What Financial Planning Should Look Like with Mark McGrath
The Canadian InvestorMarch 18, 2024
362
00:55:5251.19 MB

What Financial Planning Should Look Like with Mark McGrath

In this special episode, join Simon alongside Mark McGrath, a certified financial planner from PWL, as they dive deep into the intricacies of financial planning and investment strategies. They begin by discussing the benefits of index investing as a cornerstone of sound financial planning including the pros and cons of home country bias. The conversation then pivots to debunking the myths surrounding dividend investing, providing a critical examination of the pursuit for high yields and the necessity for thorough research to avoid common traps.

As the dialogue progresses, Simon and Mark explore the dynamic realm of cryptocurrency investments. With the advent of new Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US, Mark provides insight if he has seen increased interest from clients as a result of the launch.

The episode rounds off with a crucial conversation on pension plans, specifically the distinctions and misunderstandings between Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC) plans. They underscore the essential need for investors to grasp the subtleties of their retirement savings options, challenging the prevailing notion that all DB plans are inherently superior.

  • Mark’s twitter: @MarkMcGrathCFP

Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com

Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast!

Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools.

Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

[00:00:00] This is the Canadian Investor, where you take control of your own portfolio and gain

[00:00:06] the confidence you need to succeed in the markets.

[00:00:10] Hosted by Braden Dennis and Simon Belanger.

[00:00:15] Welcome back to the Canadian Investor Podcast.

[00:00:17] I'm here today with Mark McGrath who's a financial or financial planner.

[00:00:22] Is that the best term with PWL?

[00:00:25] Yeah, so technically the title is Financial Planner and Associate Supportfolio Manager.

[00:00:30] Okay, well okay so I'll just say Financial Planner.

[00:00:33] Good enough.

[00:00:35] That's good so well.

[00:00:37] Mark thanks for coming on the podcast.

[00:00:38] I've been following you on Twitter.

[00:00:40] You always have some pretty interesting takes.

[00:00:43] You know I agree for the most part.

[00:00:45] I mean sometimes I don't fully agree but I think that's okay.

[00:00:48] I mean I think you have some good discussions and you know for the most part some good

[00:00:52] logic behind it.

[00:00:53] So you want to tell us a little bit about yourself because you've never been on the podcast

[00:00:57] before.

[00:00:58] I know some of our listeners are familiar with you but you can just introduce yourself

[00:01:03] and also your general guiding principle as a financial planner.

[00:01:08] Sure, sure thanks.

[00:01:09] And thanks for having me.

[00:01:11] It's great to be here.

[00:01:12] I know you've got maybe not that many financial planners or advisors that get an opportunity

[00:01:16] to come here and chat with you so I wanted to be here.

[00:01:18] Thank you.

[00:01:19] Yeah so Mark McGrath at Work at PWL Capital as he said Simon.

[00:01:22] I've been doing this for about 14 years off and on kind of doing different roles within

[00:01:28] or adjacent to the financial planning and investment advice space.

[00:01:31] I joined PWL just last year in July after following a lot of what PWL have been doing

[00:01:38] for years and years and years like going back to the Canadian couch potato, the rational

[00:01:42] reminder podcast which maybe some of your listeners are familiar with so I've been kind

[00:01:45] of following PWL for a long time and it was truly thrilled when I got the opportunity

[00:01:51] to join them.

[00:01:52] I'm B.C.

[00:01:53] I'm about halfway between Vancouver and Whistler and Squamish B.C. moved up here in 2019

[00:01:58] early 2019.

[00:01:59] I've got two young kids now so we wanted to get out of the city and come to the suburbs

[00:02:04] and as you mentioned I'm quite active on Twitter.

[00:02:06] I like to go out there and chat with people all the time and talk about index funds

[00:02:09] and financial planning and all that fun stuff.

[00:02:11] No, that's great.

[00:02:12] You'll have to plug me in with Ben Felix from the rational reminders just because I think

[00:02:17] he's in Ottawa so be good to kind of meet him personally, maybe have him on the podcast

[00:02:21] but I digress.

[00:02:22] So, we've been pretty critical of financial advisors, financial planners on the podcast.

[00:02:28] I mean I think it's just because of the experience and the feedback we've had from our listeners.

[00:02:33] People I know in my personal life friends and family, the typical and I don't think

[00:02:37] that'll come as a surprise where you have an air quotes this financial advisor who I

[00:02:42] usually I think is just someone with a mutual fund license.

[00:02:45] That will be putting them in these high fees 2% plus mutual funds that are underperforming

[00:02:51] the market oftentimes extremely high bond allocation for someone that would be in the

[00:02:56] 30s for example and providing little to no advice.

[00:03:01] Just meeting with them once a year to just go over I guess their returns and that's about

[00:03:04] it.

[00:03:05] So, how do you defer?

[00:03:06] And I saw tweet in terms of like how you approach new clients.

[00:03:10] I think meeting with them first, collecting some information and then without a cost

[00:03:17] yeah just letting them decide whether they want to continue with you.

[00:03:20] So do you want to talk about the differences and maybe some of the gripes that you also

[00:03:25] have with people called themselves financial advisor?

[00:03:29] Sure, yeah it's a good question, it's a big question.

[00:03:32] And I largely agree with you and I think it's a function of how the industry kind of started

[00:03:38] and where it is today I mean a lot of the financial advice industry has largely been built

[00:03:43] up on commissions right.

[00:03:44] And if we go back to like DSC deferred sales charges on mutual funds as an example or

[00:03:50] even front load fees on mutual funds, a lot of advisors when they were just getting started

[00:03:53] that's how they paid the bills was transaction fees right in commissions.

[00:03:59] And so because of that the focus was always on investment products and that's how advisors

[00:04:03] built practices right it was very very transactional in commission based in nature.

[00:04:07] And I think that's changing a lot so myself and PWL we are what we would call I guess

[00:04:12] AUM advisors or fee you know there's many different terms for it but fee only means we charge

[00:04:18] a fee on the portfolio is that we manage but we don't have transaction commissions or anything

[00:04:24] like that.

[00:04:25] So we're not compensated through the transactions, it doesn't matter what our clients

[00:04:27] have in their portfolios, our compensation doesn't change but I think a lot of it also

[00:04:31] comes from where you were kind of trained and so we have this we have these kind of echo

[00:04:34] chambers I think in the industry where if you grew up in a firm that was very sales oriented

[00:04:39] and you were trained from the top down to do things a certain way or to sell a certain

[00:04:43] type of you know mutual fund with high fees for example that you know they think can beat

[00:04:46] the market.

[00:04:48] You grew up in that environment that's all you know and you think that's the best way

[00:04:51] to do things and then maybe you change to a different firm where they do things a little

[00:04:54] bit differently and you have maybe a bit of an epiphany and go oh actually this is the right

[00:04:57] way to do it but that might not be much better than what you would learn before and so I

[00:05:02] think for a lot of advisors it's difficult to break out of this these kind of echo chambers

[00:05:06] that are that they they fall into like everybody's going to start somewhere right I started

[00:05:10] at the bank and you know we all have our opinions about the banks but they're very sales focused

[00:05:14] right.

[00:05:15] So it takes a keen interest and curiosity about I think the evidence and about the bigger

[00:05:21] scope of investment advice to kind of break free from that and we're just talking about

[00:05:25] the investment side here but really where the value is in my opinion is around all of

[00:05:29] the other things that aren't investment related right so we talk I talk about financial

[00:05:32] planning all the time and that's a that's a big catch all term and what is financial

[00:05:36] planning mean right.

