These 4 Quebec Rollups have Crushed the TSX
The Canadian InvestorFebruary 05, 2024
350
00:50:1145.98 MB

These 4 Quebec Rollups have Crushed the TSX

Welcome back to the Canadian Investor podcast with your hosts, Simon and Braden! In this episode, they dive headfirst into the captivating universe of Quebec-based rollups, exploring why some of these companies have emerged as the best-performing stocks on the TSX over the last few decades. 

Simon and Braden tackle a burning listener question about covered call ETFs, unraveling the complexities and shedding light on whether this strategy aligns with various investment goals. As the episode unfolds, stay tuned for a thought-provoking discussion on the potential traps of "starter positions" in your portfolio.

Tickers of stock discussed: ATD.TO, QQQ, QYLD, GIB-A.TO, TFII.TO, WSP.TO

Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com

Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast!

Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools.

Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

[00:00:00] This is the Canadian Investor where you take control of your own portfolio and gain the confidence you need to succeed in the markets

[00:00:10] Hosted by Braden Dennis and Simon Belanger

[00:00:14] The Canadian Investor podcast

[00:00:18] Welcome into the show

[00:00:20] My name is Braden Dennis as always joined by my favorite French Canadian, Simon Belanger

[00:00:27] The reason you're getting that today is we're going to talk about Quebec in the first segment today

[00:00:33] But you're also wearing red. You're like in the spirit of the show today, brother

[00:00:37] Looking good

[00:00:39] Yeah, I mean i'm excited for this one

[00:00:41] I think it'll be a fun episode a lot of it for at least what i'm going to be talking about is

[00:00:46] Coming from the listener question. So uh something that I know you'll chime in

[00:00:51] I think we have a similar kind of approach to that. So it'll be fun too after the uh, the whole Quebec, Quebec segment

[00:00:58] Dude, I so you and I are just talking about we got to do our joint tci.com

[00:01:02] Updates go go support the show. We do our monthly portfolio updates on the first of the month

[00:01:07] And i'm sitting on

[00:01:09] way too much cash

[00:01:11] And I don't know like I have a bit of decision paralysis here and I got like

[00:01:16] I gotta figure it out here man. I don't be like me like I let four or five like kind of dca's

[00:01:23] Go into the go into the account with no action

[00:01:26] And now i'm just sitting on all this cash and I I I messed up, dude

[00:01:31] Don't be like me like I've been complacent over the last like

[00:01:35] Three or four months with deploying cash. Luckily, you know

[00:01:38] The things that I do own have been working really well

[00:01:41] But don't be like me. Is it like just because you're too busy or valuations are too high or like, you know not

[00:01:48] And like I know you have a lot of ideas when it comes to investing

[00:01:52] but maybe not like any ideas that like is

[00:01:55] Screaming by right now

[00:01:57] I don't think I've had a slam dunk new idea that I have a lot of conviction in and like

[00:02:03] Four or five months ish and you can and and that shows

[00:02:07] My portfolio like to see which is totally fine

[00:02:11] Like I think last year

[00:02:12] My main my main thing was to just like be even more concentrated than I that I already am and

[00:02:18] And I think I did that quite well and the results

[00:02:21] worked but

[00:02:22] Yeah, man. I think I just got to turn over some more

[00:02:26] More new leafs, but valuations have

[00:02:29] Certainly become less attractive like I was pretty excited about a lot of stuff early last year

[00:02:35] and

[00:02:37] Things are just ripping again and it's not just tech

[00:02:40] Like everything is kind of ripping right now. I just saw a constellation hit

[00:02:45] 80 billion in market cap on the tsx as of today

[00:02:48] Like, you know, holy things are going up and to the right

[00:02:52] Yeah, and you're uh, you posted a tweet. I can't or a necks or whatever

[00:02:57] Whatever we want to call it but you posted something about like a video about a market commentator

[00:03:03] Saying like talking about the high valuation and making up this new kind of way of looking at things

[00:03:09] Yeah, that one I thought was good because

[00:03:12] It definitely feels like things are when you start hearing stuff like that on like cnbc or bnn whatever it is

[00:03:20] it's it feels a lot like stuff when things are extremely bullish and

[00:03:26] Near the top. I mean, I'm not saying it could go on for months

[00:03:30] If not years, we don't know but it's just a way the things you start hearing. It's like, okay

[00:03:35] Everyone seems to be like on this one end of the spectrum

[00:03:39] There was kind of warning bells that go in my head. No, don't take this as I'm not investing

[00:03:43] I'm still dollar cost averaging a lot of it with index funds

[00:03:46] So it's not like I'm not investing is just something I notice as well for context

[00:03:52] I think she was the head of research of

[00:03:54] I think it was morgan stanley. It was it was one of the bold bracket investment banks

[00:03:59] I think it was morgan stanley

[00:04:02] If it wasn't it was one of the other major this wasn't someone, you know, just off the street

[00:04:07] this was one of the head of research of one of the major big investment banks and

[00:04:12] She said you got to pay up for quality and we're actually using a new metric called

[00:04:18] price to innovation

[00:04:20] P.i

[00:04:23] Price to innovation and you know, of course I rolls everywhere because how do you quantify that?

