In this episode, Simon and Dan start by discussing the recent CPI data from both Canada and the US and explain why the Bank of Canada will have a tough decision to make at its next June meeting.
They then discuss the announcement that Tesla will be laying off at least 10% of its global workforce and why New York Community Bank might still be in trouble despite getting a 1B cash infusion a month ago.
Simon and Dan also discuss the earnings of MTY Food Group and JP Morgan.
Stocks discussed in this episode: MTY.TO, JPM, TSLA, NYCB
Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com
- Our Website
- Canadian Investor Podcast Network Twitter: @cdn_investing
- Simon’s twitter: @Fiat_Iceberg
- Braden’s twitter: @BradoCapital
- Dan’s Twitter: @stocktrades_ca
Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast!
Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor
Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor
Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools.
Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
[00:00:00] Welcome back to the Canadian Investor podcast. I'm here with Dan Kent. We're back for a regular
[00:00:21] earnings and use episode released on Thursdays. It's actually a special episode today because
[00:00:26] we are both not sick, which is pretty amazing. I can't remember the last time it must have been 2023
[00:00:33] that we recorded without one of us losing their voice, coughing, runny nose, do you name it? Yeah,
[00:00:41] probably a variation of a virus. It definitely hasn't been any time in 2024, that's for sure.
[00:00:47] Yeah exactly. So we won't chit chat too much because we do have a whole lot on the slate today.
[00:00:54] The most freshest news is Canadian CPI coming out this morning. We also have the budget coming out
[00:01:01] later today at 4pm, so the federal government budget. We're recording before that but I think
[00:01:07] it'll be interesting just to keep an eye on what's happening there, but probably next week we'll
[00:01:11] touch on it a little bit for the next Thursday episode. But do you want to get us started
[00:01:16] for the Canadian CPI? Yeah, so Canadian CPI was released this morning. It rose 2.9% on a year-over-year
[00:01:24] basis. It looks as though most estimates were predicting it was anywhere from 2.9 to 3.1,
[00:01:31] so for the most part it came in below targets. When we take out gasoline prices, which they
[00:01:36] typically like to do just because they're so volatile, CPI actually declined on a month-over-
[00:01:41] month basis coming in at 2.8%, whereas in February it was 2.9%. So sounds like a broken record, but
[00:01:48] shelter and rent costs are driving a huge chunk of the inflation here in Canada, so shelter prices
[00:01:55] increased by 6.5% year-over-year. And the mortgage interest cost index, which we had discussed this,
[00:02:01] I'm pretty certain this would be just total mortgage costs. Yeah, it's increased in mortgage
[00:02:09] costs for homeowners. Yeah, I couldn't find an actual definition on it, but 25.4%. So that is a huge,
[00:02:18] huge increase when you factor in the amount of pandemic mortgages that are coming up for renewal
[00:02:23] and are being re-signed. It really isn't a huge surprise though. Rates are way higher than they
[00:02:27] were three years ago. I think the only thing that would slow this down at this point is
[00:02:33] like a material decline in interest rates. I mean, even if they lower it by say 100 or 150 basis
[00:02:40] points, a lot of mortgages over the last, that have had to come to say three, four-year fixed
[00:02:44] term mortgages, they would still be quite a bit higher because I believe most of the variable
[00:02:49] rate costs would be well absorbed by now. I mean, there hasn't been a hike for quite some time.
[00:02:54] Yeah, yeah. And I mean, people also don't realize that even if the Bank of Canada reduces
[00:03:00] rates, there's no guarantee that the five-year bond or the shorter end bonds, even anywhere in
[00:03:07] between that and the five year, there's no guarantee that it'll actually be reduced because those are
[00:03:13] decided by the bond market. Obviously, I know the Bank of Canada could intervene and start
[00:03:18] quantitative easing again to try and level out the prices of those bonds. But at this point,
[00:03:25] there's no guarantee if they cut rates that it will result in the five-year bond to get lower.
[00:03:30] And if the five-year bond doesn't get lower, it means that five-year fixed rates will remain
[00:03:36] elevated despite the BOC cutting rates. Yeah, because it's ultimately what they lend that.
[00:03:41] In reality, like when you could get a guaranteed return like that on a bond. But rent prices
[00:03:46] continue to accelerate. So they're up 8.5% year over year. So this is a 0.3% increase from
[00:03:53] February. Alberta, where I'm at is witnessing some absolutely crazy increases in rent prices.
[00:04:00] So 20% plus increases in rental prices. So this is like more than double the average 2.5x
[00:04:08] what rent prices increased. And I was going to a story, I can't remember the exact figures,
[00:04:13] but I was listening to the news. I believe it was yesterday or this weekend and they had one
[00:04:17] lady in Calgary, she was up for renewal on a fixed term lease with her rent. And we don't
[00:04:22] have a rent cap here in Alberta. So you can do whatever you want. And her landlord gave her
[00:04:27] notice of a $900 increase in monthly rent. So I mean, this is probably why we're seeing the
[00:04:37] fastest rental increases in the country. I mean, does like, is there caps?
[00:04:42] Well, there's also a lot of interprovincial migration happening going towards Alberta.
[00:04:47] So I think that's probably a big of cause. So there, I would assume and Dan and Nick on the
[00:04:52] Canadian real estate investor podcast are better, are better versed than I am on that.
[00:04:58] But I know there's been migration towards Alberta. And obviously that's going to put price,
[00:05:03] you know, pressures with prices upwards. And then you add in the fact that some
[00:05:08] landlords are probably seeing their costs spikes. So they're using that as an opportunity
[00:05:14] probably oftentimes just break even, right? Yeah, pretty much. I mean, $1300 rent seems pretty low
[00:05:21] for anything these days. But yeah, the real estate market overall here is just bonkers. I had a
[00:05:27] friend who just purchased a house probably a week ago and within 24 hours there was,
[00:05:32] he had to offer over list. There was six offers, I think it was in like 24 hours,
[00:05:37] which is unheard of here. Like typically you would see that like, you know, in Ontario and
[00:05:42] stuff. But Alberta, yeah, it's pretty interesting our market here. But it's the new Ontario.