[00:05:37] The way I think about it is that most people are likely to make thousands of financial decisions

[00:05:43] in their lives right around many many different topics from retirement planning to investing

[00:05:47] to insurance and risk management to state planning small business concerns if you have a corporation

[00:05:52] education planning for kids there's there's dozens and dozens of things that people generally

[00:05:57] need advice about and that's where good advisors are good financial planners I believe can

[00:06:01] add value to their clients so my process as you mentioned is basically I do often a 30 minute

[00:06:06] call with somebody and just gets to know them a little bit and the whole purpose of that

[00:06:09] call is to see are we the right people for you right like is what you need in your life

[00:06:14] right now somebody like us or is it better for you to go and see like a fee only project

[00:06:18] based type of advisor or you pay them wants to solve a couple of problems because we're not

[00:06:22] for everybody and I don't think everybody needs a financial advisor but I will say that

[00:06:25] focusing on the financial planning aspects first if they do come on board getting to know

[00:06:29] them getting to solve all of those bigger financial planning pieces first the investment recommendation

[00:06:34] follows from that right like you can't I can't tell you how to build a portfolio unless

[00:06:38] I know you very intimately so that's it's it's a bit of a reverse from I think how the

[00:06:42] industry was built.

[00:06:43] Yeah no I think that's a great point because people will look at you know at me my investments

[00:06:47] are my co-hosts and we always remind them look we have a certain risk tolerance we have a

[00:06:53] certain we know the businesses we own I also own a mix of index funds I do kind of a more

[00:06:58] hybrid approach all you know research some businesses less than 10 I own them and then I have

[00:07:04] an index fund approach but it's not for everyone obviously index investing is a pretty powerful

[00:07:10] tool and it's usually what I'll recommend to people who you know want to do it themselves but don't

[00:07:15] want to put in too much time and I think the time component but also being able to read financial

[00:07:21] statements and be willing to learn that stuff is really important so I do I do like that approach

[00:07:25] and I guess you also do maybe not you but your team I'm assuming you work with other people

[00:07:31] tax planning a state planning all these kind of things.

[00:07:34] Exactly and that's where we spend most of our time right like when when people come to me I

[00:07:37] tell them like we're gonna spend probably 10% 15% of our time on the actual portfolio management side

[00:07:42] because one support to your point where we're index investors as well we use different types of

[00:07:47] indexes we use factor indexes but at the end of the day it's just a different type of index so

[00:07:51] we're all about low cost indexing and once that portfolio is set up it's very very simple for many

[00:07:55] of my clients and our clients and myself included we use a single fund and it owns you know 12,000

[00:08:00] stocks all around the world so once we've got that in place there's not a lot of maintenance to be

[00:08:03] done around the actual investment portfolio itself but the beautiful thing about that is it opens

[00:08:08] up all of our time to really focus on the important things tax planning and the state planning

[00:08:12] you know we're not accountants we're not lawyers we're planners and so we look deep into the future

[00:08:17] for clients and identify things that we think are going to help down the road whereas often not

[00:08:22] always the case but often accountants are a little bit backwards looking for example right you

[00:08:25] meet with your accountant and they're looking at the prior year to see where can we save you some

[00:08:29] tax so it's very common for us to sit down with our clients accountants or their state lawyers and

[00:08:34] go through those areas with them yeah and it wasn't one of the things I mentioned to you but

[00:08:39] I am interested to hear your thoughts on this so one of there's always this debate right between

[00:08:45] the FSA and RSP you see it a lot people on Twitter and I do agree some situation for example if you

[00:08:51] have you know a higher earner out of a couple for example 1 person earns way more than the other

[00:08:57] person a spousal RSP and potentially withdrawing the money a couple years down the line could be

[00:09:02] really tax efficient but from the TFSA perspective I find that a lot of people and it's hard to quantify

[00:09:09] but the certainty with taxes is a big advantage because as much as you like to plan and if you're

[00:09:16] planning for you know couple decades down the line I mean tax brackets could look completely

[00:09:22] different than they do right now you're projected income you know there could be some bumps in the

[00:09:27] road you don't exactly know so what are your thoughts on that I don't know I feel like this is a

[00:09:32] quality of the TFSA that tends to be brushed over by a lot of people at least on Twitter that I see

[00:09:38] no you're absolutely right and the way you just phrase it is exactly the way to think about it right

[00:09:42] the RSP is a trade-off for tax certain T versus the TFSA so you you you know you earn your money

[00:09:48] and you decide am I going to pay tax on it now am I going to pay tax on it later and if I'm going

[00:09:53] to pay tax on it later I'm going to use the RSP and the primary reason I want to do that is because

[00:09:57] I believe that I'm going to pay a lower rate of tax on the withdrawals than the bracket that I'm in

[00:10:02] today but to your point future taxes are unknowable taxes have been actually pretty stable in Canada I

[00:10:07] know there's been some variation but if you look at charts of marginal tax rates historically

[00:10:12] it's not that they just continuously go up I think a lot of people believe that but if you if you

[00:10:15] actually look it up the marginal tax rates haven't changed like really significantly but there is

[00:10:20] that uncertainty and there is that risk the tax rates could be higher in the future and so the TFSA

[00:10:24] does give you that certainty today a big problem with the TFSA is that the contribution room is relatively

[00:10:30] limited for higher earners right like $7,000 a year I mean yeah if you compound that out over decades

[00:10:36] in decades you're going to have a seven-figure TFSA in future value but RSP room is generally a lot

[00:10:41] higher so to your point for higher income earners specifically the RSP can be very very compelling

[00:10:46] I'm a huge fan of the RSP and I think it gets a lot of flak that is undeserved and it's a

[00:10:51] deceptively complex account when you really look at it and when you try to factor in these future

[00:10:55] taxes but to your point the TFSA is simple it's tax certainty today and it's very flexible because

[00:11:00] you can withdraw without no taxes or without penalty and you can re-contribute so in a perfect world

[00:11:04] if you're a higher earner max out both if your income is lower TFSA is a beautiful thing

[00:11:09] yeah and just in case some people aren't aware so the RSP room is accumulated it's 18% of your salary

[00:11:14] up to the maximum I think it's what 31 32 000 just on I think 30 yeah 30 700 or something like that for

[00:11:21] last year okay yeah always get confused with the money purchase limit which is just a year before

[00:11:26] basically the RSP limit yeah so no those are great points

[00:11:31] before we talk about index investing and then dividend investing so what are like maybe two

[00:11:37] most common mistakes that you see from an individual who start working with you

[00:11:41] and I know you focus primarily working with physicians right yeah historically I've worked

[00:11:45] primarily with physicians I do a number of clients who are not physicians but I'd say it's hard

[00:11:51] to answer one of the most common mistakes because everybody is so unique in what they've done

[00:11:56] so far with their financial plan and I get a lot of clients or prospective clients that come to me

[00:12:02] they don't all come from the same place so many of them were do it yourselfers who are now either

[00:12:05] don't have the inclination the time the the energy they don't want to do it themselves or some of

[00:12:09] them come from other institutions or other planning has been done for them but I'd say a lot of

[00:12:13] from the do it yourself crowd the biggest mistakes I see are thinking you're an index investor

[00:12:18] because you own an index fund for example I had a client that had all of his money in industrial ETFs

[00:12:26] like industrial sector ETFs and so he's like no I don't need your help I'm an index investor like well

[00:12:30] let me take a look at the portfolio and the spirit of indexing is really to grab you know the global

[00:12:35] market cap weighted portfolio and participate in the market returns but this individual by owning

[00:12:41] an index fund identify themselves as an index investor but there was a lack of diversification

[00:12:45] diversification there for sure right so I think people tinker with their portfolios they overallocate

