.

[00:05:44] That's LTI, loan to income rule.

[00:05:47] The new rule will limit federally regulated financial institutions.

[00:05:53] That's FRFIs.

[00:05:56] I think that's a new initialism here on the show.

[00:05:58] We call those FRFIs.

[00:05:59] FRFIs, there we go.

[00:06:01] Mortgage portfolios to a multiple of the income used to service those loans.

[00:06:06] OSPY says the new limits are designed to help limit a buildup

[00:06:12] of risky leverage during low interest rate periods.

[00:06:16] Sound familiar whatsoever, Dan?

[00:06:19] Yeah.

[00:06:20] I mean, it seems like they're trying to lean in a little bit on rate cuts,

[00:06:24] which you mentioned, like, you know, as rates start coming down,

[00:06:27] they want to make sure people don't just start piling on debt again

[00:06:29] because we kind of ran into a bit of an issue there.

[00:06:32] So on the rate cuts piece, because you mentioned that a little bit

[00:06:36] at the beginning of your beautiful monologue there,

[00:06:39] inflation is now, it came in today, April 16th,

[00:06:42] when we're recording this came out this morning

[00:06:45] that inflation went up again marginally,

[00:06:48] like went up from 2.8% to 2.9%.

[00:06:51] But that's the wrong direction, and we're still on the upper bound

[00:06:53] of that two to three range that the Bank of Canada talks about.

[00:06:56] And the US is, their job numbers are strong,

[00:06:59] their inflation's strong.

[00:07:01] Bit of a different story down there.

[00:07:03] I mean, I listen to Brandon and Samo talk about this a lot,

[00:07:05] and Samo especially when he's in regards to his macro,

[00:07:08] like I think his macro view is really good.

[00:07:10] And he's sort of of the opinion that if we don't see a cut

[00:07:13] like in the next month or two, or like basically by June,

[00:07:16] then we probably won't see one until after the election.

[00:07:19] And this is where it becomes a problem for the Bank of Canada

[00:07:22] because obviously Canadians are suffering a lot more than consumers

[00:07:25] in the US it seems.

[00:07:27] We have mortgage delinquency rates rising,

[00:07:29] bankruptcies rising, et cetera.

[00:07:31] So I think the Bank of Canada probably ought to be

[00:07:33] a little bit more of a hurry to cut.

[00:07:37] Yeah.

[00:07:38] Yeah.

[00:07:39] I mean, and they're, in theory,

[00:07:42] we're supposed to be kind of in lockstep with the Fed at this point.

[00:07:45] But we might be pushed to make a very tough decision.

[00:07:49] The challenge is like another one.

[00:07:51] If they cut, then like you have to think of the interest rate

[00:07:54] as like the rate of return on currency.

[00:07:56] So if Canada cuts our interest rate,

[00:07:58] then our currency becomes less valuable,

[00:08:00] which means that people are less likely to buy it,

[00:08:02] which means that man,

[00:08:03] that it gets devalued against the US dollar.

[00:08:06] And then now you've got imported inflation

[00:08:08] because we're importing a ton of,

[00:08:10] there are largest trading partner,

[00:08:11] most everything that we buy from it.

[00:08:13] Other places in the world comes into USD

[00:08:15] and now all of a sudden goods start to cost more.

[00:08:17] So it's a very fine line.

[00:08:18] I'm not, I'm glad I'm not Tiff MacLum.

[00:08:20] Speaking of our money becoming worthless,

[00:08:24] holy man, I, so I'm very lucky I'm headed to...

[00:08:28] Did you leave the house the other day for the first time?

[00:08:30] I'm headed to Italy tonight,

[00:08:33] which is very exciting.

[00:08:34] Don't worry, podcasts are still going to come out.

[00:08:36] We don't miss.

[00:08:37] Nick's just going to be speaking Italian.

[00:08:38] Yes.

[00:08:40] We went and exchanged $1,500 for euros yesterday.

[00:08:45] Didn't even crack a thousand dollars.

[00:08:48] $980, 980 euros, sorry for 1500 bucks.

[00:08:54] So man, tough times to be the Canadian,

[00:08:58] bad day to be a Canadian dollar.

[00:08:59] Yeah.

[00:09:00] Anyway, so you're probably wondering or asking

[00:09:03] what does this actually mean going back

[00:09:05] to the mortgage piece and off-seed?

[00:09:07] Well, mortgage portfolios will soon be limited

[00:09:10] to 4.5 times borrower income in a quarter.

[00:09:15] Only a small share will be allowed to exceed that limit.

[00:09:18] And that is designed to reduce portfolio risk.

[00:09:23] Sounds like a pretty good thing.

[00:09:24] The loan to income, the LTI measure we are implementing

[00:09:30] in a portfolio test is designed to prevent

[00:09:33] the buildup of highly leveraged loans

[00:09:35] during low interest rates period, rate periods.

[00:09:38] And that is from a spokesperson at OSPV.

[00:09:41] Yeah.

[00:09:42] I think you're going to tell me a little bit

[00:09:44] about what these loan to income ratios actually are.

[00:09:47] Yeah, so I just wanted to read this tweet

[00:09:51] from Daniel Weiner who's a friend of mine.

[00:09:53] He helps me with the Twitter spaces

[00:09:54] and great follow on Twitter.

[00:09:56] He's a mortgage broker, mostly in the private space.

[00:09:58] You know other mortgage brokers?

[00:09:59] Yeah, I know.

[00:10:00] I'm sorry.

[00:10:01] Yeah, he said today,

[00:10:03] OSPV clarified their stance on loan to income limits,

[00:10:07] portfolio level not individual.

[00:10:09] So this is interesting, right?

[00:10:10] So if you're an investor,

[00:10:12] this is going to be a big headwind, right?

[00:10:15] And this is really trying to bring down

[00:10:17] some of that leverage on retail investors.

[00:10:20] The idea is to prevent mass leveraging

[00:10:22] at different lenders.

[00:10:23] So you'll actually need to show what your entire

[00:10:25] loan to income like is across your whole portfolio.