[00:04:30] You can't it is a justification for buying frothy. Shit is what priced innovation is

[00:04:37] You know move over price to earnings

[00:04:40] Uh, this is priced innovation

[00:04:42] You should you should use that when you do another uh funding round with uh finch dad and just say our price to innovation is

[00:04:50] We have the lowest price to innovation of any

[00:04:53] You know venture back startup you can find I I feel like you'll be laughed out of the room if you say

[00:05:00] I mean, I'd hope so. I mean if i'm dealing with that someone knows what they're doing. I'd hope so

[00:05:04] Yeah, kathy wood

[00:05:07] Walked so the morgan stanley person could run. Yeah

[00:05:13] They go on cnbc

[00:05:15] Say some outlandish crap

[00:05:18] Get a lot of assets under management

[00:05:20] profit

[00:05:21] Step one two and three laid out. All right. Let's talk about quabec based rollups today

[00:05:27] So this is my first segment of the day and you were born

[00:05:31] When did you move across to the ontario border to ottawa? You were born in quabec

[00:05:37] Yeah, on a more permanent basis about 10 years ago. Okay. I thought it was longer than that. Okay, so okay got it

[00:05:44] So

[00:05:45] We're gonna play a game called

[00:05:48] Which quabec based rollup? See mom last time we did this was which badard. I don't know if you remember that

[00:05:54] It was a lane badard. Oh, yeah versus the versus connor badard

[00:05:58] This is which canadian based rollup. I got five questions in four companies

[00:06:02] So I didn't want to make it too easy

[00:06:05] But didn't want to take too long

[00:06:06] So the companies that we're talking about today are kush tarp ticker atd

[00:06:11] Cgi ticker g i b I think it is tf inter tfi international ticker tf ai and wsp global ticker wsp

[00:06:22] now

[00:06:23] These companies have been monster performers and they all share something in common. They have roots

[00:06:30] Based in quabec

[00:06:32] And they buy a lot of companies. They are rollups. They buy

[00:06:38] this

[00:06:39] Fragmented industry that they operate in kush tarp its convenience stores for cgi. It's tech consulting for tfi international

[00:06:47] It's trucking and for wsp

[00:06:49] It's civil mostly civil engineering firms around the world

[00:06:53] So here you go first ones mom this company aided the european space agency's rosetta mission

[00:07:00] And has been involved in the launch of over 200 satellites

[00:07:03] Gonna go cgi for this one. Correct. The only tech company on the list

[00:07:08] Correct. In fact, they have been involved in space. I didn't know since the 80s. And so that that's been an interesting fun fact

[00:07:17] in

[00:07:19] 1987 this company purchased

[00:07:22] Seven jurors a chain from metro which they have kept that brand intact to this day

[00:07:30] Yeah, that's an imitation kush tarp. I'm pretty sure correct

[00:07:34] They've moved over almost everything to silk okay, but there's a few brands that they've kept in quabac local to their roots

[00:07:42] Yeah, I think I vaguely remember

[00:07:46] Maybe seeing that brand when I was like a kid

[00:07:49] I don't think they have them anymore very rarely and yeah for the most sorry

[00:07:54] Haven't been I haven't like kept an eye on it in terms of what brand they use the most in kebek

[00:07:58] I'll have to let you know next time. I go max

[00:08:01] Yeah, they used to have the

[00:08:03] They used to call it just kush tarp. It's just kush tarp right that's the yeah, yeah kush tarp

[00:08:08] Yeah, they just would call it but the same like I think they had the same owl. Does that is that late night?

[00:08:13] What is that? How does that transit late night? Yeah late night? Yeah, okay

[00:08:17] Apparently the logo or it goes to bed late. Yeah, depending. Okay. God

[00:08:22] Apparently the logo was like I was looking on wikipedia. Good old wikipedia

[00:08:25] And apparently the logo used to be like a like a person who was like sleeping

[00:08:30] Yeah, yeah, you know, that's right. Okay. I've never seen that but you know, okay, you can verify

[00:08:35] Uh since 1988 this company has acquired 195 companies

[00:08:41] And have completed an acquisition on every continent of the earth except for

[00:08:47] Like except for Antarctica, but I had to look because there was every single I found one

[00:08:54] acquisition that filled all seven minus Antarctica continents on earth

[00:08:59] And yeah, if I had to guess probably WSS WSP on that one, correct. Yes, they are probably the most global from

[00:09:08] That make kush tires. They're all global except for tfi

[00:09:12] A management team is

[00:09:14] infamous for showing up unannounced

[00:09:17] To audit the operations of their company on an individual location basis

[00:09:21] Well, I'm gonna go with the last one standing here tfi. No tfi. This is kush. No, this is kush tarp

[00:09:28] They are infamous for going to

[00:09:32] the locations these convenience stores

[00:09:34] and being meticulous

[00:09:37] About the operations meticulous about how they're run meticulous about the optimization

[00:09:43] Of the stores and they still do it today allegedly even after, you know, all these years

[00:09:49] And yes, there's one standing here in 2021 this company did a car val tfi

[00:09:55] Ha ha ha

[00:09:56] 2021 this company did a carve out that literally doubled their top line and ebida in one

[00:10:03] Deal that was to yeah, wasn't that the ups last mile deal? Is that it? That's exactly right. They carved out that things

[00:10:11] Ltl from ups freight and now if you notice you might notice this

[00:10:15] Next time you get a package from ups and they give you that tracking number

[00:10:20] It's still branded ups if you click on the tracking in the footer in the small text

[00:10:26] It'll say ups

[00:10:28] ltl or sbs freight for go to this is

[00:10:31] owned and operated by by tfi international

[00:10:35] So you'll still see, uh, you know

[00:10:37] ups still doing your last mile delivery there in terms of the branding

[00:10:41] But it is owned and operated by tfi which I think is quite interesting

[00:10:45] So see mom here's some some graphs some some visuals and some data on how this group these these four companies have done because it's been

[00:10:54] tremendous since the the time where they've all been public at the same time, which is

[00:11:01] 2006 may 25th 2006 so around 17 and a half years

[00:11:06] Wsp has compounded at 22.8

[00:11:10] Percent for a total return of 3,703 percent

[00:11:15] tfi has compounded at 18.6 percent a total return of

[00:11:21] 1,945

[00:11:23] cgi has compounded at 18.4 percent for you know almost 2000 return kustard almost another 2000 return at 18 and a half percent