[00:05:48] Yeah, exactly. But interestingly enough, the Prairie provinces were actually the only ones to
[00:05:54] report month over month declines in inflation. So Manitoba went from 0.9% to 0.8%, which is
[00:06:02] crazy low. I haven't really paid much attention to Manitoba and how they're doing. But Saskatchewan
[00:06:08] was 1.7 to 1.5 and Alberta was 4.2 to 3.5. So it's still pretty high here in Alberta,
[00:06:15] I would imagine it's that impact of shelter and mortgage, things like that.
[00:06:21] Gasoline was up 4.5% in March, whereas it only rose around 0.8% in February. This kind of makes
[00:06:29] sense like crude oil has kind of been on a pretty big rip since the start of the year.
[00:06:33] It's up quite a bit. I mean, the global tensions right now, all that type,
[00:06:37] can't see crude going down anytime soon. But who knows? On the food side of things,
[00:06:42] prices went up 3% year over year with the cost of food purchase from grocery stores
[00:06:46] increasing by 1.9%. I'm not exactly sure what they mean by that. Like overall food up 3,
[00:06:51] but grocery stores 1.9 maybe just... Yeah, they're probably in the US. So they're probably
[00:06:56] doing something similar to the US where there's like food at home and food away from home.
[00:07:01] So basically food that you purchase at restaurants and then versus food they actually purchase
[00:07:05] at the grocery store. That would be my uneducated guess on it. It makes sense.
[00:07:12] Meat prices were up 3.4%. Bakery products 1.3% and vegetables up 2.5%. So it kind of seems like food
[00:07:20] is slowing down whereas kind of the narrative last year was... What was it? It was like at
[00:07:24] 8% or 9% I think. It was just crazy. Yeah, well it was definitely high single digits for sure.
[00:07:29] Which is pretty much the one area of inflation. I mean, shelter costs as well,
[00:07:33] but it impacts absolutely everybody pretty much. The markets are now pricing in a 70% chance of
[00:07:39] rate cuts coming from the Bank of Canada in June. This is up from 50% in March,
[00:07:43] but it has been fluctuating quite a bit. I pulled this from an article. I'm not exactly sure where
[00:07:48] the data is coming from, but I can imagine it's from just currency or interest rate swaps.
[00:07:54] Yeah, probably the Bloomberg terminal getting some data based on those right there.
[00:07:58] Yeah. But overall it seems like most things have settled down, but higher rates pretty much continue
[00:08:04] to pour gas on the fire just due to our mortgage structure, especially relative to the United States.
[00:08:10] Although the Bank of Canada could mitigate some of this with interest rate cuts,
[00:08:14] I think they need a lot of cuts pretty fast to put a ton of relief in terms of shelter and rent.
[00:08:22] But I mean that brings on a whole other element with how well the US is doing despite higher rates.
[00:08:27] So yeah, your thoughts? Yeah. I mean, I don't have too much to share aside from what you said,
[00:08:34] but a couple of things I noticed. The first one is CPI, so core CPIs. So you have CPI comments,
[00:08:41] CPI media and CPI trim. They're just essentially, they're the measures that the Bank of Canada
[00:08:46] uses the most. I believe median if I remember correctly, that one is essentially you look
[00:08:52] more at the middle increases. So you kind of remove the extremities. So the most volatile stuff
[00:08:58] on both ends of the spectrum. And then the trim, I'm not quite sure I'd have to go back,
[00:09:03] but essentially there are just variations of CPI data used by the Bank of Canada and they
[00:09:10] really focus on that. So in terms of those, they actually have declined. So from 3.1 to 2.9%
[00:09:18] on a year-over-year basis for the CPI common, the CPI median from 3 to 2.8 and then the CPI trim for
[00:09:26] from 3.2 to 3.1. And on a future episode, I can probably go over each of them. I'd have to do a
[00:09:33] refresher myself because I looked at those definitions probably years ago. It's just,
[00:09:38] it's not super complex, but I know they just remove certain things for each of them and
[00:09:43] we'll have different readings based on that. So those are trending lower. Definitely some good
[00:09:48] news there for the Bank of Canada for inflation as a whole. But then on the part that's not as
[00:09:55] good in terms of news is the services. So services remain really sticky at 4.5% you over
[00:10:01] year and 0.7% month-over-month. Month-over-month is especially concerning here because that would
[00:10:07] be without going into a lot of complicated math, 0.7 times 12. So you'd have around 8.4% in terms of
[00:10:16] the annualized rate and then services is really proven to be sticky not only here in the US as
[00:10:21] well. So that's something that I'm sure they're keeping a close eye on. It's going to be interesting
[00:10:27] what they decide to do at their next meeting. There's a lot of competing forces here involved.
[00:10:34] Whatever they decide to do, whether they decide to cut or stand still, I think at the end of the
[00:10:38] days you're trading off. So you're probably, if you stand still, you're probably going to
[00:10:46] put the brakes even more so on the economy. If you cut rates, you really risk having a bigger
[00:10:51] diversions between Canada and the US possibility. If you cut too much that you weaken the Canadian
[00:10:57] dollar and then you start importing inflation because costs of goods with major trading partners
[00:11:03] including the US starts rising over time. I was looking at some data too from the 1990s because
[00:11:09] there was a pretty big diversion back then between the BOC and the Fed rate. I think it was above
[00:11:15] 200 basis points and the Canadian dollar didn't suffer too much back then but the economy was
[00:11:23] very different. So the Canadian economy first of all, the federal budget was actually in a
[00:11:28] surplus position during that period of time which is not the case now. There was also Canadian businesses
[00:11:35] that were very competitive compared to their peers including the US. So that encouraged money
[00:11:40] flowing into Canada and therefore supported the Canadian dollar despite having a pretty wide
[00:11:47] gap. So I think there's a lot of elements that are not in place right now that were back
[00:11:52] then that would make it a lot trickier for the Bank of Canada if they decided to widen
[00:11:56] that interest rate gap with the US. The one thing that could be beneficial is obviously natural
[00:12:03] resources so commodities including oil if prices keep going up there's going to be more demand
[00:12:08] for the Canadian dollar so that could offset it a little bit but that has traditionally been
[00:12:13] something that has offset kind of created additional demand for the Canadian dollar.