[00:10:29] Now OSPV I think is like this regulation

[00:10:32] really only applies to your A lenders,

[00:10:35] let's call it, so your banks,

[00:10:37] charter banks.

[00:10:38] Yeah.

[00:10:39] And...

[00:10:40] Who do quite a few mortgages by the way.

[00:10:42] Yeah, but so this could push more to B side.

[00:10:45] It includes first, second mortgages

[00:10:48] and HELOCs on both your owner occupied

[00:10:51] and your rental.

[00:10:52] So again like for people who have bigger portfolios,

[00:10:55] it's not that...

[00:10:57] Like I don't think renewal is going to be

[00:10:59] an issue because it does exclude

[00:11:01] insured loans and renewals,

[00:11:03] which is probably a good thing

[00:11:04] because it's kind of taking away

[00:11:05] some of the excess buying power

[00:11:09] for investors against like a first-time home buyer

[00:11:11] who would be using an insured mortgage

[00:11:13] and reallocating that to...

[00:11:15] Just taking away that investor buying power

[00:11:17] and reallocating it to first-time buyers

[00:11:19] because they have renewed mortgages

[00:11:21] and so they don't...

[00:11:22] Or sorry, insured mortgages

[00:11:23] and so they wouldn't be capped by this.

[00:11:25] Anyway, so it's important to note that

[00:11:27] OSPV's role is to ensure functioning

[00:11:28] in sound financial systems.

[00:11:30] So they're not to protect individuals

[00:11:32] from risk or to tell fry fries

[00:11:35] which clients are too risky.

[00:11:37] However, generally speaking, a borrower

[00:11:38] is considered over-leveraged

[00:11:40] if their loan exceeds 450% of income

[00:11:43] but OSPV is eliminating excess leverage,

[00:11:45] not over-leveraged borrowers.

[00:11:47] Institutions are just being asked

[00:11:49] to balance their risk, right?

[00:11:51] Sounds fair.

[00:11:52] Yeah.

[00:11:53] The new rule is one of many being rolled out

[00:11:55] to reduce public exposure to private debt

[00:11:57] since the global financial crisis,

[00:11:59] global regulators have been working together

[00:12:01] to better quantify risk which has led to

[00:12:03] tighter lending especially when it comes

[00:12:05] to real estate investors which was a big

[00:12:07] issue when it came down to

[00:12:09] the market in the US and I know

[00:12:11] I think this couple paragraphs

[00:12:13] came from better dwelling and I know

[00:12:15] Steven Pinwasi has a really good thread

[00:12:17] on Twitter about how

[00:12:19] the investors kind of

[00:12:21] led that big down leg

[00:12:23] in that US crash.

[00:12:25] Yeah.

[00:12:26] Yeah.

[00:12:28] So at this point you might be

[00:12:30] wondering what we're talking about.

[00:12:32] We've already gone over what it means

[00:12:34] but why is this happening?

[00:12:36] That's the next question we're going to answer.

[00:12:38] The change is one if a series

[00:12:40] of expected adjustments

[00:12:42] to mortgage guidelines.

[00:12:44] Aussie says that the new portfolio test

[00:12:46] is intended to again

[00:12:48] prevent the buildup of highly

[00:12:50] levered loans during low

[00:12:52] interest rate periods.

[00:12:54] The regulator is particularly concerned about

[00:12:56] loans that are more than

[00:12:58] 4.5 times borrower

[00:13:00] income because they

[00:13:02] raise the probability

[00:13:04] of that borrower defaulting

[00:13:06] and increase a lender's potential

[00:13:08] losses. Two things we

[00:13:10] would like to avoid.

[00:13:12] And we saw this in real time.

[00:13:14] If you've been listening to the show we've been covering

[00:13:16] this for a long time. Remember the

[00:13:18] prolonged period of low interest

[00:13:20] rates that lasted way too

[00:13:22] long only then to go into

[00:13:24] another period in time

[00:13:26] where we experienced a

[00:13:28] very steep increase

[00:13:30] that was back in the spring of 2022.

[00:13:32] Now it's a lot easier to

[00:13:34] manage lots of debt

[00:13:36] in a low rate environment because

[00:13:38] simply the debt doesn't cost you that much

[00:13:40] but it becomes a lot

[00:13:42] more challenging for

[00:13:44] borrowers when rates rise

[00:13:46] and keep rising

[00:13:48] and then stay high.

[00:13:50] Yeah so it is interesting

[00:13:52] I'm looking at

[00:13:54] the Bank of Canada

[00:13:56] page that's indicators of

[00:13:58] financial vulnerabilities

[00:14:00] and they have

[00:14:02] this loan to income chart

[00:14:04] it actually shows loan to income ratio

[00:14:06] by and so share of new mortgages

[00:14:08] with an LTI loan to income ratio above

[00:14:10] 450% and you can see

[00:14:12] basically after 2022

[00:14:14] Q1 once rate hike started it fell off

[00:14:16] of a cliff. And it's not just because

[00:14:18] people are like de-risking and being like oh

[00:14:20] you know this is smart it's because

[00:14:22] interest rates are so high that they can't

[00:14:24] so right now the GDS and TDS

[00:14:26] ratio and the debt service coverage

[00:14:28] ratio on real estate investments so these are

[00:14:30] measures of your debt like

[00:14:32] the ability to service debt

[00:14:34] maybe we'll do a quick refresher on them after I

[00:14:36] read this next part of the article but

[00:14:38] basically those things are

[00:14:40] capping like those are what's limiting

[00:14:42] people's ability to get over 4.5x

[00:14:44] ratio

[00:14:46] right? Because that 450%

[00:14:48] LTI ratio over 450%

[00:14:50] is that 4.5x

[00:14:52] income and so

[00:14:54] the goal would be as rates come down which we just

[00:14:56] talked about rate cuts is to make sure that

[00:14:58] this line stays low

[00:15:00] the challenges from my

[00:15:02] perspective is like this is it's not just like

[00:15:04] limiting retail investors and

[00:15:06] making it hard to own a portfolio

[00:15:08] or

[00:15:10] scale a portfolio because you're capped based on

[00:15:12] loan to income

[00:15:14] it also kind of pushes you to more expensive debt

[00:15:16] if you want to scale right?