[00:12:51] to risky sectors they under diversify that's a big thing that we see and the other one is I'd say

[00:12:56] not playing defense properly like most people maybe not most but many people don't have the right

[00:13:01] types or amounts of insurance like life insurance disability insurance that type of thing

[00:13:05] where they've got some through work and they think that's enough and it turns out it's not

[00:13:08] we're near enough and the other defensive tactic is estate planning right like not having wills

[00:13:12] not having accounts set up in a way that's going to allow you to distribute your assets if something

[00:13:17] happens to you and not only a tax-efficient way but in a quick manner and to the people that you want

[00:13:21] the assets to go to but there's there's lots right like people paying high fees for closet indexing

[00:13:27] at a different institution or misunderstanding things like rsps versus tfsa isn't having

[00:13:31] preconceived notions about things where it's really just a financial literacy issue yeah I totally

[00:13:36] agree I mean I think there should be more just financial indication in our in our schools just

[00:13:41] because a lot of stuff I've learned I've just I learned on my own because I'm interested in it

[00:13:46] I've always been good at math so it's just came a bit naturally but I'm looking back and I went

[00:13:51] to a really really good high school as well as like one of the top schools in Quebec and I think

[00:13:56] we had one course that talked a little bit about the basics of the stock markets and bonds but it

[00:14:02] was just a basic basic so I it's not surprising that you know there's a lot of people and I may be

[00:14:09] guilty of one of these mistakes the the will the will is on my to-do list this year because

[00:14:15] I have a daughter now so it is definitely something I will be doing now to go back to index investing

[00:14:21] so I'm gonna push back a little bit and you had tweeted that the Qt so the Vanguard all equity

[00:14:27] fun or execute T work great option for global equity exposure and the reason I want to push back is

[00:14:32] because it's it has a big waiting to Canada and we've been pretty critical on this podcast about

[00:14:41] you know home country bias for Canadians and even though I think this fund is is not bad at all

[00:14:47] it's actually pretty good fund quite low fees I maybe something that would be like XA W which is

[00:14:53] the all-world excluding Canada and mixing that with maybe a 5 to 10% allocation to a Canadian

[00:15:00] index fund would make a bit more sense so what's your kind of thought process on those two funds

[00:15:06] that I just mentioned? I mean those are great great funds right to your point you can combine them

[00:15:11] to generate the amount of home bias that you want and still then have a global index portfolio which

[00:15:16] which is great I think at the end of the day home home bias is a preference it's a choice you can

[00:15:21] you can set up your portfolio to have some none and then quite frankly many people have too much

[00:15:26] home bias right? The reason that I think funds like VQT and XQT are solid is or let me back up one

[00:15:33] of the reasons that home bias matters is currency and taxes right I mean we're Canadians presumably

[00:15:39] we're gonna consume in Canadian dollars we're gonna retire in Canada and consume in Canadian dollars

[00:15:43] and having a home bias acts as a currency hedge for your future consumption in some way right?

[00:15:49] so you had mentioned XA W if you had you know everything in XA W with a very small allocation to

[00:15:54] Canada if the Canadian dollar is very strong over your investment horizon and there's no way

[00:15:58] to predict that it's going to have an adverse effect on your returns right? So if the Canadian dollar

[00:16:03] grows you're not capturing the returns of the marketing Canadian dollars and so you can you can

[00:16:08] introduce a lot of risk to your portfolio just from the currency standpoint. So having a bit of

[00:16:11] a hedge against the currency risk by allocating more to Canadian stocks I think helps another reason is

[00:16:16] taxes so dividends are relatively tax-efficient right? And in Canada Canadian eligible dividends

[00:16:23] I should say because foreign dividends are actually quite punitive from a tax perspective they're

[00:16:26] taxed as just like interest would be so fully taxed and you can get into foreign withholding

[00:16:30] taxes and all these other things. So there's some tax benefits holding some some home bias

[00:16:35] there's a few good studies about it as well I mean there's a paper that came out recently

[00:16:40] that looked at this and suggested that the optimal home bias was 30 to 40 percent. Now this is

[00:16:45] based on historical data of course in Canada's had a really good run compared to many many countries

[00:16:49] right? If you were in Italy holding 30 to 40 percent home bias would have been pretty bad news.

[00:16:54] Yeah or Japan I don't think you'd done exactly yeah totally so there are countries where

[00:16:59] historically that wouldn't have made a lot of sense Canada's got a you know pretty stable economy

[00:17:05] in the grand scheme of things but there there's some risk to having too much there's risk to not

[00:17:08] having enough and so I think a lot of it just comes down to you to preference and understanding those

[00:17:14] risks something like execute because it's one fund and I think it's got about 24 percent in Canadian

[00:17:20] for me I think that's I think it's a reasonable decision to make right? Now that's fair and also the

[00:17:26] the angle I'm coming from too is I'll also presuppose that a lot of people's you know living currently

[00:17:33] is dependent on the Canadian economy maybe not fully right there's different levels so having such

[00:17:38] a large allocation to Canadian equities it just makes the person very dependent on the Canadian

[00:17:45] economy and hoping it performs well so that's kind of where I'm coming from for that.

[00:17:48] Mm-hmm no that's it's a good point right and especially if you work for a Canadian company in

[00:17:54] your day job you have your human capital tied up in the Canadian economy and you have your

[00:17:58] financial capital tied up in the Canadian economy and if you live here and you own your home you have

[00:18:02] your your shelter tied up in the Canadian economy so I mean absolutely you want to diversify

[00:18:06] the level of Canadian hope by so you have in the portfolio again I think it's a preference

[00:18:11] the study show 30 to 40 percent I think 5 percent is probably a little bit too low even though to your

[00:18:16] point it does more closely mirror the global cap weights of the Canadian economy but you know if

[00:18:22] you if you got 10 to 20 percent yeah and all of this is just based on we don't know what the future

[00:18:25] is to hold to right so there's no way to know in advance what the optimal amount is we can only

[00:18:30] look at this by looking backwards. No exactly and speaking of the Canadian market we have a lot of

[00:18:35] dividend payers in that as you as you definitely know and you know I have nothing against dividend

[00:18:41] stocks I do own some in my portfolio but the plans I tend to approach these Canadian stocks that are

[00:18:49] dividend payers or just dividend payers in general is that to me I'm trying to achieve the

[00:18:54] best total returns right so if I can achieve that with these dividend stocks definitely you know

[00:19:01] I want to own some but what I've seen is this kind of income focus I would say dividend like

[00:19:09] especially on Twitter so dividend Twitter where you see them just pose the income that they have

[00:19:14] and I've checked multiple accounts and I know you know some of the accounts I'm talking about

[00:19:19] yeah I've checked some videos on YouTube where literally they never talk about their returns it's

[00:19:24] always about the monthly dividend payment for the month and you know we're having an issue and

[00:19:30] feel free to expand on that is it's just not being I don't know I don't know if they're willfully

[00:19:37] being not transparent to people or it's just they believe so much in it it was almost like cult

[00:19:42] like where you know that's what they think they like getting paid for their stocks and they don't

[00:19:47] really care about the total return so what's I mean do you have anything to add on that what's your

[00:19:51] thoughts on that? I largely agree with you and anybody who who knows me or follows me that's

[00:19:56] listening to this will know about some of the sort of epic dividend battles I've gotten myself

[00:20:01] into on Twitter and we usually you know end out fairly friendly with the dividend accounts at

[00:20:06] the end of the day but you know I fully agree at the end of the day total returns is what you eat

[00:20:11] right and there are a lot of accounts and a lot of proponents of dividends out there