[00:11:32] Kaggle so those those have been almost identical

[00:11:35] If you invested that that day a 10 000 into equal weighted 25 25 25 25 portfolio your 10 000 would be worth

[00:11:46] 309,541 dollars today

[00:11:50] since ipo

[00:11:53] these

[00:11:54] companies have compounded in this case of of kustard over 34 years

[00:11:59] for

[00:12:00] 493

[00:12:02] 1000 percent one of the best performing stocks

[00:12:06] Of all time of all time

[00:12:09] Not just in canada of all time around across the entire globe

[00:12:14] absolutely fantastic you've had monster returns yet over 100 000 percent for

[00:12:20] cgi so 10 100 bagger and

[00:12:23] 43 000 percent for tfi

[00:12:26] 3700 percent for wsp it's been public the least the least longest and then

[00:12:33] This last graph here that I have here is just on finch out just graphing out their operating income of all of them since they've all been public

[00:12:41] in may

[00:12:42] 2006

[00:12:44] This is why these companies have done well. It's not some magic fairy dust that the investors love these companies

[00:12:52] It's the fact that every single one of them have compounded operating income

[00:12:57] Eps free cash flow per share whatever metric you want to use at double digits for multiple decades

[00:13:04] That's all like the stock has follows the weight of gravity with these companies and the results have been

[00:13:12] Tremendous, so what can we learn from this one quabac based roll-up seem to be very good at capital allocation

[00:13:19] The management team for these companies have been around for a long time a lot of times it's still run by the founder

[00:13:26] and many

[00:13:29] At least two out of the four I'd have to look at least for elaine bidard and

[00:13:34] And I'm forgetting that kush tards guy's name. What's his name?

[00:13:38] Elaine bouchard not to be confused with elaine bidard. That's right. That's that's forgetting

[00:13:44] So they're you know, it's it's management team skin in the game good at capital allocation and patient

[00:13:50] kush tard turned down an deal to buy something for 22 billion. They got outbid by 7 11

[00:13:56] Instead of fomoing and trying to you know cp cpc and rail them. They just said okay

[00:14:01] That's that's too much. We'll move on and so these these companies are very good at capital allocation

[00:14:07] Yeah, I don't know about cgi because i'm not as familiar with their business

[00:14:11] But the other ones I mean, I think one thing that's interesting is they also are sticking to what they know, right?

[00:14:17] Yes, they are roll-ups

[00:14:19] but they're not

[00:14:21] Starting to buy businesses that don't really make sense with their operations. They tend to stick to what they know

[00:14:28] That's right. And they've stuck to their vertical good point

[00:14:32] They've stuck to tucking in stuff. They understand and that they can they can you know find some synergies

[00:14:38] And they've been so patient like this has happened over multiple multiple decades

[00:14:42] And they've been meticulous about the operations when you're buying these kind of distressed fragmented industries

[00:14:49] You're gonna if you're if your value buyers in like trucking or convenience stores

[00:14:54] You're gonna be buying a lot of junky operation sometimes

[00:14:57] mom and pop shops

[00:14:59] Same with the waste consolidators. I didn't include them because I'm not really sure where waste connections is from

[00:15:05] I know gfl is mostly here. So yeah, nothing else to add if you have any comments

[00:15:10] I'm all here for it. No, I think that was uh, that was a fun little one

[00:15:16] So the the next segment here and I know you'll want to chime in a bit

[00:15:20] So, you know, just let me know when you want to chime in

[00:15:23] It's a question for brian that came in

[00:15:26] I reduce a question just to make it a bit shorter for the podcast

[00:15:29] But I kept the essence of it. So I currently his question starts off

[00:15:32] I currently have about 60 of my portfolio managed by an advisor and 40 self-directed

[00:15:39] My advisor has recently suggested to move a significant portion of my holdings from a high growth fidelity global innovators fund

[00:15:48] That heavily tracks the nasdaq to a covered cally tf the horizons nasdaq 100

[00:15:54] He says that it's much less volatile and still reaps a lot of the upside since the nasdaq had huge gains in 2023

[00:16:03] And may experience slower growth and or volatility this year. I don't fully understand what a covered cally tf is

[00:16:09] So i'll give my take i'll explain what a covered cally tf we have in the past none of this is investment advice brian

[00:16:18] Yeah, no exactly well done. I was gonna say that but you beat me to it

[00:16:21] And obviously that this is just our opinion again. We don't know your full financial situation

[00:16:27] We don't know how much, you know, what kind of investor you are what your risk tolerance is

[00:16:32] These are all things that hopefully your advisor if he or she is a good advisor

[00:16:37] They they are well aware of but it's a question the covered call we do get

[00:16:42] Relatively often because they tend to yield quite a bit

[00:16:46] So anything you want to add before I explain the mechanics of that? No, I just

[00:16:51] I don't want to be critical of of any financial advisor and I know a lot of people come in with questions

[00:16:58] And we don't know the entire context of the advice given

[00:17:02] but

[00:17:03] anytime

[00:17:05] You're told

[00:17:07] We got to rotate out of this because it's done too well

[00:17:10] Is some of the most idiotic statements i've ever heard like it truly is if we were to just zoom out

[00:17:19] And every time amazon or apple hit a all-time high as you sold the stock. It's done too well

[00:17:26] You would have missed out on life changing wealth. I'm not saying, you know nazdax in for another 40 rip

[00:17:32] But the constituents inside this company inside this index are doing very well. They dominate our day to day

[00:17:40] so

[00:17:41] You know that is what I call

[00:17:44] trimming the flowers and watering the weeds

[00:17:47] Which is a recipe for underperformance in my humble opinion. So that's that's my only comment so far

[00:17:53] Okay, no, that's good. And that's fair and I'll give my take towards the end here

[00:17:57] I mostly agree with what you're saying, but I'll actually give some

[00:18:00] actual numbers to back that up

[00:18:02] So I think it'll be really interesting

[00:18:04] So first of all, what is a covered call etf if you're new to investing?