[00:15:18] So I don't know if it actually

[00:15:20] makes it clear

[00:15:22] their goal isn't to remove risk on

[00:15:24] you and I the investor their goal is

[00:15:26] to remove risk on the lenders and the financial

[00:15:28] system so which is kind of

[00:15:30] the main infrastructure that the country

[00:15:32] is built on

[00:15:34] so that's okay and I think

[00:15:36] that major

[00:15:38] financial institutions should have less

[00:15:40] risk and if individual investors want

[00:15:42] to take more risk then by all means do that

[00:15:44] and you ask for a quick refresher so before

[00:15:46] you go on I'm just going to quickly go

[00:15:48] over gross debt service and total debt

[00:15:50] service which we've covered many times in

[00:15:52] the podcast in a lot of the mortgage episodes

[00:15:54] so if you want more info on this go back

[00:15:56] and seek some of those out but

[00:15:58] GDS is the percentage

[00:16:00] of your monthly household income

[00:16:02] that covers your housing costs

[00:16:04] and it must not exceed

[00:16:06] 39%

[00:16:08] TDS total debt service

[00:16:10] is the percentage of your monthly household income

[00:16:12] that covers your

[00:16:14] housing costs and

[00:16:16] your other debts and it must not exceed

[00:16:18] 44%

[00:16:20] now Dan give me a quick reminder of

[00:16:22] what a debt service coverage ratio is

[00:16:24] yeah so the DSCR

[00:16:26] the DSCR as we're calling it the

[00:16:28] disker and

[00:16:30] it's basically the same

[00:16:32] it's debt service coverage ratio so I don't know

[00:16:34] if I said that but it's basically the same thing

[00:16:36] that you just described GDS and TDS but for

[00:16:38] an investment property and so

[00:16:40] it's a measure of the cash flow available to pay

[00:16:42] current debt obligations and it measures

[00:16:44] the properties cash flow versus its debt

[00:16:46] so basically just literally your cash flow

[00:16:48] divided by your debt

[00:16:50] lenders use the DSCR to determine whether

[00:16:52] business has enough net

[00:16:54] operating income to pay back its loans

[00:16:56] on a monthly basis so if your rent is

[00:16:58] I'll just

[00:17:00] if your rent is $1250 a month and your debt

[00:17:02] should be $1000 a month because

[00:17:04] usually they want to see a 1.25

[00:17:06] debt service coverage ratio in today's market

[00:17:08] okay so back to the article

[00:17:10] so we know what this is and why it's happening

[00:17:12] I guess the next question is will the test apply

[00:17:14] to borrowers like

[00:17:16] the qualifying stress test

[00:17:18] and the answer is no the portfolio test

[00:17:20] does not create a new hurdle for the

[00:17:22] individual home buyer trying to qualify

[00:17:24] for a mortgage loan instead

[00:17:26] it will track the bank's

[00:17:28] uninsured mortgages portfolios

[00:17:30] this measure does not apply to

[00:17:32] any one person as we said in the March

[00:17:34] 2022 statement it applies to the

[00:17:36] institution's portfolio of underwritten mortgages

[00:17:38] that originate that quarter

[00:17:40] and it needs to be managed by the institution

[00:17:42] mortgage strategist

[00:17:44] rob Mcclister said there will be

[00:17:46] no prohibition on an individual

[00:17:48] taking on a mortgage if the loan exceeds

[00:17:50] their income by more than

[00:17:52] 4.5 times even with

[00:17:54] a new test banks could allow

[00:17:56] an individual borrower to exceed the cap

[00:17:58] so long as the entire portfolio

[00:18:00] averaged 4.5 times

[00:18:02] or less he said

[00:18:04] exactly and so in conclusion

[00:18:06] how much of an impact will this

[00:18:08] new test have on the market

[00:18:10] well probably not much

[00:18:12] at first and again that's according to

[00:18:14] the gentleman

[00:18:16] that mortgage strategist that Dan

[00:18:18] just mentioned rob Mcclister

[00:18:20] but it will

[00:18:22] be felt once interest rates

[00:18:24] start to come down because the stress test

[00:18:26] for individual borrowers will carry a lower

[00:18:28] qualifying rate meaning

[00:18:30] the borrower will qualify

[00:18:32] for a larger mortgage

[00:18:34] and that means that loan

[00:18:36] to income ratios will go up

[00:18:38] still Mcclister said

[00:18:40] there will be many borrowers out there

[00:18:42] who won't exceed

[00:18:44] a loan of 4.5

[00:18:46] times income especially if they have already

[00:18:48] paid down a chunk of their mortgage

[00:18:50] and renewed this will bring down

[00:18:52] the overall ratio applied to the banks

[00:18:54] portfolio and allow them

[00:18:56] to make more high

[00:18:58] leverage loans so

[00:19:00] interesting stuff there

[00:19:02] Dan any final points here before we move on

[00:19:04] to next topic which

[00:19:06] is 30 year AMS

[00:19:08] yeah so I think that this is really

[00:19:10] a good

[00:19:12] point for us because we teach

[00:19:14] people how to make money in real estate

[00:19:16] and how to scale portfolios and we've been saying for a long time

[00:19:18] that you have to

[00:19:20] focus on income

[00:19:22] first as an investor everybody

[00:19:24] thinks about capital appreciation as your way

[00:19:26] to scale right through like I'm just

[00:19:28] going to buy this property and then it's going to go up in

[00:19:30] value and pull the equity out and I'm going to buy

[00:19:32] another one and that worked for a really long

[00:19:34] time but the reality is you

[00:19:36] literally based on this you will not

[00:19:38] be able to do that any longer

[00:19:40] and so it has never been

[00:19:42] more important to focus

[00:19:44] on portfolio income

[00:19:46] especially portfolio income relative to the

[00:19:48] price that you're paying how do we measure that

[00:19:50] cap rates a good way to do it right

[00:19:52] every deal that you get

[00:19:54] should bring you closer to doing the next deal

[00:19:56] in an environment where income

[00:19:58] is going to be the limiting factor because you

[00:20:00] now can only scale your portfolio to 4.5

[00:20:02] times income how do we increase

[00:20:04] the amount we can scale

[00:20:06] our portfolio by scaling our income

[00:20:08] not anything else

[00:20:10] the equity isn't going to matter anymore the income

[00:20:12] is going to be the limiting factor your portfolio can only