[00:12:19] Yeah I think we especially saw that like after the financial crisis too because
[00:12:24] Canada rates were higher than the US plus oil just went on a huge run. That was back when like you
[00:12:29] could get par money. I remember when I turned 21 we went down to Vegas and it was uh could get
[00:12:36] pretty much I think we actually got more US which was crazy but it would take quite a bit to
[00:12:44] get back to that. The one thing about services inflation is I imagine wages would have a big
[00:12:50] impact on that. I mean overall because that yeah definitely which I mean there's a lot of like
[00:12:55] getting labor right now is pretty difficult especially at like good prices like people are just
[00:13:01] commanding more money just because of the cost of living so that creates I could see services
[00:13:06] remaining sticky for for quite a while. Yeah and we have a service heavy economy as well right
[00:13:13] so I think if I remember correctly it's around 50% of CPI that's actually services
[00:13:18] obviously there's different types of services like they always categorize right in different
[00:13:23] grouping so there are you know if you take energy and then you compare it to gasoline
[00:13:28] obviously energy includes gasoline. Gasoline is a subcategory of that so I think it's just
[00:13:33] important for people to remember when they look at the more granular data there are these big
[00:13:38] categories then there are subcategories if you want to isolate them a bit more.
[00:13:43] While we're on the CPI might as well talk about US CPI that came in last week so in the US CPI
[00:13:50] actually rose 3.5% year over year the increase was more than expected so we're starting to see
[00:13:56] the divergence here between like you just say Canada where it came in cooler than expected
[00:14:00] and the US hotter than expected rose 0.4% versus February so that brings us to about
[00:14:08] 4.8% on an annualized basis services rose 5.7% again aligns with what we're seeing in Canada
[00:14:15] services are being pretty sticky there as well food came in at 2.2% year over year energy was
[00:14:22] up 2.1% year over year so this is the one that I think could really put a wrench into the headline
[00:14:28] US CPI and Canada as well like you mentioned right if energy prices keep going up that
[00:14:34] it will put upwards pressure on inflation at least the headline number obviously not the core
[00:14:40] number which strips it out if the prices keep trending up it would really put that that pressure
[00:14:46] upwards and we'll have to see obviously with the developments happening in the Middle East
[00:14:50] you know I think everyone's hoping that there is you know some kind of positive development
[00:14:56] where you know things kind of settled down a bit more I think that's what I'm hoping I think
[00:15:00] that's what I'm hoping I think everyone is probably hoping that as well so we'll have to see
[00:15:05] obviously with the escalation we saw on the weekend who knows what will happen there and if
[00:15:10] there is more escalation then I think there's a good case to be made that it will put some pressure
[00:15:16] on oil prices core inflation in the US came in at 0.4% on a month over a month basis so again
[00:15:23] that would be 4.8% annualized so core is similar to the ones in Canada they essentially strip out
[00:15:31] food and energy because they consider that more volatile but it does give them a better picture
[00:15:38] I guess of where the inflation is actually trending with removing those volatile elements
[00:15:44] and no doubt that they'll be considering that and a bunch of other factors at their next
[00:15:50] rate to high decision following the print the CME FedWatch tool went from 60% chance of a rate cut
[00:15:58] in June to 20% that's something I mentioned quite a bit and again like you you referenced you know
[00:16:05] the odds of a rate cut in Canada following the print similar thing for the CME at FedWatch
[00:16:11] tool I don't know what goes into all of it to determine the percentages but they are
[00:16:16] essentially you know based on derivatives that the CME has in terms of what the market is trading
[00:16:23] and based on that they kind of put some expectations what I do find interesting is there's a 0% chance
[00:16:31] hike I don't want to scare people here but I don't think it's a 0% chance it's probably a small
[00:16:37] probability but in the US Jerome Powell I think it's well documented that he's you know he
[00:16:44] wants to almost be the Paul Volcker of nowadays Paul Volcker Paul Volcker was the head of the
[00:16:50] Federal Reserve back in I think in the late 1970s and 1980s and he's the one who really got inflation
[00:16:57] under control during that period of time but he definitely cranked up interest rate extremely
[00:17:04] high to get that so I think I think the market personally is a bit off here because I don't
[00:17:09] think it's accurate to put a 0% chance even if you pay a set at 1% in coming meetings
[00:17:14] but all that to say that you know the hotter than expected CPI print in the US really
[00:17:21] flipped the odds I mean now even in the July meeting which I think is probably the last
[00:17:27] meeting that they'd be able to cut rates before the election because the September meeting
[00:17:33] that one if they started cutting then it would not be a good look it would kind of
[00:17:38] raise questions about the independence of the Fed at least that's how Republicans I'm sure would spin
[00:17:43] it so for the July meeting there's a 53% chance of no change and 46% chance of some kind of cut
[00:17:52] so that has changed dramatically and if we remember basically going back to last year
[00:17:57] there was almost a certainty that they would like start cutting in June and now we're seeing that
[00:18:03] there's the odds are against that massively against that so it kind of shows how things have changed
[00:18:10] and it doesn't really like none of the data really supports a cut I guess in a way like
[00:18:15] it's I mean in Canada does like definitely more so but here the US is actually doing quite well
[00:18:21] all things considered I did look up as you were talking I looked up the that Fed watch tool so
[00:18:26] they use Fed fund futures contracts to pretty much calculate out these percent changes so probably
[00:18:34] just the pricing changes in those contracts things like that but yeah it's the US is looking pretty good
[00:18:40] I would imagine the same thing maybe in Canada that the services the 5.7% increase I mean it's
[00:18:46] probably due to wage growth and actually when we go over a Canadian company reporting earnings
[00:18:52] later that operates in the US like the California I think they've raised minimum wage it was pretty
[00:18:58] high I think it's like $20 an hour or something like that but that's actually okay impacting