[00:20:16] that I think don't really understand that and they say what part of it is because they see the

[00:20:21] dividend as infinitely sustainable and they separate mentally the capital from the income right

[00:20:28] and so they focus on the dividend income and they never want to spend their capital so to speak

[00:20:33] and I just think that's that's dangerous like dividends get cut all the time and wall green so

[00:20:37] as a good example is it late last year I think they've been paying dividends for something

[00:20:40] 47 years in a row and they cut the dividend in half or eliminated it I don't quite remember

[00:20:44] but this stock took an absolute hammering right and so there's no way to know which the

[00:20:48] dividend aristocrats the dividend kings are going to be in the future and so dividend growth is

[00:20:53] I think there's there's risk to it that a lot of investors don't realize to your point I think

[00:20:57] it's easy to focus on the income and psychologically when the markets are down if that keeps you in

[00:21:02] your seat and keeps you from making mistakes with the portfolio I absolutely agree there there can

[00:21:07] definitely be some behavioral benefits to it but at the end of the day dividends aren't free

[00:21:11] money a lot of people see them as an additional source of return but you're just moving money from

[00:21:16] the businesses balance sheet to your pocket basically right and so the company must be less valuable

[00:21:22] after the dividends paid and so to your point the total returns are really really all that matters

[00:21:26] and a lot of new investors get caught up in this and this is where I I think have a major concern

[00:21:30] with it is you have these accounts touting the power of dividends over time and you get newer or

[00:21:35] novice investors focusing just on the yield and selecting only stocks that pay a dividend

[00:21:40] and dividend stocks have done relatively well historically like absolutely they perform pretty

[00:21:44] well but it's not because they pay a dividend it's because they're usually profitable companies bought

[00:21:47] at good prices and they have conservative investment mandates at the company they're run very well

[00:21:52] so if you can create a portfolio with those characteristics which are the characteristics that actually

[00:21:56] drive returns over the long run and kind of ignore dividends I think you can build a better portfolio

[00:22:00] and you can still get that dividend income yeah and I've noticed some of these accounts they also

[00:22:06] even some that have like you know hundred thousand a year in dividend income when you ask them to

[00:22:12] you know tell you about why they invested in that business they usually have a really hard time

[00:22:17] right even then they tend to focus on the dividend whether it's like looking at the payout ratio

[00:22:22] compared to their earnings or free castle oftentimes they don't even look at that which to me

[00:22:27] should be one of the first steps if you want to see if there's actually some sustainability

[00:22:32] there to the dividend but they're I've noticed they don't do the basic homework on the

[00:22:37] companies themselves they just focus zoning on the dividend and nothing else matters

[00:22:44] yeah I mean the irony in this is that I own more dividend stocks than all these these guys because

[00:22:48] I own 12,000 stocks I own all of them right and so I get into these fights with them that I

[00:22:52] call that car I do more dividend stocks than you do right so it's not about the dividends I have

[00:22:56] no problem with dividends I certainly want to you know keep the dividends that are paid to me but I

[00:23:01] think I mean as an indexer I'd argue the type of work you're talking about to analyze a company

[00:23:06] isn't worth doing in the first place I know you disagree with that I'm sure to let your listeners do

[00:23:10] but again I'm an indexer so I buy a store it's that strategy but you're right I think a lot of us

[00:23:14] we see these businesses especially Canadian dividend stocks like the banks or the telcos and the

[00:23:19] utilities they just feel invincible right like we have this kind of like oligopoly and some of

[00:23:26] these industries I guess and it just feels like the gut feeling is those companies are never going to go

[00:23:30] away they're always going to be profitable they're always going to do well and that could be true

[00:23:34] but buying good businesses at bad prices isn't a good investment and you can buy bad companies at

[00:23:39] great prices and it can be a great investment so by just focusing on the wrong metrics things like

[00:23:43] the dividend yield you're not really putting together a very thoughtful portfolio in my opinion

[00:23:48] and if you can just keep your expected return the same by diversifying and owning other companies

[00:23:53] like what you're doing is concentrating your risk and you shouldn't really expect a higher return

[00:23:57] by concentrating your risk you should expect a lot more volatility but not necessarily a higher

[00:24:01] expected return over the long run so I think people suggest diversifying or the dividends like

[00:24:06] I have no idea what the yield is on my portfolio couldn't tell you yeah I mean either I mean and a

[00:24:11] problem too especially a higher dividend yielder is especially those are looking to achieve like

[00:24:15] 5% dividend or more they tend to be very concentrated in certain industries white you said telcos

[00:24:22] I guess industrials maybe real estate you also have utilities they tend to be those that are most

[00:24:29] concentrated on so I think it adds up some level of risk there and the other issue I have especially

[00:24:36] with the higher yielder are the ones that have been paying a dividend so the dividend risk

[00:24:40] or crats or kings for 25 plus years is I always get the impression that hamstrings or

[00:24:48] the management team a little bit when the you know sometimes the better decision would be to either

[00:24:55] stop growing the dividend or potentially cut it for the longer term for the business to be

[00:25:00] more successful longer term but because they're so afraid to cut the dividend they actually don't

[00:25:04] do it which will impact the future returns that you'll have with with that company yeah and I think

[00:25:10] 2008 like the great financial crisis is a good example of that the Canadian banks as far as

[00:25:15] I remember didn't cut we're stopped paying dividends and in hindsight that all worked out for them

[00:25:20] but at the time when we're at the hard right edge of one of the most market meltdowns in history

[00:25:25] and it's a credit crisis and the banks are looking at their investors and going we have to

[00:25:31] keep paying these dividends because if we don't the share price is going to tumble so to your point

[00:25:36] I think in that moment paying those dividends may not have been a great idea but the optics around

[00:25:42] cutting a dividend are can be devastating to the company right so they continue to pay them and

[00:25:47] then again it all kind of worked out in the end but you're right it does it does constrain them

[00:25:53] and I know a lot of dividend investors see that as a good thing right because it forces management to

[00:25:57] be potentially more cognizant of what they're doing with their with their money because they know

[00:26:02] they've got these dividend payments they have to make and so they're maybe more conservative but

[00:26:05] if you look at the literature on this it's it's companies that have conservative investment

[00:26:11] that's that's the key factor that you want in a company it's not that they pay the dividend so

[00:26:15] if you have a good management team that doesn't pay a dividend but manages their their capital and

[00:26:18] they're cash flow that way that's really the factor that you want to expose yourself to not

[00:26:22] necessarily just the dividend yeah or or they take on debt to keep the dividend which has been

[00:26:27] not happened there was an article a couple weeks ago about private equity and I know that's not

[00:26:32] the same necessarily as stocks in a lot of ways but they're this headline I think it was New York

[00:26:36] Times or maybe Forbes was that private equity firms are taking on record debt in order to pay

[00:26:41] out dividends so they're loading up these companies with debt in order to pay out dividends to

[00:26:45] satisfy investors is that a good business move I don't know it's good for the for the optics of it but

[00:26:50] yeah I'm not a big fan of private equity actually like dug into that some few months ago and

[00:26:56] I have some big issues with just the IR so the until rates of returns that they actually say because

[00:27:01] these returns are for the most part estimated they don't know for sure until they have an

[00:27:05] exited strategy right so they have these returns and then they bays are performance bonuses on

[00:27:10] that and then investors which are typically institutionals and up you know being stuck in the fun

[00:27:16] because they're only able to withdraw 50% of the capital at the end of the life expectancy of the

[00:27:22] fund yeah and the way that they draw capital to like the capital calls if you put a million

[00:27:25] dollars with the private equity firm but they only draw 300 of that your capital's tied up there