[00:18:09] You may have encountered these ETFs and a lot of newer investors get attracted by them because they

[00:18:16] tend to pay

[00:18:17] High single digits even double digit yields. So a covered call etf means that the fund managers

[00:18:23] Sell call options against the stocks that are held in that etf

[00:18:27] So a call option gives the right to the buyer of the option to purchase the stock add in agreed upon price for a set period of time

[00:18:35] When a covered call is sold the buyer pays a premium

[00:18:38] Which then goes to the seller so one call option that that's important to know as well gives the right to purchase 100 shares

[00:18:45] So their contracts of 100 share

[00:18:48] They're always sold in these lots of 100 now. I'll give an easy example

[00:18:52] To make sure that it's easier to understand just a second here. I believe braden is playing with the page

[00:18:58] So it's making a little bit harder. Maybe not. Were you? Oh man, I always forget the classic move

[00:19:04] Yeah, the classic move. What is this episode?

[00:19:08] 450 cmo

[00:19:10] Yeah, 350 350 that's a good that's a good reminder. This is episode 350. I've done this

[00:19:17] 350 times, you know minus a few day and

[00:19:21] appearances

[00:19:22] And I still mess with the dock to cmo's frustration and like, you know

[00:19:29] Dude, I I applaud you for putting up with 350 episodes of that

[00:19:35] It's all good. I you know hadn't started the example so it doesn't break the train of thought

[00:19:39] So it's all right now the example. I'll try to simplify it as much as possible

[00:19:44] It's not the real price. Keep that in mind. I tried to use just some easy numbers

[00:19:49] So it's easier for people to wrap their head around it or rewind if they want to re-listen what uh

[00:19:55] What I'm saying and to that example

[00:19:57] I'm also not going into things like time decay for example when it comes to options feel free to go on

[00:20:05] Investopedia if you want to understand what that is. So I'm really trying to keep it as a a more basic level

[00:20:11] So I have 100 shares of microsoft which are currently trading at $100 each

[00:20:16] I decided to sell one call option because it's 100 shares

[00:20:20] So it's a lot of 100 to braden the call option gives the right to braden to buy 100 dollars

[00:20:28] shares my shares of microsoft

[00:20:31] At a price of 110 dollars for the next six months now

[00:20:36] The reason why it's a bit higher typically that's why like options will be sold

[00:20:40] So the strike price so the 110 dollars will typically be higher than what it's trading at

[00:20:47] Now for that right braden pays me a premium of two dollar for each share

[00:20:52] So 200 since the contract is a hundred share if the price of microsoft stays below 110 dollars

[00:20:59] Then braden won't exercise the option and I'll pocket the 200 dollars and still have my microsoft shares

[00:21:05] That's because if it stays below 110 dollars

[00:21:08] Why would he exercise that because he can get them at a cheaper price on the open market?

[00:21:14] It's that premium that two dollar premium per share that generates the income

[00:21:18] And this is the best potential outcome that I just said if you're doing a covered called strategy

[00:21:24] Is you're essentially looking at

[00:21:27] Either a flat market or a bear market

[00:21:30] So that's typically, you know the best outcomes because you're still getting that premium so it helps your return

[00:21:37] On the other hand say microsoft rips and the price is 150

[00:21:41] So I ended up making 12 dollars a share that's because the initial

[00:21:45] Initially when I sold the call option the shares were 100 dollars and then the option

[00:21:50] A strike price was 110 dollars

[00:21:53] So that means I sold my shares to braden for 110 dollars and made 10 dollars profit plus that two dollar premium for

[00:22:01] Total of 12 dollars per share the issue here is I capped my upside

[00:22:06] Is because if I just held on to the shares and did nothing did not

[00:22:11] Sell options nothing like that. I would have made 50 dollars profit per share during that time period or 38

[00:22:19] More per share compared to the call option. So when it's a covered call etf, it's the same logic

[00:22:25] It's just done on you know

[00:22:28] Hundreds of stocks that are essentially the underlying component of the etf

[00:22:33] And the biggest issue with covered calls is like I said, you're capping your upside

[00:22:38] But you're reducing your downside as well

[00:22:41] Historically and I will go over these numbers. It has not produced good returns compared to their non-covered calls

[00:22:48] Counter parts. So I decided to choose a different etf

[00:22:52] But it's very similar to what brine was referencing just because the one that

[00:22:57] It was referencing just started being traded in mace

[00:23:01] So I looked at the qqq which is the nazdaq 100 etf

[00:23:06] I think it's 20 percent zero point two percent management expense ratio

[00:23:10] So quite low and then the other one I compared it to is the qyld which is the covered call version

[00:23:17] So the returns I'm talking about they are the total returns that includes the distribution or dividends

[00:23:22] So it does factor in those premiums that I was talking about that generate income with this fund

[00:23:27] Anything else you want to add before I go over the numbers. No, you've covered the basis here, right?