[00:19:04] the company will speak of so yeah okay wage growth is definitely coming into play
[00:19:10] yeah exactly so I mean it's definitely something to keep an eye on you know there's was also the
[00:19:15] Bank of Canada rate announcement and to no surprise they stood path at 5% with the overnight
[00:19:21] rate they're still looking to see continued downward momentum in core inflation which we just saw with
[00:19:28] the CPI print so I guess that's a checkbox at least a semi-checkbox I guess we'll have to see what happens
[00:19:35] for this month when it's released in May they want to see inflation expectation moderate as well
[00:19:42] as wage growth and corporate pricing behavior Tiff got a question about cutting rates in June
[00:19:47] and said that it was within the realm of possibility although I think it's important to just note here
[00:19:53] a lot of people you know a lot of headlines were showing like you know all possible rate cuts in
[00:19:59] June and so on but the way was I watched the whole press conference and the way that he was
[00:20:05] talking and Carolyn Rogers the I think senior deputy chief of the Bank of Canada is they have
[00:20:12] a lot of outs if they don't want to cut like it's no certainty in my mind they are I think
[00:20:18] they're weighing everything obviously they're keeping an eye on the housing market clearly I think if prices
[00:20:24] start going up pretty significantly I think that was lessened the chance of rate cuts in June I
[00:20:31] think that's something they're keeping an eye on they don't want it to get out of hand
[00:20:35] especially if they cut rates and he was also asked about the US CPI data if that impacted
[00:20:41] their decision making said that he didn't have the chance to look at the data that was released a
[00:20:46] few hours earlier that morning because they are focused on domestic developments I think that's
[00:20:51] pure BS because they are absolutely weighing US CPI data they would be stupid and you know
[00:20:59] not doing their jobs if they weren't I think they just it was related to a few hours before
[00:21:05] maybe they had access a bit earlier with you know back channels I don't know maybe they just
[00:21:11] wanted to take a step back and really look at the US CPI data but there's no chance that they're
[00:21:17] you know they're not aware of it 100% they are aware of that if the BOC rate is much lower obviously
[00:21:22] than the the Fed like we mentioned like I talked about earlier it could weaken the Canadian
[00:21:28] dollar and I think that is something that they are keenly aware of and they are weighing in their
[00:21:35] interest rate decision for I think June is the next one if I remember correctly right
[00:21:40] yeah yeah it would be June the one thing just before we move on to Tesla but so yeah California
[00:21:48] April 1st went from 16 dollars an hour to 20 so that's a huge jump in minimum wage like
[00:21:56] in like a state that is pretty much bigger than the entire country of Canada so that's definitely
[00:22:02] gonna have it's gonna have an impact for sure people may think it's like automatically a good
[00:22:08] thing I'm not saying that it's bad or good but I think it's important to remember if you're
[00:22:15] business owner and your costs go up what like 25% roughly that would be it pretty much overnight
[00:22:23] yeah overnight 25% maybe you'll start investing in certain things that will help you limit the
[00:22:29] amount of employees that you have or maybe you'll start reducing the amount of hours and finding other
[00:22:34] efficiencies so I'm just mentioning this because you know businesses are there to make money
[00:22:40] and if you know there's a big shock like that or a big increase to their costs they
[00:22:46] will probably start looking at ways to reduce those costs so I think you we always have
[00:22:50] to be careful I think minimum wage obviously there's a reason they're there but I think
[00:22:56] I don't know 20 bucks is pretty steep yeah yeah like when you think of that on a Canadian that's
[00:23:03] almost 28 bucks an hour I think 27 28 bucks an hour so my calculation it's like 55 but yeah
[00:23:10] yeah like that's that's fast food places too like you imagine like a like a fast food
[00:23:15] joint here in Canada paying somebody 28 bucks an hour well your food away from home is gonna rise I
[00:23:21] can say yeah exactly yeah but yeah you want to move on to Tesla yeah let's do it so Tesla the
[00:23:28] important news mostly was layoffs so they ended up laying off over 10% of its global workforce
[00:23:35] yesterday morning so when I was reading estimates I think I had messaged you maybe the night before
[00:23:41] but they they figured that it could be as high as 18 to 25% and I think that would have been like
[00:23:46] alarmingly high I mean 10% is definitely way below what was expected and actually yeah like
[00:23:53] at least 10% that there might be more cuts to come or something like that yeah the estimates
[00:23:59] ranged anywhere from like mostly 18% on the low end to 25% on the high end and I think they
[00:24:05] have 140,000 employees so like 25% would just be a huge layoff and I can't remember where I heard
[00:24:13] this data from but there was I believe is a podcast I'm not gonna mention any names because I don't
[00:24:18] know who was from but they did they dug in a bit and suggested that the first wave of layoffs
[00:24:24] is typically never the last like there's typically always a second smaller wave of layoffs so maybe
[00:24:30] that would get Tesla to this you know 18% mark that is projected but I mean that's never a guarantee
[00:24:38] another interesting element is the fact they're going to be scaling back hours at their
[00:24:41] Cybertruck facilities and this seems pretty odd because I'm pretty sure Musk was talking about
[00:24:47] how the Cybertruck was more of like a production constraint rather than a demand so scaling back
[00:24:53] the hours kind of seems a bit puzzling yeah that was one of the shows that we one of the
[00:24:59] first shows we did together I think you were talking about that is and I remember listening to
[00:25:05] to Musk as well where it was really I think the logistic behind it was a big challenge yeah
[00:25:12] he said something about the Cybertruck being like the death of something I can't remember
[00:25:16] what it was but he wasn't yeah he wasn't very I think he also talked about that on the
[00:25:21] Joe Rogan's podcast because they were doing like shooting arrows I think to the Cybertruck to
[00:25:28] show how like borderline bulletproof it was and one of the things he said is like designing a truck
[00:25:35] is not the hard part the production is the hard part oh yeah I uh I was actually reading up on that
[00:25:41] Cybertruck they you it's something like a 400 mile radius or a 400 mile distance or whatever