[00:27:31] because you have to be able to meet any capital calls that they make but then they calculate

[00:27:34] the IR are often just on the 300 that they drew but you've you've sideline to million dollars

[00:27:38] to make the investment so your actual investment return that you've earned yourself

[00:27:42] is not actually equivalent to the IR that the fund is posting right Michael James actually put out a

[00:27:47] very succinct and great piece on his blog about this a couple weeks ago that I read he tweeted about it

[00:27:52] but it's an interesting way to think about private equity and the fees are really really high and

[00:27:57] yeah no and that's what I found to I think Warren Buffett a couple maybe three four years ago said

[00:28:03] the same thing essentially you're yeah that capital frozen and then you know they'll just start

[00:28:09] calculating the IR on whatever they deploy even though you know you're not getting much on your capital

[00:28:15] maybe now a little more if you have it in the US Treasuries or short-term tea bills but

[00:28:20] yeah it's a big problem and I think it would be welcome I think in my opinion for more

[00:28:26] oversight in those industry but I feel like there's a lot of lobbying happening in the state

[00:28:31] to prevent that from happening now we'll move on so I'm sure you've been aware I know you had a few

[00:28:37] tweets about Bitcoin I was just kind of scrolling down your your timeline on Twitter or sorry

[00:28:43] X and I was just interested in knowing about you know your perspective for the spot Bitcoin ETF

[00:28:49] that launch into US knowing full knowing that obviously Canada it's been here for a couple years now

[00:28:55] so have you seen like greater interest from your clients since the launch have you had people

[00:28:59] just inquiring about it just because obviously I think Larry Fink has been that you're leading

[00:29:04] that amongst others I'm just curious to see the impact in Canada because I saw Bitwise survey

[00:29:10] that even a couple weeks before it was approved that very very few financial planners in the US

[00:29:15] were actually anticipating the spot Bitcoin to be approved this year and it happened 10 days

[00:29:21] in or 11 days in yeah that's interesting yeah Bitcoin's it's super fascinating I've largely

[00:29:27] been critical of Bitcoin well it's funny I started buying Bitcoin in 2016 and part of the

[00:29:32] reason I bought is just because I was getting a lot of inquiries about it so I was like okay I

[00:29:35] get to figure out what this is I'm going to learn to at least buy it so I can explain to my clients

[00:29:39] how I did it and what the what the experience was I was buying a little bit of it in 2016 and then

[00:29:43] I largely stopped and then the more I thought about it the sillier I thought Bitcoin was and so I'd

[00:29:47] get into these kind of discussions with with people on Twitter about Bitcoin and I realized quite recently

[00:29:53] that it's not fair for me to be critical of it if I haven't at least taken their viewpoint on

[00:29:57] it seriously and so they've got a number of books that they always recommend that you that you read

[00:30:01] to understand Bitcoin more fully so I went and I read those three highly recommended books this year

[00:30:06] once the Bitcoin standard the other one was broken money by Lynn Alden and the other one was Jeff

[00:30:12] Booth's price of tomorrow so I read all three and I thought they were great like they were they were

[00:30:18] great books and I mean a lot of my questions or skepticism around Bitcoin was largely addressed in

[00:30:24] those books and I was like oh okay so now I'm starting to see why Bitcoin enthusiasts are so

[00:30:31] enthusiastic about it and so I actually started buying a little bit of again recently I still think

[00:30:35] there's huge risks to it like it's not you see a lot of people talking as if they know the future

[00:30:39] and and Bitcoin is absolutely there's no chance of failure and I think that's a bit silly I think

[00:30:45] you have to take a look at this from a risk management perspective and just realize that lots of bad

[00:30:49] things can still happen to Bitcoin investors government intervention could get could ramp up right

[00:30:55] I'm not saying a will but there's absolutely risks right yeah I think I'm less critical of it now

[00:30:59] and I think I have a bit of a better viewpoint on it than I did before my clients generally like some do

[00:31:04] own it for sure and some people will come to me and they already own some but they want to diversify

[00:31:09] or whatever and I'm not I don't tell people to sell or or to buy more or anything like that I think

[00:31:13] if you have an interest in it and you understand it and you're buying it for a good reason that you

[00:31:17] can elucidate to me without just speculating like I want to buy it because I think it's going to go up

[00:31:23] well that's very very speculative and that's fine if you want to do that with a little bit of your

[00:31:26] money but I don't think people should make a core portfolio position built around a very volatile

[00:31:32] and speculative asset but you want to go through a couple bucks and scratch the itch to manage a bit

[00:31:37] yourself like absolutely interest hasn't really picked up since this body T.Fs in my experience but

[00:31:43] that could just be a bad sample bias like a lot of my clients I've worked with for a long time and

[00:31:47] they've been critical of it for a long time as well so it was kind of a like when the spot ETFs came

[00:31:51] out I expected the price to do nothing and it largely did and then it's it's it's come back so I

[00:31:56] think a good chunk of it was priced in but yeah if you want to own it I have no problem with it.

[00:32:01] No and I think that's a good point like look I own it is probably too big of a portion of my portfolio

[00:32:06] but it's because I started buying essentially after the crash in that early 2018 and to add to what

[00:32:13] you were saying for risk I actually initially bought Bitcoin in 2013 but the exchange that I bought

[00:32:19] it on essentially was you know they ran away with the money and was a bit of a scam so I lost half

[00:32:25] a Bitcoin back then so I was kind of snake bit in a little bit and then got back in later on

[00:32:31] but I think your tweet had some really good points and you had some people that were kind of going

[00:32:35] back and forth with you but that's what I like always remain respectful even if you disagree

[00:32:40] and I try to do the same on on Twitter and one of the big I think issues with Bitcoin is for people

[00:32:48] who want to actually own the Bitcoin it's not it's a learning curve so especially if you want to

[00:32:54] do self-custody whether it's cold storage or if you want to do some kind of multi-signature service

[00:33:01] like there's a couple of them out there they don't come to mine right away but I think Kasa is

[00:33:07] one of them that's pretty big I think it's scary for a lot of people right it's just different

[00:33:11] versus just going into their broker their online broker and just you know buying an ETF and then

[00:33:16] you click it's done you know it's the same as buying an index fund so have you seen that being a

[00:33:21] little bit of an issue with clients where either just kind of struggling to get started and just

[00:33:27] that fear of messing it up basically yeah and it's a real fear like I have my Bitcoin in cold storage

[00:33:34] like on a wallet I don't own a lot just to be clear but yeah I have it in cold storage and I tried

[00:33:38] to sell it like a couple years ago and I couldn't figure out how like it'd been a couple years since

[00:33:42] I bought it and like had figured out the wallet and I was like I can't remember how to sell this

[00:33:47] so I had to do a bunch of research and I kind of just gave up I was like how would I

[00:33:49] ever just leave it because it's hard to interact with unless you're kind of in that space all the time

[00:33:53] and really learning and thinking about it and I think about people like you know my mom or

[00:33:56] kind of older generations you might not have the same technical capabilities as younger generations

[00:34:00] and I think about her trying to interact with Bitcoin and I'm like she like she can barely you know

[00:34:05] she has we have to reset her password three times a week on her email right like there's no way

[00:34:10] there's no way she's getting into Bitcoin and so I think the ETFs at least give people the

[00:34:13] opportunity to interact with the price of Bitcoin and if that's why you're investing then I think the ETF

[00:34:18] is a great way to do that there was an article yesterday that I tweeted about about a guy who lost

[00:34:24] $350 million with a Bitcoin yeah yeah that's a replies I was looking at yeah yeah and I was like how