[00:23:33] In a basket of etf. It's just them doing this on tons of stocks basically

[00:23:38] Exactly now if you looking back at 10 years

[00:23:43] QQQ has had annual returns of 18.43 percent clearly, you know tech and big tech in particular has done extremely well over the last decade

[00:23:53] So if you had a ten thousand dollars investment, you'd be be worth a bit more than 54,000

[00:23:59] During that same period the covered call version qyld would have returned 7.43 percent annually

[00:24:06] And a ten thousand dollar investment would be worth 20,400 dollars

[00:24:10] So now you're seeing that clearly there's some big differences in return now to be fair

[00:24:17] I tried to look I tried to really find periods where the covered call

[00:24:23] Was actually performing better just to be fair looking at different time periods

[00:24:27] So I decided to do a one-year return from may 2019 to may 2020

[00:24:33] The reason I chose that is because of course we had the kind of market crash that happened in march of 2020 during that

[00:24:40] time period

[00:24:41] So I figured it's probably gonna help out the covered call etf not really so qqq return

[00:24:49] 36.24 percent and qyld return 5.66 percent

[00:24:54] So what what happened here is that the returns

[00:24:58] During that time period for qqq so the lead up to the correction the returns were so much greater than qyld that even the

[00:25:07] Fag that qyld would get those premiums and even during the downturn

[00:25:12] It really didn't help the returns and obviously by may of 2020

[00:25:16] We were already back in a bull market. I think at that point now if we drill down even more

[00:25:22] And try to really capture the worst of the pandemic through a six month period

[00:25:26] So I decided to do september 23rd 2019 to march 23rd 2020 march 23rd was actually when the s&p

[00:25:33] 500 and naztac bottom at the onset of the pandemic

[00:25:37] So during that time period qqq return a negative 10 and qyld return a negative 16.5 percent

[00:25:45] so qqq still outperforming

[00:25:49] During the shorter time period and me even trying to find a way to get qyld to outperform

[00:25:57] Now I narrowed down even further and this is the last one here. Let's look at february 23rd to march 2020

[00:26:07] At a one month basis and I don't think it got really much worse than that

[00:26:12] So qqq was down 23.5 percent and qyld was down 20.9 percent

[00:26:18] So it did outperform in that one month period

[00:26:21] But it's the only instance in the last ten very

[00:26:25] Not by a wide margin like it didn't exactly save you from a huge drawdown. You still had a few you still had a massive drawdown

[00:26:33] Yeah, exactly and these are total returns now maybe in the last 10 years or war or some little time periods that

[00:26:41] qyld ended up doing better aside from the one that I just found

[00:26:44] I mean I was trying to look for the most obvious one

[00:26:47] But typically people will also old funds for more than a month period

[00:26:52] So that's the other thing to consider here that it's not super realistic to think about it this way

[00:26:58] Now to be fair to your advisor

[00:27:00] There's definitely a case to be made that maybe the snp 500 nasdaq are currently highly valued

[00:27:07] I mean we talked about it at the beginning of the episode

[00:27:10] It's not impossible that if the nasdaq goes sideways or enters a bear market for an extended period of time

[00:27:16] That the covered call etf will outperform and in theory

[00:27:20] that's when it would outperform is you have an extended

[00:27:25] Like period of time where the market is essentially flat or in a bear market

[00:27:29] We just haven't seen that in the past 10 years

[00:27:32] So in theory it could happen. I have no way of knowing what the future holds neither does braden

[00:27:36] Maybe it will outperform better

[00:27:38] I mean all we can do is look at back and testing this data and that's what I did

[00:27:43] The historical data is clear though and it hasn't performed well versus the qqq now a couple of things I'll finish on here

[00:27:50] So in terms of you these are good question for anyone looking to invest looking to

[00:27:56] Kind of look under investment from a critical standpoint. Just these are questions to ask yourself

[00:28:01] Are you looking to maximize your return over a long period of time 10 plus years?

[00:28:06] Maybe you're closer to retirement you have you'll need the funds in a few years

[00:28:10] So these are all different things you have to factor in and may influence the type of investment you'll be in

[00:28:15] Are you okay with volatility? Would you panic sell in the case of 20 percent 30 percent 40 percent drawdown?

[00:28:22] Maybe having that extra income even though it won't outperform longer term from a psychological basics

[00:28:30] Maybe it will prevent you from doing some mistakes and selling at the bottom for example

[00:28:35] Are you looking to draw income on your investments?

[00:28:38] And even then I mean you can argue that you can just trim your position and get some income from that

[00:28:43] So those are questions that you need to ask yourself bradden and I can't answer that because you know, we have a risk tolerance

[00:28:50] We are young. We still have a lot of time while bradden's young. I'm starting to be middle-aged here, but

[00:28:56] You're a young lad

[00:28:58] I'm a little young lad. Yeah, but I mean

[00:29:02] The reason I think it's important these are all like important questions to ask yourself

[00:29:06] I think also for people just looking at investing in only dividend stocks

[00:29:10] I think the only case that I think the strategy is worthwhile is from a

[00:29:15] psychological benefit because a lot of the time these strategies tend to underperform the index

[00:29:21] And I'll just finish on fees

[00:29:22] So make sure you look at the fees for each of the funds because that will be an important part of maximizing your returns

[00:29:28] Covered call ETFs will generally be higher fees because it requires some active management from the fund managers

[00:29:36] For the covered call of strategy. There's also more trading involved because they're buying

[00:29:40] They're selling options. Sorry. So there is some more fees involved

[00:29:44] For example, just um going on memory the qqq. I think it's 20 basis points

[00:29:48] So 0.2 percent and the qild I think it's three times that so 0.6

[00:29:54] percent

[00:29:55] So keep that in mind because these are all different factors to consider

[00:30:01] If you'd like this strategy personally, it's not one for me

[00:30:05] But again, I know a lot of people we get that question quite often. So I thought it would be

[00:30:12] Good to to bring him back at the forefront here. There has been a gigantic rise in

[00:30:19] Products that these companies are spinning up to sell to investors. They are investment products

[00:30:27] because for the most part

[00:30:30] all of the basic indices have

[00:30:34] Competed down to zero or on fees like you get these broad based like s&p 500 funds for like five basis points

[00:30:42] Like 0.05 percent and then they look out of the universe on things that they can create and generate fees from that is their business

[00:30:51] These types of instruments

[00:30:53] Yes, they can provide income

[00:30:56] Do they

[00:30:58] provide

[00:30:59] A sound investment strategy

[00:31:02] No, not really

[00:31:04] I think

[00:31:06] Most of this stuff I I feel more and more like charlie munger where it's just gone