[00:25:47] but you can buy like a battery extension but it takes up like a third of the box so I mean
[00:25:53] you take away like oh it's just it seems like I'm gonna get a 2002 Ford Ranger that's what I want
[00:26:00] yeah I want it a little bit of rust not too much rust yeah that's the kind of truck I want
[00:26:06] oh it's uh yeah Tesla's I mean it's in a pretty rough spot right now I mean sometimes you'll see
[00:26:13] the market react positive to layoffs like a lot of the time you know cost cutting thing like that
[00:26:18] but I think like Tesla is still very much priced as a high growth company so the layoffs are
[00:26:23] coming as certainly a sign of it slowing down the stock took quite a hit I think it was down 5%
[00:26:30] maybe yesterday and it's as we're filming this is down about another four and a half today so
[00:26:35] another you know near 10 dip back in 2022 Musk said that he had a bad feeling about the economy
[00:26:41] and the job and the job cuts were coming so fast forward a couple years later and here we are
[00:26:47] the stock is down 55% since the start of 2022 the S&P 500 on the other hand is up 7% the company's
[00:26:55] senior vice president Drew Baglino resigned as well so he's been with the company for nearly two
[00:27:01] decades I think it was 18 or 19 years and I mean see it really seems like it's going from bad to
[00:27:07] worse for Tesla they're facing some pretty intense competition in China it's continually cutting
[00:27:12] prices you know yet deliveries are still sinking it kind of seems like everybody had the money to spend
[00:27:19] you know on expensive EVs back in the pandemic but now that financing costs and overall cost of
[00:27:24] living are up about demand or vehicles are falling and I think Musk he actually spoke about this
[00:27:28] outright too he's like you know when you know in the pandemic when the actual financing portion
[00:27:35] of the vehicle makes up you know a hundred dollars out of a thousand dollar payment it's
[00:27:39] not too bad but when it starts to you know make up half the payment like or a big chunk of the
[00:27:43] payment like people just can't can't afford it and I think in general like I think you know
[00:27:50] investors are starting to lose a bit of confidence in Musk as well he's running you know six companies
[00:27:55] at what point do they maybe consider you know bringing in somebody who can dedicate their
[00:28:01] entire efforts to Tesla I don't I'm not sure yeah yeah I mean I think it also shows there's
[00:28:06] yeah the man like you said is just slowing down it's still you know growing on a year over year basis
[00:28:13] as a whole I know in Canada and I'm pretty sure in the US as well for EVs but I think it's slower
[00:28:18] than a lot of analysts was expecting a lot of people were projecting you know a few years ago
[00:28:24] so I think that's a big issue I mean I think it's well documented the infrastructure although
[00:28:31] it's improved a lot over the last few years is just not it's just not there like it's not I mean
[00:28:39] you don't have to look very far just look at how easy it is to fill your car with gasoline
[00:28:44] and you know how common gas stations are and you don't have to wait it's convenient
[00:28:51] and then think about an EV which is fine if you're just kind of doing city stuff where you can
[00:28:57] always you know charge it back home but as soon as you you know start traveling you know longer
[00:29:05] distances on a relatively frequent basis that's where it becomes an issue yeah I think there's
[00:29:10] an element of like the the infrastructure for charging too like I remember back in January here
[00:29:16] in Alberta when we had like that minus 60 something spell like they pretty much sent out a warning
[00:29:21] of potential rolling blackouts because like they couldn't they were telling you like unplug your
[00:29:26] cars things like that it's actually pretty like I'm in a in a newer neighborhood with not a lot of
[00:29:32] developed houses and literally almost everybody around me owns a Tesla oh we're like we're in
[00:29:37] Alberta like we got like I know we got like a 2013 escape and a Volkswagen Jetta on the driveway
[00:29:43] and everybody else is Tesla's like it's crazy how many are around I got a Jetta too and it's
[00:29:49] perfect it's 2017 I can guarantee you it's not on the list of the most stolen cars
[00:29:55] which is perfect because the insurance premium is lower that's how you solve it you just get cars
[00:30:00] that they don't want to steal or EVs right because I think a lot of those cars end up in Africa so
[00:30:06] I'm gonna go on a limb and say they don't have a lot of EV charging stations so that's another
[00:30:12] option there yeah yeah it's I don't know what's gonna happen with Tesla it's uh the one thing
[00:30:19] that will be I imagine we'll talk about it actually I would almost guarantee we'll talk about the
[00:30:22] earnings which I think are April 23rd I think somewhere around there which would be Tuesday but
[00:30:30] I believe it would be the Tuesday hopefully it's pre-market I'm not sure yeah it's okay we'll
[00:30:35] we'll talk about it the next week if it's to uh if it's after hours but we'll we'll keep going
[00:30:40] here I think you did a great overview of what's going on with Tesla and obviously some of the
[00:30:44] at least near-term troubles they're having and speaking of troubles we have NYC so New
[00:30:50] York Community Bank there's an article on CNBC last week that came up saying that my banking direct
[00:30:58] the online only banking subsidiary of New York Community Bank was offering 5.5% on their
[00:31:05] high yield savings account so the rate is available on normal savings account and only
[00:31:09] requires $500 deposit the money is not locked in for a period of time like a CD a CD is just
[00:31:16] equivalent of GIC in the US the article from CNBC which I will link in the show notes pointed out
[00:31:22] that it is the highest paying savings account in the US and keep in mind the US has thousands of
[00:31:28] banks most of them being regional banks not the massive you know GP Morgan city bank of America
[00:31:36] and I decided to pull up the holdings of the KRE Regional Bank ETF and I went on the website
[00:31:43] and I went on the website of seven regional banks that have similar allocation to the
[00:31:48] KRE ETF than NYCB it doesn't mean that they are necessarily that close to NYCB in terms of
[00:31:55] asset but they'll be closer to them obviously than GP Morgan and they were all regional banks so
[00:32:01] I looked at First Horizons, MNT Bank, Cadence Bank, Sinovus Valley National Pinnacle Axos so Axos
[00:32:09] was the only bank among the group that I could find posted a yield that was relatively close to that of
[00:32:15] NYCB's offering with their my banking direct online and that yield was 3.3% all of the other