[00:34:30] is this not a problem right and and I was just posing that question to people on Twitter because

[00:34:33] maybe there's a great answer that I just don't know about and you you mentioned multi signature

[00:34:37] wallets in kasa I just learned about that yesterday from that that Twitter thread was like okay so

[00:34:41] there are safer ways to interact with Bitcoin but the risk of losing at all

[00:34:47] is is real and so if you're trying to own it directly in self custody yet unless you're very very

[00:34:53] careful and have some redundancies in place the possibility of losing everything is real

[00:34:58] and like if you've got a hundred thousand dollars in cash and physical bills you're probably not

[00:35:02] going to lose it unless it's taken from your rob or something like that but if your entire Bitcoin

[00:35:07] is written down on a piece of paper because it's just a seed phrase or something you lose that paper

[00:35:11] or the ink dries you spill wine on it or whatever it is you've got a real problem so I think the ETF

[00:35:16] solved that problem but I know a lot of the maximalists and enthusiasts that's not why they

[00:35:20] necessarily own Bitcoin like they do believe the price is going to go up of course but they own

[00:35:24] it because it's a lot of them are you know very anti-government and so the self custody and the

[00:35:28] trustless aspect of it is actually a feature not about yeah yeah and I mean that's the part why I

[00:35:34] own it right to me I see that a little bit of like insurance against our financial system just

[00:35:38] because there I'm sure you can agree there's been a lot of weird stuff happening especially since

[00:35:43] 2008 2009 which is government intervention so to me that's the way I see it and when people ask

[00:35:49] me like how much did I own I just say look you know I can't really tell you how much you should

[00:35:53] own I usually tell them we learn about it learn how it works and then you know usually I will tell

[00:35:59] them to be able to deal with the volatility I'll say just on whatever percentage you're comfortable

[00:36:05] with going to zero yeah I'm not saying it will but at least like that if you see a drawdown that's

[00:36:10] 50% you're not gonna panic so that's usually the approach I take when people ask me what

[00:36:15] percentage of my portfolio and the upside you know technically could be so big that even just

[00:36:21] of 1% you know could be 10x I don't know right but if it goes to zero then you're just losing 1%

[00:36:27] so that's the way I see it yeah I think that's a totally reasonable way to look at it right and like

[00:36:33] for me I own it because it's a hedge against me being wrong about it and then I don't know that

[00:36:36] Bitcoin is gonna 10x but there's this like what if aspect right like everybody says okay I get

[00:36:42] off zero have fun staying poor you're not gonna make it and I make fun of those people and then

[00:36:45] I'm like what if they're right like me and I know there's no way to know so a small allocation just

[00:36:51] gets me owning it and if I'm wrong about my previous thoughts on Bitcoin then I'm kind of hedged against

[00:36:57] my own my own mistake no that's great and I something I hadn't mentioned that I wanted to chat about

[00:37:04] I guess it just goes with Bitcoin a little bit do you get a lot of clients asking about owning gold

[00:37:08] especially in the last like three four years just kind of curious with obviously the you know

[00:37:14] like a better word the money printing that's been going on with all the the governments do you

[00:37:19] see a higher interest in gold from some of the more conservative investors I think I think

[00:37:25] with gold it really depends on your your world view in a lot of ways right like to your point

[00:37:29] with with money printing and government intervention in the markets you get a lot of people who are

[00:37:33] very concerned about that and gold is a way to kind of have some sort of physical asset right that

[00:37:39] in theory is a little bit more inflation resistant and so for for certain types of people they're

[00:37:44] very big on on gold for others they have no use for gold they don't understand why you wouldn't

[00:37:49] own gold and if the market's going to return some kind of equity risk premium in the future where I

[00:37:54] can get a reasonable return net of inflation over a long period of time then they don't see the

[00:37:58] utility of gold so I think I think whether someone wants to own gold or owns gold is more

[00:38:03] reflection of that person's view on things like government and the state of the world and that type

[00:38:08] of thing we talk about it from time to time with clients like as index investors we own all the

[00:38:13] gold miners anyway and I know that's not obviously quite the same as owning gold because there's a ton

[00:38:16] of like management risk and stuff there but you do have exposure to commodities especially if

[00:38:20] you have some home bias in your portfolio because the Canadian markets a little bit more bias towards

[00:38:25] the resource sector but yeah it really just depends on the person I don't recommend an allocation

[00:38:29] specifically to gold for clients but if they're really adamant that they want they want something

[00:38:33] sure we can do that okay no I was just interesting just the kind of discussion that people will

[00:38:38] or the question are there any other questions that sometimes you get a pretty frequent from

[00:38:43] from clients just like they'll want through your perspective on a certain type of asset that

[00:38:48] I didn't talk about didn't mention it's usually just stocks that have done well recently like in

[00:38:53] video it's popular these days right or Tesla when Tesla was on that crazy run like should I own

[00:38:57] Tesla and this is just the classic investor mistake that that we're all biased to is look at the

[00:39:04] returns imagine that I bought that a year ago how much money I would have made is now the time

[00:39:09] to buy it is it gonna keep going up and a lot of this is just recency bias and and hindsight bias

[00:39:14] in these these sort of standard human errors that we make but inevitably whatever the shiny object of

[00:39:19] the week or the month is we we're gonna get questions about it and that's a big reason why people

[00:39:23] hire folks like us is to keep them in their seat and keep them from making mistakes and that's not

[00:39:27] me making a prediction on where those assets are going to go in the future but it's to keep them

[00:39:32] making rational decisions as frequently as possible about their portfolio and not getting sucked into

[00:39:36] these headlines and news events and that type of thing yeah that's funny you mentioned that because

[00:39:40] I was listening to you familiar with macro alf on Twitter yes actually yeah yeah yeah exactly

[00:39:48] Zitalian and he was I was listening to an interview of him and he was talking about Nvidia and

[00:39:53] saying similar things to you is like it's the neighbor test right because even if you have a good

[00:39:58] portfolio is performed pretty well if your neighbor owns Nvidia and he's triple his money in the

[00:40:04] matter of a year then you're gonna hear that and say why am I not invested in Nvidia so that's

[00:40:11] just bad benchmarking right and so we see we just have clients to do this all the time the S&P is

[00:40:15] up 12% why is it my portfolio 100% S&P 500 right well I mean other markets do better over

[00:40:21] different time frames and if you're diversified you're always going to be upset about some part of your

[00:40:24] portfolio that's that's entirely the point that's that's the risk you are trying to systematically

[00:40:29] kind of diversify away right but I mean remember the people who have conviction and companies like

[00:40:35] Nvidia many of them have the same conviction going into stocks like Peloton and Zoom and

[00:40:39] and the darlings of the of COVID and you get wiped out right so like nobody buys a stock they think

[00:40:44] it's going to go down they buy a stock because they have the conviction that it's going to go up but

[00:40:47] markets can be very punitive and you're not generally rewarded for taking these these big risks on

[00:40:53] individual companies and you only hear about the winners right so yeah and I've been listening to

[00:40:58] an audio book recently and I'm not finished quite yet but he one of the big things he mentioned is

[00:41:04] that since especially the last 20 years or so the stock markets have been really focused on price

[00:41:09] appreciation and less so on the actual businesses and he goes and makes a case for dividends because

[00:41:17] having a dividend and he's talking about obviously sustainable dividends and businesses that are

[00:41:22] growing not necessarily the 78% 10% yielders but he said by doing this you actually make sure that

[00:41:29] you're investing in businesses if they have a sustainable dividend and you're less focused on

[00:41:34] the price appreciation and he mentioned that that is actually you know a potential big problem