[00:31:11] We are wasting smart people's talent in the financial industry making this crap

[00:31:19] Because it is it's crap and that's that's

[00:31:22] It just is it's the truth. It's a lot of crap

[00:31:26] There's there's and they're and we're making more of it every single day with these fund providers

[00:31:31] You know, yes, you can get income

[00:31:33] but let's

[00:31:34] Let's just step back logically for a second the same way

[00:31:38] That it is a

[00:31:39] Silly mistake to only buy high yield stocks

[00:31:43] Even if you're looking for income with that out of the way

[00:31:47] Even if you're looking to you know

[00:31:50] Sit on a beach and have a bunch of dividend companies pay you cash

[00:31:53] Nothing wrong with dividends

[00:31:55] Something wrong with that strategy and the main reason for that

[00:31:59] is

[00:32:00] treating a company like an instrument that pays you a yield

[00:32:06] That is its sole purpose. I buy this ticker. It pays me income

[00:32:11] That is a company you are buying equity in it is not some imaginary

[00:32:18] Stock twicker you buy on your discount brokerage and they pay you although it does feel like that

[00:32:22] That is a portion of the profits of that opera that business operation is giving to investors

[00:32:30] And the reason they're giving that money to investors in the form of a dividend

[00:32:34] Is because they don't have a way to spend it all and get a return inside of their business

[00:32:41] So when you get really really high yielding stocks really high yielding companies

[00:32:46] That is a signal that the company has reached maturity

[00:32:49] And that is a signal that the management team is letting investors know

[00:32:54] We don't have a good enough way to invest this within our company

[00:32:59] That we think it's better to sit on your balance sheet instead of ours

[00:33:04] That's what a dividend is and so

[00:33:08] Lot of companies like think of visa for instance

[00:33:11] They produce more more cash than than they can possibly know what to do with same with apple

[00:33:17] And so they pay a conservative and growing dividend as their business grows

[00:33:21] But they make sure since they're able to achieve

[00:33:24] 20 plus percent return on invested capital of dry powder that investors give them and that the cash they generate

[00:33:31] It is in their investors best interest to deploy it

[00:33:36] And be a steward of it at a higher rate of return than you can

[00:33:41] That's why you own the equity, right? Like like let's let's not like outsmart this stuff

[00:33:47] It's just it's just very basic and and

[00:33:52] These products

[00:33:53] Are told to convince investors

[00:33:56] That it you know, there has to be something complicated here to earn income

[00:34:00] If you want to own income just buy good businesses that pay you dividends and hopefully the dividend is growing

[00:34:04] I think all this stuff is crap. I've never owned any of it and I've never will

[00:34:08] Yeah, and buybacks would be similar

[00:34:10] So they're looking to return money to shareholder

[00:34:12] It's just doing it in a slightly different way instead of giving you cashed or

[00:34:17] Giving you essentially a bigger share of the companies. That's what they're that's what they're doing

[00:34:21] So that's why buyback yield one of the metrics we looked at in the last episode

[00:34:26] That's one that we mentioned because it is a good indicator of how they're returning shareholder or money back to shareholder

[00:34:33] When looking at buybacks and I mean when it comes to covered calls

[00:34:37] It just feels especially something as

[00:34:40] You know as high upside as the NASDAQ. I think that's a fair statement to say

[00:34:45] It just feels like

[00:34:47] You're really it's an asymmetric bet

[00:34:50] So there's the upside is way higher than the potential extra safety that you're

[00:34:57] Getting with doing a covered call

[00:34:59] So it's costing you more in the long run. That's a sense. Well, I mean, that's what the theta tells us at least historically

[00:35:06] Is you're capping your upside for a little bit of downside protection

[00:35:10] But that downside protection is really not proportionate to the amount of upside at hot

[00:35:15] investing

[00:35:16] Is

[00:35:17] Simple but not easy

[00:35:20] In essence, the idea is simple. The execution is difficult

[00:35:26] These types of products

[00:35:29] Create complexity

[00:35:32] With a result that doesn't lead to success

[00:35:36] Like I I did

[00:35:38] Hey, do you want to pay more fees and have worse performance? Like

[00:35:43] I don't know. It's not a proposition that I'm willing to go for

[00:35:47] And you said that and the other thing too like I think that to me would be a basic if your advisor's

[00:35:54] suggesting a new investment

[00:35:56] They should be able to explain to you what that investment is

[00:36:00] Yeah, like that to me would be a basic and you know

[00:36:04] It's I think it was a great question from brian

[00:36:06] But that would be the question I'd ask the advisor is

[00:36:10] Why were you not able to explain this to me how a covered call dtf is and if he or she is not able to explain that

[00:36:18] Then there's

[00:36:19] Some warning bells that go on at least for me because you're recommending products that you don't even understand yourself. Yeah, this is

[00:36:27] People yeah, yeah like

[00:36:29] The finance world and I know because I'm in it

[00:36:33] They're my customers at finch act. I talk to them all day

[00:36:39] I

[00:36:40] I know how they operate. I know what they work. I know how they make money

[00:36:44] They're

[00:36:46] incentivized over time

[00:36:48] To complicate things

[00:36:51] It's just it is just built in the incentives

[00:36:54] And you you can't sound smart if you just tell your customer to buy your cosco every month, you know like

[00:37:03] Just buy a cosco every month and sail off into the sunset

[00:37:06] Like has been a way better take than buy complex

[00:37:12] high fee instruments

[00:37:14] But that's too simple

[00:37:16] Right, and then how are you gonna earn your fee if what you're saying?