[00:32:23] banks were below 1.5% or just didn't post a yield so you had to contact them so clearly
[00:32:29] to me what that means is pretty simple the question would be why would a bank offer so
[00:32:35] much more in terms of yield than its competitors without a substantial amount of minimum deposit
[00:32:40] required because this is a minimum $500 so you don't need to have 10 like I don't know 100 grand
[00:32:47] or more which sometimes will be the prerequisite for those higher yield offers that the banks will
[00:32:54] do I think I mean the answer is pretty straightforward and let me know if you agree or not with
[00:32:59] that but I think they're just looking to attract and retain deposits which is the live blood of
[00:33:04] a bank so because a bank is fractional reserves so they use a big portion of those deposits to loan
[00:33:12] out and they'll typically be levered at least on a 10 to 1 basis so meaning for each dollar
[00:33:18] of deposit they'll have 10 cents on hand or in liquid assets what are your thoughts on that
[00:33:24] do you think it's probably what what I'm guessing here yeah it seems to be the only way you
[00:33:30] would offer a rate like this would be to try to attract more deposits I mean I wonder this would
[00:33:36] I wonder if this is on new accounts or all accounts like I can't imagine they're given that to existing
[00:33:41] but maybe I'm not I mean I'm sure if people are saying well I'm gonna leave if you don't
[00:33:45] give it to me they'll give it to you yeah they have almost no leverage in that position
[00:33:50] I mean you see you see a lot of Canadian banks they offer these rates but they're
[00:33:54] promotional like they only you only get that rate for like I know there were some that
[00:33:59] were offering like 6% but he only got it for like three months or something this by the looks of it
[00:34:04] seems to just be there's no promotional rate here like this is a rate you get which I mean the promotional
[00:34:09] rates would kind of be an incentive for just client acquisition and then you cut them back
[00:34:14] and kind of hope that they don't go elsewhere but this is like this seems like this isn't
[00:34:19] a promotional no obviously there's always that foot like you know that small print
[00:34:24] saying that rates are subject to change anytime but it's not like you said sometimes banks will
[00:34:30] offer like 5% for like three months or something like that exactly that was in the case and then
[00:34:35] to bring things into more context here when we last talked about NYCB they had just received a
[00:34:41] cash infusion of one billion from private funds including a fund led by Steve Mnuchin which
[00:34:46] was the former at Treasury Secretary under President Trump and it had shown that they
[00:34:52] had lost 7% of their deposit in the month period from early February to March 1st and that one billion
[00:35:00] in infusion was to shore up the liquidity but was still a fraction obvious of the deposit which
[00:35:06] stood at 77 billion at the time when we talked about it we both were a bit perplexed as to
[00:35:12] the viability of NYCB despite the cash infusion and all I can say right now is there's
[00:35:18] definitely smoke around this bank when you start seeing stuff like that we just need to know if the
[00:35:24] fire can be put out or not I think that's the real question and the last thing I'll mention here the
[00:35:29] stock went up when the deal was announced so that cash infusion on early March I think it was March
[00:35:35] 5th or March 4th but it's now down 16% since so it's not fared well at all despite having
[00:35:42] that one billion dollar infusion in it yeah I mean all I'll say is like even if even with them offering
[00:35:48] 5.55% I would I would never deposit money there it just seems like a potential nightmare waiting to
[00:35:54] happen but yeah that's all I have to say about NYCB you want to go on to MTY yeah yeah go ahead
[00:36:04] so yeah MTY it's relatively unknown I guess but it's actually like a huge franchising company
[00:36:10] here in Canada so I think they own like something like 7200 plus franchises stores that is so
[00:36:18] it has like a borderline overwhelming amount of brands I went on their website they got like
[00:36:22] 57 brands just in Canada and then there's more in the US I mean off the top of my head it's like
[00:36:28] brands like Mr. Sub, Papa Murphy's a lot of their brands are especially on the just like food
[00:36:37] end and maybe not like the frozen treat end are in shopping malls so I believe this company has quite
[00:36:42] a bit of exposure to shopping centers food courts like retail commercial strip malls things like that
[00:36:49] so the company has struggled over the last while so since 2017 the stock has total returns
[00:36:57] with reinvested dividends of a loss of three and a half three and a half percent
[00:37:01] so it was a solid post pandemic option and I think this is likely due to
[00:37:06] how badly shopping malls and things like that were impacted during the pandemic and then when
[00:37:11] lockdowns eased and you know people started to come back they started to see sales recover
[00:37:15] it does have some franchises that are not mall slash retail focused though so one of their largest
[00:37:20] brands would be Papa Murphy's I mean I don't know if you have a ton there but they're
[00:37:24] they're like few and far between here I think yeah I have no idea what that is yeah
[00:37:28] that's probably just kind if I were to guess kind of maybe just a run-of-the-mill pizza joint but
[00:37:35] same store sales are dropping pretty much everywhere so year-over-year basis they dip by 2.7% in Canada
[00:37:41] 3.6% in the US and 7.4% internationally overall system sales decreased by 2% company wide
[00:37:49] revenue on a year-over-year basis has declined by 2.7% and earnings per share by 5.33%
[00:37:56] the company opened 75 stores but closed 79 down so this is not really something you'd ever want to
[00:38:04] see in a franchisee is the fact that the store counts are shrinking but the one interesting
[00:38:09] thing I found is the company has quite a bit of exposure to frozen treats in the United States
[00:38:14] so the results in January like over the winter months are going to be weaker and
[00:38:20] I'll talk about this more in a bit in regards to the frozen treats but it seems to be we're
[00:38:24] paying debt pretty aggressively over the last while it's utilizing a big chunk of its cash
[00:38:28] flow towards debt reduction so it paid back about 34.6 million on the quarter and over 100 million
[00:38:35] on the year so their debt is now at 736 million so they're using free cash flow to pay out that
[00:38:43] you listening bce yeah exactly yeah they're actually when they cat the other thing you'll