[00:20:14] ever get 4.5

[00:20:16] times the size of the income so

[00:20:18] if you're buying a property it would have to

[00:20:20] increase your income like you can go increase

[00:20:22] your income on your own go do a better job at your job

[00:20:24] go get a high paying job whatever

[00:20:26] yeah but if your

[00:20:28] investments can also increase your income

[00:20:30] every time you buy one and you have positive

[00:20:32] cash flow and it's increasing your income

[00:20:34] it's going to get you closer to doing another deal

[00:20:36] because it's bringing that income up and you

[00:20:38] can buy 4.5 times that income so

[00:20:40] every time you bring your income up you actually

[00:20:42] get a 4.5x increase

[00:20:44] on your buying power hypothetically right

[00:20:46] because we know that's now the cap

[00:20:48] and that's the exact kind of stuff as you mentioned

[00:20:50] Dan that's the kind of stuff we teach we teach that

[00:20:52] course yeah we've been saying this for a while

[00:20:54] like we know how to analyze this stuff

[00:20:56] we've always been looking at deals this way

[00:20:58] fortunately the policy environment is moving

[00:21:00] more in favor of us I mean there's a

[00:21:02] lot of courses out there on flipping

[00:21:04] on wholesaling and stuff like that

[00:21:06] we're not those kind of guys you know

[00:21:08] that this is the Canadian real estate investor

[00:21:10] podcast not the Canadian real estate flipper

[00:21:12] podcast not the Canadian real estate wholesaler

[00:21:14] podcast right yeah I mean this is

[00:21:16] investing we invest for a yield it's not

[00:21:18] a speculation show this is investing

[00:21:20] investing and investing

[00:21:22] and what we do if your portfolio

[00:21:24] isn't performing

[00:21:26] its highest and best use is what we'll do is we'll

[00:21:28] audit it for you right I mean

[00:21:30] if your existing stuff

[00:21:32] isn't cash flowing and we need it to

[00:21:34] cash flow in order to help you

[00:21:36] scale which is becoming more and more evident

[00:21:38] then what we do is we go

[00:21:40] property by property look at the highest

[00:21:42] and best use of that property look at if you're

[00:21:44] getting as much money but look at your debt terms

[00:21:46] your debt structure capital stack everything

[00:21:48] so anyways all that is in the

[00:21:50] no it's good like I think

[00:21:52] it's worth discussing because a lot of like

[00:21:54] just so other people like people realize

[00:21:56] there's other people out there in these positions

[00:21:58] myself included a lot of the coaching

[00:22:00] calls in the course have been focused

[00:22:02] on portfolio strategy

[00:22:04] right on optimization on taking

[00:22:06] income and this is before

[00:22:08] this really came out we've really just

[00:22:10] been focused on looking at

[00:22:12] someone's portfolio and saying

[00:22:14] hey here's where we can

[00:22:16] increase income right can we put a basement suite in here

[00:22:18] can we put a garden suite in here it's going to

[00:22:20] be worth the cost because you know we can refi

[00:22:22] it out and it'll increase the income

[00:22:24] which will get you closer this is before this rule even

[00:22:26] came in now this rule came in all of

[00:22:28] these rules that we've really been doing

[00:22:30] and I'm looking at my portfolio the same way

[00:22:32] with the cabin like I mentioned

[00:22:34] we have the there's a basement

[00:22:36] suite in that building that still needs to be

[00:22:38] rented out

[00:22:40] I have a vacant basement suite in a

[00:22:42] building that I'm gonna be renovating to put it in

[00:22:44] increasing the revenue potential

[00:22:46] of existing of your existing

[00:22:48] portfolio now is going to be

[00:22:50] very important

[00:22:52] and so right now we're in it we're really in

[00:22:54] as a phase of investors and I think

[00:22:56] the government's been making this clear with policy

[00:22:58] we just had both the housing

[00:23:00] minister and shadow housing minister

[00:23:02] on to discuss this

[00:23:04] they see the role of investors but the reality

[00:23:06] is the central banks have made it as such that

[00:23:08] you can't cash flow

[00:23:10] a single family

[00:23:12] residential property except in like maybe 10

[00:23:14] cities in Canada really right

[00:23:16] so what does this mean does this mean we shouldn't be buying

[00:23:18] single family residential properties maybe

[00:23:20] maybe those should be reserved for owner occupiers

[00:23:22] but the other

[00:23:24] pieces you can cash flow

[00:23:26] a two unit or three year in it or four unit

[00:23:28] and so policy makers know

[00:23:30] they can rely on investors

[00:23:32] to create housing if

[00:23:34] things stay the way that they are

[00:23:36] and this is a very

[00:23:38] very important thing to acknowledge right now I think

[00:23:40] in today's environment is

[00:23:42] their expectation of us is to be housing creators

[00:23:44] and that's just becoming more apparent by things like this

[00:23:46] yeah now really well said

[00:23:48] now that's very important

[00:23:50] now let's

[00:23:52] move on to something that may

[00:23:54] or may not be

[00:23:56] important

[00:23:58] so 30 year amortization which is

[00:24:00] like this one's funny because it's like

[00:24:02] selective 30 year amortization I actually don't

[00:24:04] think this policy is going to do that much but anyway 30

[00:24:06] year amortization let's talk about it

[00:24:08] I'm not sure the amortization period is the length

[00:24:10] of time required to pay off

[00:24:12] your mortgage balance in full

[00:24:14] through regular payments the

[00:24:16] most common

[00:24:18] mortgage amortization

[00:24:20] in Canada

[00:24:22] 25 years that's the standard

[00:24:24] yeah so

[00:24:26] the

[00:24:28] I guess we're extending or giving the opportunity

[00:24:30] to try and

[00:24:32] push that I think it is crazy that everybody

[00:24:34] keeps like topping up to 25 even if

[00:24:36] like that's just funny from my perspective

[00:24:38] you get an infinite mortgage right every time you renew

[00:24:40] like if 25 is the most common it is kind of

[00:24:42] wow anyway so recently

[00:24:44] finance minister mr. Christia Freeland announced