[00:37:20] Is too simple right like the incentives don't make sense, but we could go on and on about this

[00:37:26] Yeah, yeah, I think I think we've gone on long enough. So let's do your next segment here

[00:37:31] Oh

[00:37:32] well, I was I got all riled up here from complexity and investing and

[00:37:38] I'm gonna I'm gonna stay on that same topic. We record here on Tuesday afternoon Simone and I

[00:37:44] And this is hot take Tuesday a new segment

[00:37:48] Hot take Tuesday. This is called why starter positions suck

[00:37:53] I

[00:37:55] I really mean that I was asked on a pretty big podcast. I was on a guest. It's it's not released yet

[00:38:02] So I'll leave it at that, but when it's out, I'll link it. I was asked

[00:38:07] do

[00:38:08] you use starter positions and

[00:38:10] I realized on the spot when I was asked that I actually do have a hard opinion on the concept of

[00:38:18] Of starter positions and because at first it seems like a harmless concept

[00:38:23] A starter position is a term investors use

[00:38:27] For new companies in their portfolio

[00:38:30] For adding a small allocation as they continue to learn more about the business

[00:38:36] Overtime I used to think that this is a good call starter positions. Do you use the the world of starter positions?

[00:38:42] I mean, I would say like I'm not I read your segment. So not in the way you really

[00:38:48] You really mentioned it. I mean, I'll usually have conviction in the company. I know where you're going

[00:38:54] For I mean my I've been kind of I think in our

[00:38:57] New year's resolution, right? That was one thing that I've kind of noticed

[00:39:01] That was a something I wanted to remove from my portfolio is that I had a tendency sometimes to start a position

[00:39:08] I knew the company well, but then I'd get like hung up on the valuation and never add back to it again

[00:39:15] And then it would remain like just a really small position in my portfolio

[00:39:20] So that's what I'm trying to avoid. I know you're you're talking about slightly different

[00:39:25] So I'll I'll let you continue on that. Yeah, because you mentioned just a few words in there that was

[00:39:32] Very different than my issue with starter positions

[00:39:36] Which is you knew the company really well already

[00:39:40] Some investors including professional money managers will often cite that they are

[00:39:45] motivated and have and when they have skin in the game to continue to build

[00:39:50] Conviction in the company once they already have

[00:39:53] A star a quote-unquote starter position

[00:39:56] Now in theory, I'm on board for this idea as you learn about the company

[00:40:01] You gain confidence and conviction and you increase your position size

[00:40:06] I'm in theory totally good with that like that that thought process is very instructive

[00:40:13] And I think matching position sizing with with conviction is actually a wonderful way to manage a portfolio

[00:40:20] And it's how I run my own money is managed conviction with position sizing

[00:40:24] I also believe that a small waiting for a new name

[00:40:29] Is a totally rational and reasonable decision that you can add to over time

[00:40:34] So in theory starter position two thumbs up so far

[00:40:38] However

[00:40:39] With that out of the way

[00:40:42] Did you see that?

[00:40:45] What is with uh

[00:40:47] Google meets is doing this too. I just gave two thumbs up on the on the thing. Oh now there's fireworks

[00:40:51] And then fireworks just happening because we really stuff

[00:40:55] So if if you're on join tci, it'll be a way of happening

[00:40:59] Right now

[00:41:00] With that out of the way

[00:41:02] Here why starter positions are a trap. It's a conceptual and behavioral bias that I see in starter positions

[00:41:09] One they can be and often are used as an excuse to enter position

[00:41:14] That's not well understood which is not what you were describing there

[00:41:18] The hurdle rate or bar for x this is I think what you might have been talking about though

[00:41:23] The hurdle rate or barful bar for excellence in the portfolio is lowered

[00:41:29] Since new positions could just fly in and out of there right like, you know, the bar is lowered

[00:41:35] And shiny object syndrome and over trading become

[00:41:40] Prevalent next thing, you know, you own 58 stocks. You have low conviction low waiting

[00:41:45] See what if you ever see 58 stocks in my portfolio

[00:41:49] You smack me you you come to Toronto you smack me over the head

[00:41:54] You go into my brokerage

[00:41:56] We buy we sell everything we buy low cost index ETF. You buy me a plane ticket with my money. Don't worry

[00:42:03] To a beach where I'm locked out of my brokerage forever

[00:42:07] Like if that ever happens you promise me you will do that because I've seen this so many times

[00:42:13] And I think it can may it can work for some but that is a

[00:42:18] unwieldy proposition for a self-directed investor to own understand

[00:42:24] and

[00:42:25] Be an equity shareholder in 58 individual companies

[00:42:29] like

[00:42:31] That is a gigantic undertaking. So now I've laid out what's theoretically right with starter positions

[00:42:38] And why I think that they're actually a trap and how they're often used

[00:42:42] I'm here to present a better way. Simone. I'm here to present

[00:42:46] A better way any any comments so far on the three issues I've laid out with with starter positions

[00:42:53] Uh, no, I mean for me. I think it would probably be the opposite where

[00:42:57] If my position is too small, I tend to lose interest in it. Yeah

[00:43:03] It's yeah, it's yeah, it's just like it's not needle moving enough

[00:43:07] And that's a reason why I want to just build larger positions in general. So for me, it's a bit of the opposite

[00:43:13] But again, yeah, usually when I've been guilty of doing kind of starter position quote-unquote

[00:43:19] It's just because I found a decent entry point from evaluation perspective from my point of view

[00:43:25] And then valuation went up and I was like, okay, I should

[00:43:29] Should have you know had that

[00:43:31] Bigger starter position whatever you want to call it and that's what I'm focusing on and that's what

[00:43:36] Little kind of teaser for joint TCI for our next update. So

[00:43:40] Started one position in particular. That's already, uh, you know a decent size. So I'm trying to

[00:43:46] To follow what I've been saying at the beginning of the year

[00:43:49] Nice and so we can both agree that in theory we like the idea of a starter position

[00:43:56] But the actual problem is it is around the behavioral biases that come with that because