[00:38:50] like too is they cap their distributions they only pay out a particular amount of distributions and
[00:38:54] after that they'll pay down debt so that might be useful as well yeah mm-hmm I hope I hope bce
[00:38:59] management it's listening because yeah sorry I have I'll have a segment when I'm recording with
[00:39:05] braden so for everyone next Monday where uh I'm not that flattering on management for bc I'll
[00:39:11] just yeah I just like I said I just filmed a massive video on it to going over the same
[00:39:16] things it's the outlook is not pretty but in terms of mty and this is kind of going back to what I said
[00:39:23] about the about the california situation is there was a lot of chatter on the conference call
[00:39:29] about higher minimum wages in california and the impact on the company so obviously you know
[00:39:36] this company I would say for the most part pretty much primarily hires minimum wage workers I mean
[00:39:42] food services they're all food services yeah that but another interesting element on the
[00:39:47] conference call was a question of the canadian versus a us consumer it was talked about quite a bit
[00:39:52] so they responded at this point that they're seeing almost no difference in the two in regards to
[00:39:58] their spending at quick service restaurants and if I were to have guessed I would have said the
[00:40:03] Canadian consumer would be weaker so it was a pretty interesting comment but again like a lot
[00:40:07] of these brands are cheaper food they're still gonna say yeah maybe it's an alternative for people
[00:40:14] right like maybe they would prefer to go to more expensive plays but now that they're getting
[00:40:19] a squeeze they have less money to spend they still want to go out that's like an easy alternative
[00:40:24] to go out like still eat out without breaking the bank at uh taco time have a night out at
[00:40:31] taco time yet well is it papa murphy's papa murphy's mr sub I only know of one mr sub that
[00:40:39] still exists in Calgary and it's been there forever but pretty much all of the other ones are gone
[00:40:43] but the one thing I didn't realize and again it's a frozen treat situation so apparently they have a
[00:40:49] ton of exposure to like ice creams and all that kind of stuff so the big you're getting me excited
[00:40:55] for a summer yeah but they the one big thing was the extreme cold spell in the United States
[00:41:04] they said that actually had a significant impact on their first quarter earnings so they have such
[00:41:09] large exposure to like frozen treats in the U.S. that because it got too cold it had a big impact
[00:41:15] on their earnings so I mean they say it's going to be a one-off situation we'll see I mean the
[00:41:20] one thing that's surprising to me the company has gone pretty much nowhere for seven plus years like I
[00:41:26] said I think it's lost something like three and a half percent but it's grown free cash flow per share
[00:41:31] by 82 percent over that time period and revenue is increased by 300 percent over that time period
[00:41:37] so I'm not exactly sure like what's going on if if it's just like that future outlook that
[00:41:43] is so bleak uh in terms of valuation it's trading at seven times its free cash flows
[00:41:49] so this is a 40 percent discount to what it would typically trade at on a historical basis so
[00:41:54] I mean it seems like there must be a ton of bearish you know outlook into this company
[00:42:00] I don't follow it that much yeah maybe it's maybe it's just kind of flying under the radar right
[00:42:05] it's not a huge company and that's what I have for a joint TCI listeners is the free cash
[00:42:09] will per share over the last 10 years and it's literally like almost like up to the right
[00:42:15] I think it's yeah you don't that's pretty amazing you rarely see that
[00:42:19] yeah and if you like one percent total return since that time so yeah that would have been
[00:42:24] 17 percent yeah 16.95 compounded annually free cash flow per share so they're doing something
[00:42:34] right yeah and then like it just hasn't really been rewarded at all I mean I don't get me wrong
[00:42:40] I have not looked into them very much so I don't know if this is a huge discount or whatever I
[00:42:46] I don't know enough about the company but it like if you were to look at revenue and free cash flow you
[00:42:50] would you would be like how is this stock only increased by 1 percent over seven years but
[00:42:56] it uh I thought it was interesting from the just the element of the Canadian consumer and
[00:43:00] you know just a retail environment they're still struggling a bit when it comes to you
[00:43:04] know shopping malls things like that uh just reduction in consumer spending overall so
[00:43:10] to summarize that up Canadians love their ice cream anytime of year the Americans need warm
[00:43:15] weather yeah that's a conclusion of all this it's not ice cream weather for eight months out of the
[00:43:21] year here so but we eat a lot of ice cream I mean I like ice cream even if it's cold outside once
[00:43:27] in a while obviously in the summer it's better but you know you get oftentimes it's been sitting
[00:43:32] at the grocery store for three months and it discounted anyways so it's perfect yeah
[00:43:36] yeah exactly no that's always a good overview definitely a company that we don't talk that
[00:43:41] often about but I think it's definitely one I'll probably just keep an eye on like you
[00:43:46] I was aware of them I just don't know them enough the free cash flow per share is impressive
[00:43:51] but there could be issues with the company that we I just don't know about so it's just
[00:43:56] I think it's important for people to know that's just one metric now we'll talk about
[00:44:00] a slightly bigger company you may have heard of it it's called JP Morgan it's uh also the biggest
[00:44:06] bank in the world just in case people were wondering so it's the largest of the system
[00:44:13] systematically important banks in the world so the G-CIP globally systematically important
[00:44:18] something like that I always have trouble pronouncing that with my French accent now
[00:44:23] I won't do a deep dive in the results because obviously it's um you know it's a U.S. company
[00:44:29] but I think it's still worth noting just because how large they are how important they are in
[00:44:35] in the U.S. by the world as well so it was Q1 2020 24 and I'll compare the numbers on a
[00:44:42] quarter over quarter basis I typically like to do that for banks because I think it shows
[00:44:46] a better picture of where they're at versus a year before especially right now where things
[00:44:51] change so much I mean a year before in the quarter a year ago they I think we're on the
[00:44:57] verge of making the first republic acquisition in the aftermath of the regional bank crisis in the U.S.