[00:41:39] brewing because we're so focused on just the price appreciation you have any take on that I know

[00:41:45] it's a bit of a curveball here but I'm just curious to hear what you think yeah it's interesting I think

[00:41:51] I don't know I think I mean we've talked about dividend investing how focused dividend

[00:41:54] investors get on the dividend to their own detriment sometimes because they're not looking at the

[00:42:00] price appreciation or the depreciation or they're not looking at the total return and you probably

[00:42:03] to your point have people on the other side of that really that are just buying in order to try

[00:42:08] to realize some sort of price appreciation and don't care about the business the profitability

[00:42:12] of the business like if you think about all the companies out there somebody owns all the stocks

[00:42:16] right like every every stock so I often get into these kind of discussions where it's like oh well

[00:42:20] I would have never you know nobody's buying that stock well somebody owns all the shares right like

[00:42:24] not one person but all those shares are owned by people so investors do own all of the shares

[00:42:28] and I'm sure nobody is investing in companies they think are terrible and are going to go down

[00:42:31] at value right but there's gonna be a lot of good companies there's gonna be a lot of bad companies

[00:42:35] and people get fixated on recent price appreciation maybe to their own detriment and they pile in

[00:42:40] at the top and you look at things like arc for example the ETF and it was in my and this is probably

[00:42:45] my own hindsight bias but it was so obvious to me that this thing had to come back down to earth

[00:42:50] and when things like that happen most people lose money because money piles in at the top

[00:42:54] the only reason they're buying is because they see it going up and so more money piles in it

[00:42:57] it becomes this exponential problem where eventually things kind of dry up and it's like musical chairs

[00:43:02] right the party stops and there's just no chairs for anybody so I think an unhealthy focus on only price

[00:43:07] appreciation is probably equal or equally bad to an unhealthy focus on only the dividends right

[00:43:14] this it's the total returns that matter you want to earn or own good businesses over long periods

[00:43:18] of time and if you just earn reasonable returns over very long periods of time you will build wealth

[00:43:23] but people want to get rich today right yeah yeah I mean FOMO is a powerful drug

[00:43:27] yeah yeah yeah it's an advisor like I I experienced my own FOMO when I see these things like

[00:43:33] I tweeted yesterday is like oh the best thing about being an index investor is that I don't care

[00:43:37] about impudence earnings call and then I see it spike after hours and I'm like oh man like

[00:43:41] the FOMO is kicking in you know I do own it it's a big position for me as well because because

[00:43:45] I own the index but you see everybody high-fiving and celebrating because they were you know predicting

[00:43:50] this and had big positions that the FOMO kicks in for real yeah imagine being a high dividend yield

[00:43:56] investor only and not having any stake in Nvidia through index fund so that would be that would

[00:44:01] not be the best feeling and the returns of the market are largely driven by a small subset of

[00:44:05] stocks over time right and so that's the idea behind it X-ings you don't know where the next

[00:44:09] Microsoft appeler and video is out there but they do exist and you want to own them before they

[00:44:14] become the next Microsoft appeler and video you don't want to own them once they're already the biggest

[00:44:18] most expensive companies in the world because typically your future returns are lowered when you buy

[00:44:22] these big expensive stocks so indexing gives you that ability to at least own the next

[00:44:26] market is buying the haystack instead of the needle as I think as I think Vogel said no I definitely

[00:44:31] and now the last question I wanted to talk to you about so like I talked to you before we started

[00:44:36] recording and people know I work in pension and retirement so I don't like to talk about my

[00:44:41] employer because I like to keep things separate although they're well aware of the podcasts but

[00:44:46] essentially we have two plans so we have a defined benefit plan legacy plan and then for new

[00:44:51] employees or employees will roughly in the past 10 years of the fine contribution plan both are

[00:44:56] very generous one thing that I've seen on both ends whether it's the DB or the DC plan is people

[00:45:03] don't have a very good understanding I have also noticed that people tend to equal any pension

[00:45:09] plan to a DB plan that's something I've kind of seen quite a bit and people tend to also

[00:45:16] think that all DB plans are equal are you seeing the same thing because obviously I mean I could go

[00:45:22] on and on about all the differences all the you know the funding ratios and so on but is that

[00:45:27] what you're seeing as well from clients traditionally I'd say yeah like you mentioned earlier I work

[00:45:31] with a lot of physicians and physicians generally don't have a pension plan so it's not something

[00:45:36] that I've had to spend a ton of time with but I do have a lot of clients that have pensions I think

[00:45:41] you're right a lot of people when I ask them like new new clients or whatever do you have a workplace

[00:45:46] plan of subkind and their answer is usually yeah I've got something but they don't often know much

[00:45:52] more than that right so I ask is it like one of those things where when you retire you're going

[00:45:56] to get an income for life or do you actually see your investments and get to choose them and they

[00:46:00] go oh no it's that I get to choose my investments so you're right they do you can plate the idea of

[00:46:04] a pension as being one or or the other without really knowing the differences pensions are great I

[00:46:09] love them I think you have probably a more interesting or even better perspective than I do on things

[00:46:14] like funding ratios and the sustainability of these pension plans but you bring up a good point

[00:46:19] I mean you look at companies like was it Ford I think in the US and Sears Norteil these

[00:46:24] pensioners and these private pensions they got largely wiped out and so some of these are not as

[00:46:28] gold-plated as maybe we think they are but there are I think there's a couple things especially

[00:46:33] in Canada or at least in BC like the municipal pension plans they're pre-funded they're pretty

[00:46:38] well-funded they're like multi-employer pensions I think and so yeah like owners and Ontario yeah yeah

[00:46:43] yeah so they're there I think relatively robust compared to something like Norteil where it's

[00:46:47] like a private plan or something the other thing people can do maybe a lot of people don't know this

[00:46:51] but you can do something called a copycat annuity is that something that's ever that you're familiar with

[00:46:56] uh no I have an idea of like what it is just based on the name but it's uh yeah yeah so if

[00:47:01] you're worried about the health of the pension or the sustainability of the pension

[00:47:05] you can buy an annuity with your pension assets at retirement and it has to look basically

[00:47:10] identical as to what you would have got if you took the pension but you can basically transfer

[00:47:14] the risk of your pension from the pension company and the pension manager is to an insurance company

[00:47:19] in exchange for buying an annuity so that can also be an option for those who are worried about

[00:47:24] the health of their pension plan okay now I wasn't aware of that I guess it must vary from

[00:47:29] pension to pension I'm assuming they would take the commuted value and then bring it to the

[00:47:33] insurer yeah and you have to this isn't something I have a lot of experience with as I mentioned

[00:47:37] because I don't deal with a lot of pensions but the annuity that you buy the copycat annuity

[00:47:42] has to basically be identical to what you would have gotten the pension so you have to work with

[00:47:47] somebody who's done these before you have to work with the insurance company work with your

[00:47:50] pension company work with an advisor or an accountant or a tax lawyer somebody who knows these things

[00:47:55] very very well yeah so it's not something you just want to try and set up yourself but there is a way

[00:47:58] to kind of transfer the risk from the pension to an insurance company yeah and I was talking with

[00:48:02] a colleague of mine too and a lot of people seem to think that a DB pension is guaranteed

[00:48:09] and I always like to remind people that it is a promise and promises can be broken I don't want

[00:48:14] to make people panic obviously but it is a promise and it's not a guarantee and recently we saw

[00:48:21] with the auto workers negotiation I think in Canada part of the one of the things that they gained

[00:48:27] and I will say gained an air quotes because I don't think it's necessarily a gain as they

[00:48:31] had a defined contribution plan then they went to DB going forward and my question was that okay like