[00:44:04] A starter position is the idea of I'll figure it out as I go

[00:44:08] and

[00:44:10] Accre's focus fund lays out two types of positions they have in their portfolio

[00:44:15] They have a core position

[00:44:18] So you know what that means a core position is

[00:44:22] High-weighting something you know really well. It's probably been in the portfolio for at this point many many years

[00:44:28] You know continue to add to it

[00:44:31] It's in that never sell category right now because the thesis is intact

[00:44:35] And the business is executing and you're happy as a clam as a shareholder

[00:44:40] So that's a core position a workbench position

[00:44:44] It as accre calls it is

[00:44:47] I have full thesis in the business on day one of original purchase

[00:44:51] I have no intention of selling it but the current

[00:44:55] valuation or the current conviction

[00:44:58] Or market forces may not make sense for further accumulation and increasing the weight

[00:45:04] So it doesn't mean you haven't done the work on day one

[00:45:07] It just means that like for me for asml

[00:45:11] Like I bought the stock as I like a workbench position and it like doubled in like the next six months

[00:45:17] I'm like, okay. Well now. I don't think it's as attractive. I love the business

[00:45:21] But I can't underwrite even close to the same irrs over the next five years

[00:45:27] And so now these two things might seem like semantics

[00:45:30] But in practice I find that they're very different and they have a different hurdle for greatness

[00:45:36] It's kind of like the punch card concept, right? You don't you have 20 trained

[00:45:40] Tickets on your part punch card and you don't want to waste them. And so you only

[00:45:47] You only swing when there are pitches

[00:45:50] Coming across the plate of ideas that you've fully kind of fleshed out and fully thought of

[00:45:55] And have full conviction in them. So this is uh, this is my hot take Tuesday on

[00:46:01] Why starter positions?

[00:46:03] In the way that they're used I think suck

[00:46:06] Yeah, no, I mean I I think it's uh, it's a valid point of view

[00:46:10] I mean, I do understand some people that for them it's an extra incentive to keep learning

[00:46:15] Hopefully

[00:46:16] You know for those who do do this they have a decent understanding of the business before doing that

[00:46:22] Starter position. I think that's probably the caveat I would put and then do a bit more

[00:46:27] Kind of further digging. Yeah, but starting just you know, not barely knowing anything about the company

[00:46:33] And then doing a starter position. I'm not sure that would be the way to go at least for me

[00:46:38] Your last segment here. Should we say it for next time? I'm so intrigued of what this is. Should we say it for next time?

[00:46:43] What do you think?

[00:46:44] Yeah, yeah, we can do it for for next time

[00:46:47] Okay, well

[00:46:48] We'll keep both me and the listeners on their toes for this one because I'm very

[00:46:53] I saw tick talk in in here and that got me a little bit uh, a little bit interested here

[00:47:00] Yeah, no, it's more of a personal finance segment, but I think it'll uh, it'll be fine next week

[00:47:06] Have you been sleuthing tick talk on for personal finance tips or what?

[00:47:10] Uh, no just I get entertained most of the time if I go there once in a while

[00:47:14] But I have this like, you know, I don't have really a profile. So it's just this basic like, you know

[00:47:21] KYD

[00:47:22] 75

[00:47:23] WX like that's my username. Yeah, you're just a uh, what do they call that a lurker

[00:47:29] You know when you're not a lurker, you're not a poster. You're a lurker. Yeah

[00:47:33] Yeah, yeah

[00:47:35] Not a boy I

[00:47:37] Don't have the app on my phone because I'm full tinfoil hat

[00:47:41] conspiracy of

[00:47:42] Oh, you think China's gonna oh, yeah

[00:47:44] spy on oh, yeah big time like I saw one youtube video about it

[00:47:48] And I was like, I don't need to do any more research because what if this youtube guy is right?

[00:47:54] you know like

[00:47:55] What if I mean what I could you know find a conflicting opinion, but what if he's right?

[00:48:01] I don't even want to know full tinfoil hat

[00:48:05] Hey, that's uh, you know conspiracy theories sometimes

[00:48:09] They end up not to be conspiracies. So I'm not saying always, but sometimes they're not so yeah

[00:48:15] Whether there's smoke there's fire as they say

[00:48:18] That's that's one thing I tend to live by and it's like don't read everything you see on the internet

[00:48:23] Don't read you know seeing is believing always double check and verify

[00:48:28] But whether smoke there's usually fire or at least like a small like maybe fire

[00:48:35] Or at least questions to be asked

[00:48:38] Thanks for listening to the pod. We appreciate you you can support the show at join tci.com

[00:48:43] You can support the show also by supporting

[00:48:47] our

[00:48:48] podcast advertisers that come on the show, you know you hear you hear me here simon

[00:48:53] You know talking about our advertisers. We appreciate our advertisers the reason we're able to do this still 350

[00:49:00] Episodes in and have motivation to continue to continue to provide awesome content

[00:49:05] So go ahead and support our advertisers and if you've been listening to the show and think

[00:49:10] Hey, maybe I'd like one of the hosts to read an ad about my business

[00:49:16] Especially if it's based in canada the audience is what like 95 percent canadian simon

[00:49:22] Roughly a bit lower 92. I would say yeah, so almost entirely canadian

[00:49:28] Yeah, no, I like high like low 90s of 5 u.s

[00:49:32] And the rest of the world yeah, you have a canadian brand or you work for a large canadian company and you think hey

[00:49:39] This is a good audience to get our our name out there or a good audience to get some conversions

[00:49:45] You can go to our website and fill out a little form to reach us at the canadianinvestorpodcast.com

[00:49:51] We'll see in a few days. Take care. Bye. Bye

[00:49:53] The canadian investor podcast should not be taken as investment or financial advice

[00:49:59] Braden and simon may own securities or assets mentioned on this podcast

[00:50:04] Always make sure to do your own research and do diligence before making investment or financial decisions