[00:24:46] the federal government will allow 30 year amortization

[00:24:48] periods on insured mortgages for first time home buyers

[00:24:50] purchasing newly built homes and that

[00:24:52] change is said to take

[00:24:54] affect August 1st here's the catch

[00:24:56] from my perspective actually

[00:24:58] you say the down payment and then

[00:25:00] I'll mention the catch yeah so

[00:25:02] under the current

[00:25:04] rules of a down payment is less than 20%

[00:25:06] of the home price the longest

[00:25:08] allowable amortization

[00:25:10] that's again the length

[00:25:12] of time the borough has to repay the mortgage is

[00:25:14] going back 25 years

[00:25:16] which is the most common

[00:25:18] amount of time we see

[00:25:20] across the board yeah so

[00:25:22] as pointed out on

[00:25:24] Twitter and Instagram

[00:25:26] by friends of the show Riley Boyko

[00:25:28] on instead I think but Peter

[00:25:30] Curious Opolis I hope I said that right that's pretty good

[00:25:32] when Riley

[00:25:34] and I he reposted

[00:25:36] it with someone saying yep underneath

[00:25:38] that was me so Riley's

[00:25:40] got some really great takes Riley and Peter both

[00:25:42] incredible real estate agents really

[00:25:44] guys as well so I know they both listen

[00:25:46] to show so thanks fellas yeah no great

[00:25:48] guys so I guess

[00:25:50] the point here is that

[00:25:52] when you buy a brand new home so this only applies

[00:25:54] to brand new houses and when you buy

[00:25:56] a brand new home you're typically putting in a

[00:25:58] deposit of more than 20%

[00:26:00] or up to 20%

[00:26:02] not 5 or 10 or

[00:26:04] 15 and so

[00:26:06] the likelihood of you being both a

[00:26:08] high loan-to-value

[00:26:10] mortgage borrower

[00:26:12] right like an insured mortgage borrower

[00:26:14] and a new home buyer

[00:26:16] is very small unless

[00:26:18] builders are now going to

[00:26:20] unless there's some sort of policy measure where builders are now going to take smaller deposits

[00:26:24] which I don't see how they're gonna do that

[00:26:26] how would they do that in this

[00:26:28] environment I mean maybe right

[00:26:30] it could be creative stuff

[00:26:32] for some builders and developers to come up with

[00:26:34] it's tough to say because builders typically

[00:26:36] will put something called a west mount guarantee

[00:26:38] like an insurance on

[00:26:40] if you just go on west mount guarantees

[00:26:42] website they say like they allow builders

[00:26:44] to access that equity so they

[00:26:46] insure those deposits and then they allow builders

[00:26:48] to access that equity to

[00:26:50] put it to work in project financing so it becomes

[00:26:52] part of the capital stack anyway

[00:26:54] I think I've sufficiently covered

[00:26:56] why this might not do anything so anyway

[00:26:58] faced with a shortage of housing options

[00:27:00] and increasingly high

[00:27:02] rent and home prices younger Canadians

[00:27:04] understandably feel like the deck is stacked against them

[00:27:06] the finance ministers said in a news release

[00:27:08] by extending amortization monthly

[00:27:10] mortgage payments will be more affordable

[00:27:12] for young Canadians who want that first

[00:27:14] home on their own I think I'd calculated

[00:27:16] that all like a one million dollar mortgage it would be like 10% cheaper

[00:27:18] okay so I mean

[00:27:20] that makes a difference it's funny because

[00:27:22] it makes a difference but

[00:27:24] all it does is it makes it like it makes it

[00:27:26] so that you can stretch your payment which means that you're going to buy

[00:27:28] more house and take on more debt maybe you're not

[00:27:30] going to but like that's that's

[00:27:32] typically the net effect right and so it's

[00:27:34] not necessarily like an affordability

[00:27:36] thing I know a lot of builders

[00:27:38] have really been pushing for this but anyway

[00:27:40] MPC mortgage professionals Canada

[00:27:42] CEO Lauren Vandenberg called it

[00:27:44] a step in the right direction and said

[00:27:46] extending the amortization period

[00:27:48] will help level the playing

[00:27:50] field for first time home buyers

[00:27:52] but we have seen blatant decline

[00:27:54] in the ability for first time home buyers to get into the housing market

[00:27:56] we just posted a chart

[00:27:58] on Instagram about it although

[00:28:00] there's a little bit of a chart crime because it looks

[00:28:02] like like first time home buyers are basically

[00:28:04] like buying negative houses but if you actually

[00:28:06] look at this on the bank of Canada website

[00:28:08] where in which they also committed to chart crime

[00:28:10] by the way because they use different axes

[00:28:12] to make it look like the first time home buyers are the lowest

[00:28:14] group of buyers in the market

[00:28:16] first time home buyers are like 47% of the market

[00:28:18] so it's not like they're

[00:28:20] and I just got an argument with John Pesales on Twitter about this

[00:28:22] like I love to debate him because he's very smart

[00:28:24] and sometimes I agree

[00:28:26] with him but I just do it for fun

[00:28:28] so he was like why should we be

[00:28:30] why won't anybody

[00:28:32] or why is everyone against putting

[00:28:34] regulations on investors and not

[00:28:36] against putting regulations on first time home buyers

[00:28:38] right and to me it's like

[00:28:40] this is my actually

[00:28:42] you read your part of the script here

[00:28:44] and have this article and then I'm gonna

[00:28:46] I'm gonna pull up what I wrote in my response to him

[00:28:48] because I feel like it was pretty good. I was gonna say why don't I just jump to the end here

[00:28:50] you pull up your response and

[00:28:52] we'll finish off with that because I don't have much to say

[00:28:54] I mean I was gonna go through insured and uninsured

[00:28:56] stuff but you know

[00:28:58] I agree that I don't think it's gonna change

[00:29:00] the game what it'll do is a longer

[00:29:02] amortization as you said will make homes

[00:29:04] a little bit in theory

[00:29:06] more affordable by reducing that monthly payment

[00:29:08] but likely not much and I mean

[00:29:10] I think it's again as you said

[00:29:12] but it's not making the house more affordable this is the thing that people are like