[00:48:38] I don't know how the auto industry will look in 15 20 years from now and if I were then I'd rather

[00:48:44] have a good DC plan where I can actually know that the money is set aside and I control the investments

[00:48:51] a promise from a company that there could be a lot of disruption in the next 15 20 years especially

[00:48:57] if you're not in why even if you're retiring in a few years obviously you're going to be receiving

[00:49:02] income from that well that's why a lot of companies have gone from defined benefits to

[00:49:07] define contribution plans right just take the risk off of the employer or the pension company and

[00:49:11] put that risk into the hands of the actual employee and the employer can kind of just wipe their

[00:49:16] hands of it and say hey we gave you the money we contributed what you do with it is your problem

[00:49:19] right so I can see why companies move primarily towards defined contribution plans it's pretty rare

[00:49:25] for companies to go the other way I find from a DC plan to a DB plan so that's interesting that

[00:49:29] they did that yeah I think it's just the current state right where he had workers that had a lot

[00:49:34] of bargaining power with these automakers I think they used that to their advantage by again I feel like

[00:49:41] the leadership of those unions I probably don't have a deep understanding of how pension

[00:49:45] plan works and I think it was maybe misguided a little bit I mean maybe it ends up working out well

[00:49:49] for them but I think there is definitely some risk for the the plan members there and one of the things

[00:49:54] I always mention about the fine benefit plans is they're as strong as obviously the funding but also

[00:50:00] the formula because a lot of people think it's index it could be conditionally index it could

[00:50:05] also have no indexation at all where you're losing purchasing power so that's why I'm always when

[00:50:10] I hear people that don't know a lot about pension plans and they think that DB plans are all great

[00:50:15] you know I'm always I always have a really hard time because I know there's so many differences

[00:50:21] for sure and I think having some kind of you're right like the risks aside right like your

[00:50:26] pension may not be there I think there's a pretty good probability at least for the public pensions

[00:50:29] here that that's not going to be an issue hopefully I will say that many people who otherwise

[00:50:35] wouldn't be prepared for retirement and maybe aren't that financially literate or aren't saving

[00:50:40] enough or wouldn't save enough on their own that pension really does backstop them and this is

[00:50:44] why I love CPP people you know church me on Twitter all the time because I do love CPP because I've

[00:50:49] seen it I've seen retirees who are basically saved by CPP who wouldn't have contributed enough for

[00:50:55] their own retirement otherwise I think for for many pensioners that's that's likely the same so the

[00:50:59] pension puts them in a far better spot the other thing is it's a lifetime pension right so it's a

[00:51:04] longevity hedge if you live to be 110 great you got income coming in yes inflation can be in risk

[00:51:09] yes inflation is capped on some of these plans as well so it might not actually match the CPI

[00:51:15] increases over time but you do often get some inflation protection but the big thing is that you don't

[00:51:20] have to worry about what's going on in your portfolio as much in your portfolio a volatile portfolio

[00:51:25] risky assets doesn't have to do as much of the heavy lifting I told the story to somebody recently

[00:51:29] but my happiest client ever was this this retired doctor and he was in his I think late 80s maybe when

[00:51:35] I took him on but he had taken basically every penny and bought an annuity back in like the 90s

[00:51:41] when interest rates were pretty high and he had something like eight thousand dollars a month of

[00:51:45] income coming in in his 80s and the only other asset he owned was his townhouse and he was the

[00:51:50] happiest client I ever had like we never talked with the markets he didn't care right like you didn't

[00:51:54] really need my help in a lot of ways you just wanted to come and we get a small portfolio right but

[00:51:58] 99.9% of his income came from this annuity and there's actually good research I believe that shows

[00:52:03] that people with a new attized retirement income actually live longer right and that's probably

[00:52:09] just a function of the reduction in stress so I think if you can get some kind of fixed income that's

[00:52:12] guaranteed in retirement you're going to likely have a better outcome in many cases but to your

[00:52:17] point it's a promise not a guarantee yeah and maybe last question on this what do you think about

[00:52:22] viewing CPP as like fixed income in your portfolio when you retire that's kind of what I like to

[00:52:29] view it at I think it's a good way to look at it it is a fixed income it is an inflation adjusted

[00:52:35] fixed income which is very difficult to buy because even annuities in Canada you can't really buy

[00:52:39] as far as I know annuities that are actually indexed to CPI like to inflation you can buy

[00:52:45] annuities that have fixed indexing like it'll go up by 2% per year but you can't actually have an

[00:52:50] an annuity that's tied to whatever CPI is right so CPP is actually pretty much the only way to

[00:52:56] guarantee yourself a real inflation hedged pension for life so it is the definition of fixed income

[00:53:03] and it's probably one of the safest incomes that you can go out and buy because it's a government plan

[00:53:08] so I think it's a good way to look at it yeah and even if you could get it fully index I mean

[00:53:12] obviously the cost would be pretty ridiculous like insurance companies are not stupid right they'll

[00:53:17] hedge accordingly oh of course yeah you're going to pay for it through the nose but the peace of

[00:53:21] mind that that gives you and just knowing that your consumption is kind of locked in at least for part

[00:53:26] of your income and knowing you don't have to worry about that I think can be pretty powerful like when

[00:53:30] we run retirement plans we do that's called the Monte Carlo analysis so you run basically a thousand

[00:53:34] simulations for example that says hey when we're projecting returns they're not going to be linear

[00:53:40] like even if you get 5% on your portfolio you're not going to get 5% per year and the order of returns

[00:53:45] that you earn is going to be really important to your outcome so we run a thousand simulations

[00:53:49] but those that have pensions are fixed income obviously those simulations look a lot better

[00:53:53] most of the time because there's no variability on the returns of that and they can just get

[00:53:57] that fixed income over time and to your point it can allow them to take more equity risk with

[00:54:02] their portfolio because they have this source of fixed income and that can actually provide a much

[00:54:05] better outcome because they have a higher expected return on the portfolio over the longer yeah and

[00:54:10] great book for people want to learn more about that kind of stuff is retirement income for life by

[00:54:15] Frederick a bit test see you know yeah you know the book as he was a former I think had actuary

[00:54:21] of more no ship hell or life works or whatever they've changed your name into yeah there's another

[00:54:26] really good book that is a great book for test books are awesome Alexander McQueen and

[00:54:31] Moshmalewski both Canadians and they've written a book called pensionized your nest egg I want to say

[00:54:37] and it's about this this concept that we're talking about about taking at least you know a portion

[00:54:41] of your retirement and creating some kind of guaranteed income stream out of it at least to hedge

[00:54:46] your fixed expenses in retirement it's a great book no I think that's it pensionized your nest egg by

[00:54:53] Milewski and McQueen yeah that's it yeah yeah so for people interesting but

[00:54:59] no I think this has been a great conversation before I let you go mark do you want to just let

[00:55:03] us know where people can find you and get in touch with you if they're interested sure yeah

[00:55:08] Twitter or X I'm still I'm still not used to calling it XA so yeah so call it tweets that's kind of

[00:55:14] where I hang out most of the time my handle there is at mark McGrath CFP people can email me they

[00:55:20] can look me up on the P.W.L capital website as well my email is m McGrath at pwlcapital.com and

[00:55:27] I'm always happy to chat with people and thanks that was great great to be here and thanks for

[00:55:32] the conversation yeah thanks for coming on Mark the Canadian investor podcast should not be

[00:55:37] taken as investment or financial advice. Braden and Simon may own securities or assets mentioned

[00:55:44] on this podcast always make sure to do your own research and do diligence before making investment

[00:55:50] or financial decisions