[00:29:14] making the payment

[00:29:16] exactly that doesn't make housing more affordable

[00:29:18] no it actually might make housing go

[00:29:20] up in price it is inflationary

[00:29:22] typically when you extend the debt and make

[00:29:24] remove a barrier to entry it is just becoming

[00:29:26] more inflationary you pay a little bit less for

[00:29:28] a bigger thing for longer and

[00:29:30] not only just that but

[00:29:32] it's very very specific as you said right first

[00:29:34] time home buyers that are only buying

[00:29:36] new construction now in

[00:29:38] DC and Ontario

[00:29:40] that likely isn't a lot of people

[00:29:42] now it might have a

[00:29:44] better and better effect

[00:29:46] on first-time home buyers in other provinces

[00:29:48] so you know we'll see

[00:29:50] I think this is

[00:29:52] I think this has to be implemented to see what kind of changes

[00:29:54] it'll actually have

[00:29:56] in the market but stay tuned

[00:29:58] I'm sure we'll be covering it as it evolves

[00:30:00] Dan hit me with your piece

[00:30:02] and then let's

[00:30:04] move on to the final piece

[00:30:06] so John he posted

[00:30:08] he reposted the chart

[00:30:10] that we posted and it said

[00:30:12] interesting thing about this when virtually

[00:30:14] every housing expert in Canada are used against measures

[00:30:16] to curb investors buying

[00:30:18] homes they're telling you that

[00:30:20] they support this trend for your homes for

[00:30:22] first-time buyers why do many

[00:30:24] housing experts support this or why do so many

[00:30:26] housing experts support this and I answered

[00:30:28] well so first of all I

[00:30:30] my first answer was personally I think we need to differentiate between speculation and investment for housing creation

[00:30:34] I think there's nothing wrong with

[00:30:36] the latter which is investment for housing creation

[00:30:38] speculators should

[00:30:40] have measures against them but as it appears today the central bank has done a lot of that work

[00:30:44] from my perspective right Bank of Canada pretty much

[00:30:46] stifled any speculation left in

[00:30:48] the market and I said I also think the

[00:30:50] central bank has made this is what I was just mentioning to you

[00:30:52] I also think the central bank has made it such

[00:30:54] that you can't cash flow a single

[00:30:56] family now which means

[00:30:58] investors have to multiplex which is a good thing

[00:31:00] so in that regard I think

[00:31:02] monetary policy is alone

[00:31:04] should be the only policy lever here

[00:31:06] and he just responded by saying the fact

[00:31:08] that the vast majority of the investors

[00:31:10] the fact is the vast majority of these investors are

[00:31:12] not creating housing they're just sitting on land and I said

[00:31:14] so they're speculators then because that's what

[00:31:16] he's describing from my perspective so

[00:31:18] but anyway

[00:31:20] the next piece and this is the actual argument

[00:31:22] specifically against first-time home buyers is

[00:31:24] my thought on this

[00:31:26] first-time home buyers are the irrational

[00:31:28] consumer right so it's to me

[00:31:30] it this is like a protect the innocent

[00:31:32] thing honestly

[00:31:34] they have first-time home buyers have literally zero experience

[00:31:36] their first time like that's I'm not

[00:31:38] making fun of them it literally is their first

[00:31:40] time they have zero experience doing this they've never

[00:31:42] bought and sold the home right they don't they've never been

[00:31:44] through a market cycle in most cases

[00:31:46] and they're more likely to hire a professional

[00:31:48] with the same experience

[00:31:50] none or not enough

[00:31:52] they are also the

[00:31:54] highest leverage consumer right

[00:31:56] meaning they're them at the most

[00:31:58] at risk to a downturn

[00:32:00] to me this is a deadly combination right no

[00:32:02] experience highest risk so

[00:32:04] giving them guardrails probably has a

[00:32:06] better social benefit and makes more sense

[00:32:08] than giving guardrails to investors

[00:32:10] right shouldn't we protect the innocent consumer

[00:32:12] here it's like why do we put

[00:32:14] like you know little bumpers on

[00:32:16] tables for babies right like

[00:32:18] because adults aren't going to go around bopping their heads

[00:32:20] off tables right the babies are the

[00:32:22] innocent kids who don't know better

[00:32:24] so invest and then my other thought is if

[00:32:26] investors are so bad right if they are to be

[00:32:28] demonized by everyone in the market

[00:32:30] shouldn't we be happy to see them

[00:32:32] being the unregulated ones taking all of the risk

[00:32:34] and getting smoked which they are a lot

[00:32:36] of the speculators are doing that right now

[00:32:38] right and first time home buyers aren't because

[00:32:40] they're insured and they were capped so hard

[00:32:42] like there was

[00:32:44] a lot of risk regulated out of first time

[00:32:46] home buyers that wasn't regulated out

[00:32:48] of investors and investors are now the ones

[00:32:50] bag holding suffering right cash flow

[00:32:52] negative etc anyway

[00:32:54] that's my whole meditation

[00:32:56] on the awesome it's a really great take

[00:32:58] I tend to get I was just sitting here thinking

[00:33:00] a bunch of different funny analogies

[00:33:02] for

[00:33:04] protecting innocent first time home buyers

[00:33:06] versus the well it's just protect the innocent

[00:33:08] that's a thing like that's a hundred percent

[00:33:10] that sounds like an idiot

[00:33:12] that's a dance horse original I don't think so

[00:33:14] let's let's keep moving on Dan we got

[00:33:16] one more thing to talk about

[00:33:18] that will directly affect

[00:33:20] both end users

[00:33:22] first time home buyers and investors

[00:33:24] alike this one if implemented

[00:33:26] could be pretty serious well

[00:33:28] it would be pretty serious if you lie about your income

[00:33:30] on a mortgage application so

[00:33:32] no one's ever done that in Canada yeah

[00:33:34] I think it's a national

[00:33:36] sport here that's funny

[00:33:38] because everybody's like I posted

[00:33:40] that one and when I was posting the

[00:33:42] stuff from the housing plan by the way we are

[00:33:44] doing it we're going to do a webinar going through the entire housing plan

[00:33:46] it's on what is it may

[00:33:48] 8th May 8th there's a link at

[00:33:50] Lincoln show notes yeah not by Lincoln show

[00:33:52] notes for it and we're going to go

[00:33:54] through kind of all the opportunities in this but this is the one that stood out to everyone as like this is going to have a

[00:33:56] biggest impact on the market

[00:33:58] if mortgage fraud

[00:34:00] is as rampant as what everyone's saying

[00:34:02] maybe people wouldn't even be able to get

[00:34:04] to the 4.5 income hurdle that we described earlier

[00:34:06] in the show because

[00:34:08] the federal government confirmed plans to consult

[00:34:10] with the mortgage industry on

[00:34:12] developing income verification tools

[00:34:14] through the Canada Revenue Agency if you listen

[00:34:16] to our most recent episode

[00:34:18] interviewing Sean Frazier about this

[00:34:20] he mentioned how

[00:34:22] they don't really have a timeline on it but they are in a hurry to get it done

[00:34:24] because they deem that it's pretty necessary

[00:34:26] I think in political speak that means it's never going to happen

[00:34:28] I don't know

[00:34:30] well I mean like a lot of people were like oh yeah

[00:34:32] the plans to do the consult

[00:34:34] like it's kind of

[00:34:36] they were like oh it seemed like wishy washy

[00:34:38] it's like a plan to do a consultation

[00:34:40] plan to a plan to do that

[00:34:42] but to be fair this is like

[00:34:44] banks and people's

[00:34:46] financial information and their tax info

[00:34:48] like this is like the one thing where like it needs to be done really well

[00:34:50] right

[00:34:52] like hopefully it doesn't end up like a live

[00:34:54] like the CRA recently but

[00:34:56] they're not the most I mean listen

[00:34:58] hey nothing but respect for the people that work there

[00:35:00] but uh man

[00:35:02] trying to get anything done with the CRA

[00:35:04] phone calls, getting

[00:35:06] your code for your

[00:35:08] business number it's just you know

[00:35:10] it's a pain I don't know anyone that's had

[00:35:12] great experience well I think it's just like a lot of analog

[00:35:14] systems yeah exactly that's what I mean

[00:35:16] they don't think they've been able to spend a lot

[00:35:18] in the housing plan one of those things was to start to digitize

[00:35:20] all this stuff right everything from

[00:35:22] CMHC data stats can data to

[00:35:24] to more you know digitize and it's kind of one of those

[00:35:26] things where it ends up being like

[00:35:28] is it better late than ever or is it too

[00:35:30] little too late right like this is where I think

[00:35:32] a lot of people are like which cliche

[00:35:34] voters will decide I guess I feel like I just named

[00:35:36] two country songs right I could I think

[00:35:38] I just wrote a verse for a country song

[00:35:40] come on now yeah um

[00:35:42] now so this

[00:35:44] tool is something that a lot of industry

[00:35:46] legends have been talking about for a long time

[00:35:48] we've brought it up on the show many times

[00:35:50] and it comes up when we talk about all

[00:35:52] of the fraud and money laundering in the mortgage

[00:35:54] and real estate space which actually is another thing that

[00:35:56] they brought up in the housing plan that they're going to try and make

[00:35:58] to try and get rid of but it's

[00:36:00] obviously finally becoming a bit more mainstream

[00:36:02] yeah so this is from the government's

[00:36:04] new housing strategy and I quote

[00:36:06] independently verifying

[00:36:08] borrower income helps financial institutions

[00:36:10] detect and

[00:36:12] deter the types of fraud

[00:36:14] or misrepresentation

[00:36:16] that can increase the cost

[00:36:18] of mortgages for all

[00:36:20] borrowers the plan reads

[00:36:22] budget 2024 will propose

[00:36:24] the government's intention to consult

[00:36:26] with the mortgage industry

[00:36:28] on making a tool available

[00:36:30] through the CRA to verify

[00:36:32] income

[00:36:34] verify borrower income for mortgages

[00:36:36] the government is also promising

[00:36:38] additional funding for

[00:36:40] the CRA to crack down on

[00:36:42] real estate fraud

[00:36:44] yeah so I would say

[00:36:46] this is

[00:36:48] this is like going to have a big impact

[00:36:50] from my perspective if mortgage fraud

[00:36:52] is as big as what a lot of people

[00:36:54] say and what was the

[00:36:56] that thing that came out the CBC expose

[00:36:58] where they were doing like the hidden camera stuff with

[00:37:00] all the mortgage fraud right and

[00:37:02] there's a couple of other ones that came out that HSBC

[00:37:04] thing that we did an episode on crazy

[00:37:06] I would say that this is probably a lot more prominent

[00:37:08] than a lot of people want

[00:37:10] to think as best kept secret to be

[00:37:12] honest like it's funny because two years ago like I was saying

[00:37:14] well like we've been saying this on twitter space is

[00:37:16] like forever and I know Ron

[00:37:18] but like it's credited with this a lot but like Ron didn't

[00:37:20] act and I'm not chirping because like you know

[00:37:22] we like Ron friend of the show we've done

[00:37:24] some work with him panels etc

[00:37:26] I had to convince him that

[00:37:28] fraud was actually like very rampant right

[00:37:30] like cuz you know he's an older guy

[00:37:32] he's been in the industry for a long time

[00:37:34] I would imagine if you're

[00:37:36] like you know all most of your clients are probably boomers who have

[00:37:38] enough money who aren't committing fraud like there's a lot of people out

[00:37:40] there just committing fraud for shelter or like

[00:37:42] investors saying they're going to live in a house

[00:37:44] and that's a big one and

[00:37:46] yeah like in getting 95 loaned of value mortgages

[00:37:48] and not living in them

[00:37:50] like that's probably the most common type of mortgage

[00:37:52] fraud really this stuff is exceptionally

[00:37:54] common I think and I think it's a symptom

[00:37:56] not a cause of the housing crisis I don't actually

[00:37:58] think it's gonna but I think now

[00:38:00] it probably will it will definitely have an impact

[00:38:02] if they start capping this like I think that there's a lot of

[00:38:04] inflated demand where people are buying

[00:38:06] more than they can qualify for because

[00:38:08] they're faking stuff the question is whether or not

[00:38:10] they get this done before

[00:38:12] the election and when I was

[00:38:14] when I was doing the interview like I think

[00:38:16] with Scott I was saying

[00:38:18] aren't they more likely to do

[00:38:20] like you know it's like oh

[00:38:22] people don't trust them to execute all of the things in the plan

[00:38:24] okay true I would agree with that

[00:38:26] the polls make that pretty obvious like that's more

[00:38:28] just facts not really like my opinion

[00:38:30] but doesn't that mean that like

[00:38:32] it's do or die for them and they're more likely

[00:38:34] to do like you think more

[00:38:36] more likely than ever to actually try

[00:38:38] and execute on a lot of stuff that's my thought

[00:38:40] anyway the response from the mortgage

[00:38:42] industry seems to be positive

[00:38:44] in an update to its members

[00:38:46] NPC said that it's proud of their efforts

[00:38:48] around the issues of

[00:38:50] a digital income verification

[00:38:52] and it's they're happy that it's

[00:38:54] yielded this kind of attention from the highest levels

[00:38:56] of government and they're confident that

[00:38:58] a collaboration between the CRA and the housing

[00:39:00] and infrastructure sector stakeholders will ultimately

[00:39:02] benefit home buyers

[00:39:04] yeah and I mean again

[00:39:06] if you've listened to show you know

[00:39:08] we've spoken about this multiple times mortgage fraud

[00:39:10] in Canada has been a

[00:39:12] growing problem and been getting worse

[00:39:14] in recent years with an ex with

[00:39:16] the Equifax reporting

[00:39:18] fraud cases are up

[00:39:20] 52%

[00:39:22] since 2013

[00:39:24] now the problem has also become

[00:39:26] very costly for lenders

[00:39:28] with research finding that

[00:39:30] for every one dollar

[00:39:32] cost to fraud

[00:39:34] cost Canadian financial service

[00:39:36] firms over $3.78

[00:39:38] cents to recover

[00:39:40] that's horrible that's crazy

[00:39:42] that's a negative

[00:39:44] and this is something that

[00:39:46] we

[00:39:48] yes we you listening everybody you know

[00:39:50] should be angry about because

[00:39:52] that money essentially

[00:39:54] is being taken out of the economy to just chase

[00:39:56] fraudulent activity which is already

[00:39:58] taking money out of the

[00:40:00] economy and just kind of messing the whole system up

[00:40:02] so Dan couple of notes from

[00:40:04] some from some friends of the show here

[00:40:06] and then let's get out of here yeah so another

[00:40:08] friend of the show Ben Rabadou an analyst

[00:40:10] with Edge Realty Analytics which by the way

[00:40:12] if you don't follow

[00:40:14] Edge Realty Analytics

[00:40:16] or I guess if you're a real estate professional like Realty

[00:40:18] Morty's broker I think it's like 50 bucks 60 bucks

[00:40:20] a month 60 bucks a month

[00:40:22] and it's like you think I'm smart on

[00:40:24] like the economy and stuff it's just because

[00:40:26] I read Ben's report honestly

[00:40:28] like honestly take it

[00:40:30] people are like oh how do you know all this I'm like

[00:40:32] I literally just like read this

[00:40:34] and then like I just think about it for

[00:40:36] like an hour and then now I'm smart for the month

[00:40:38] it comes out monthly and he does a monthly

[00:40:40] call as well I think I'm trying to get him

[00:40:42] to get an affiliate link for us so

[00:40:44] we'll do that because I not not because

[00:40:46] I care but like because I want him to be

[00:40:48] like I want because I've been saying to

[00:40:50] Ben like you don't sleep on social media don't

[00:40:52] sleep on podcasts and

[00:40:54] I want to prove to him that we can get some

[00:40:56] traffic let's prove it hell yeah yeah so

[00:40:58] and another friend of the show who I

[00:41:00] was mentioning this earlier Ron Butler

[00:41:02] called the announcement great news

[00:41:04] there are two very public figures in the industry

[00:41:06] and thought leaders and

[00:41:08] they and to have their buy-in is a big deal

[00:41:10] itself I think it was uh Ron Butler

[00:41:12] was it Ron and Ben or I think it was Ron and

[00:41:14] Steven Punois you know who else was testifying

[00:41:16] Ron had to testify at parliament

[00:41:18] about this matter yeah yeah that was a

[00:41:20] couple months ago he was on TV

[00:41:22] did some he did some content about it

[00:41:24] anyways that is it in case we've

[00:41:26] looked at Aussie's new lending

[00:41:28] rules 30 year amortizations

[00:41:30] and lenders working

[00:41:32] with the CRA man there is just so

[00:41:34] much happening

[00:41:36] in the real

[00:41:38] estate and mortgage

[00:41:40] space and then the economy in general right now

[00:41:42] for sure it's a rapidly

[00:41:44] changing environment there's a lot of big changes

[00:41:46] coming in the pipeline

[00:41:48] non-stop news right now lots of talk

[00:41:50] and lots of good ideas

[00:41:52] hopefully we'll see some action as a result

[00:41:54] of it so for a more in-depth look at

[00:41:56] the new housing plan make sure to sign up

[00:41:58] for our free webinar where we're actually

[00:42:00] decode the whole thing and identify some

[00:42:02] good opportunities within it and outline

[00:42:04] the opportunity for investors

[00:42:06] check the first link

[00:42:08] in the show notes should be real estate

[00:42:10] slash link in the show notes yeah register

[00:42:12] for that look forward to seeing you on there and

[00:42:14] when you register you'll have to go through

[00:42:16] our free community to join it so

[00:42:18] we'll see you in there as well 100%

[00:42:20] love it thanks so much for listening everybody

[00:42:22] we'll see you on the next one

[00:42:50] real estate