[00:45:03] so you know things do change quite a bit and that's uh that's a pretty big difference and on top of
[00:45:10] that I think they the year over year it's just yeah I know there's some seasonality to it but
[00:45:16] I think it's just a better thing to look at quarter over quarter here if we're just doing
[00:45:21] a snapshot so revenues were up 9 to 41.9 billion net income was a 44 to 13.4 billion in terms of
[00:45:31] segments the net income for consumer banking was flat investment banking was up 88 percent
[00:45:39] not surprising because the markets have been you know doing pretty well to start the year
[00:45:44] commercial banking was up 13 percent and wealth management was up 6 percent so same thing with
[00:45:49] wealth management here with the markets being up not surprised to see that being up net interest
[00:45:56] income as a whole was down 4 percent they now have 4.1 trillion in assets and for comparison
[00:46:02] royal bank and TD which are the two largest Canadian banks have about 2 trillion in assets so
[00:46:08] it's double the size of our two largest banks or let's just say it's our two largest banks
[00:46:13] together is equal JP Morgan oh that's combined yeah okay yeah so TD and royal is basically
[00:46:21] JP Morgan together oh yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah just uh it's just to give it people an idea of
[00:46:29] how big they are deposits were up 1 to 2.4 trillion provisions for credit losses were 32
[00:46:37] percent lower for the quarter and came in at 1.88 billion this is obviously the additional
[00:46:42] amount that was set aside for credit losses it brings a total set aside for loan losses on the
[00:46:49] balance sheet because when you look at a quarter it will be taken off it's on the income statement
[00:46:54] but then if you look at the balance sheet you actually have the total that's been set aside
[00:46:59] essentially bringing the previous quarters uh the total amount of money set aside minus what
[00:47:05] they've basically used to write off the bad loans and that total amount is 22.3 billion
[00:47:12] which is flat from the last quarter so clearly you know the last quarter they put more aside
[00:47:18] but the total amount is kind of flat when you factor in everything now
[00:47:23] Jamie Diamond has an annual letter as well Jamie Diamond the co of JP Morgan so
[00:47:29] the annual letter was really interesting I encourage anyone to read the annual letter
[00:47:34] from Jamie Diamond especially the first three paragraphs where he talks about the current
[00:47:38] geopolitical climate but also the state of the US economy here's a few takeaways that I found
[00:47:44] really interesting the US consumer is still spending and the markets still expect a soft
[00:47:49] landing he did say and I quote it is important to know that the economy is being fueled by
[00:47:55] large amount of government deficit spending in past stimulus there is also a growing need to
[00:48:00] spend on restructuring the global supply chain to transition to a greener economy the military
[00:48:06] and the need to reduce healthcare costs all of that may lead to stickier inflation and higher
[00:48:11] rates than market actually expect and he also there is also the unknown of massive quantitative
[00:48:18] tightening that has been happening to the pace of 900 billion a year and what impacts it will have
[00:48:24] on the economy and quantitative tightening because I know we might have some listeners
[00:48:29] are not quite sure what it is so essentially it's when a central bank so it's the opposite of a
[00:48:34] quantitative easing so when a central bank in terms of quantitative easing what they'll do is
[00:48:39] they'll go in the market and they'll buy assets so they will create money to go and buy those
[00:48:44] assets typically it'll be treasury bonds so US treasury bonds in the US and they'll put
[00:48:50] those bonds on their balance sheet while quantitative easing a quantitative tightening is
[00:48:56] the opposite of quantitative easing whereas the bank when it has bonds on their balance sheet
[00:49:01] they won't sell them what they'll do is they'll just let them roll off so once they mature they
[00:49:06] just don't replace them and it reduces the size of the central banks balance sheet
[00:49:12] so what he's saying is it's not the first time that quantitative tightening so QT has been
[00:49:17] happening but it's the first time that it's been happening to this extent and we just don't know
[00:49:22] what kind of repercussions this could have down the line the Ukraine Russia war as well as the
[00:49:28] Middle East conflict had the potential to disrupt global markets on top of their dreadful human
[00:49:34] costs there was an interesting section on the regional bank crisis that happened last year
[00:49:39] he said that after they bought first republic bank they thought that the crisis was over
[00:49:45] however he said that if the long end rates go over 6% and there is a recession there could be
[00:49:52] significant stress in the banking system and leverage companies such as real estate so the
[00:49:58] long hand is just means that the short end of the curve is basically the shortest end is
[00:50:04] the feds fund rate or the bank of Canada rate so it's what they set the longer end so it's the
[00:50:09] 510 even the 30 year in the US so the longer end if those rates keep going up they impact a lot of
[00:50:17] things like financing and this could have some pretty massive repercussions on the economy he mentioned
[00:50:23] that an increase of the long-term rate from 4 to 6% so 200 basis point increase would reduce asset
[00:50:30] values by 20% I'll just finish on this I want to unpack this because people may wonder like why
[00:50:36] is an raising to an increase in 2% going to lead to a reduced asset value of 20% well first of all
[00:50:44] let's look at bonds so for example let's say you buy a 10-year bond that yields 4% and it has a par
[00:50:50] value of $1000 so you pay $1000 the coupon yields 4% when you buy it shortly after you buy those
[00:50:57] bonds the yield goes up to 6% so the markets demand 6% for these bonds the new issuance of it
[00:51:04] well this means that the bond that you hold would drop around the third in value to equal the yield
[00:51:10] that is now in effect and the yield that people can get by just buying new issuances of bonds
[00:51:15] so if you need to sell the bond before maturity in this scenario you're going to take a significant
[00:51:20] loss on it and for real estate it's a similar thing for a potential buyer higher interest rate
[00:51:27] will increase the cost of service that debt so in the interest costs the loan amount will likely
[00:51:32] be smaller because the banks will want to underwrite a smaller amount because of you know the ability of
[00:51:39] the person who takes on or the company takes on to debt to repay that and obviously it's going to
[00:51:45] have the ripple effect if they're just able to offer less for a new property or property
[00:51:52] they're looking to buy it also puts pressure on the existing owner of that real estate to
[00:51:57] sell the building since higher rates will make the building less profitable or not at all if they are on
[00:52:02] variable rates or when the loan is up for refinancing so that's how you know just a change of a couple
[00:52:09] percentage point in the interest rates for longer term bonds can have a pretty big negative
[00:52:16] impact on the market that's kind of the gist of it any comments on that before we wrap things up
[00:52:22] I guess the one thing I would say and I can't remember the name of the bank now what is the
[00:52:25] bank that bought all those treasuries and svb yeah so value bank that would be a prime case of that they
[00:52:30] bought a ton of treasuries at rock bottom rates and then as rates rise those treasuries you know
[00:52:37] they pay the same coupon but the price has to be adjusted down so the yield is relatively comparable
[00:52:42] and then if you have people who want their money out of the bank you have to sell those
[00:52:46] treasuries at a loss which pretty much is what toasted them cooked them so no that was that's
[00:52:52] probably one of the best examples of this as of late which how much pressure it can put in a situation
[00:52:59] like that yeah exactly so I mean I think he must have some kind of data showing that there's like
[00:53:05] kind of a stress point around the six percent mark for him to actually explicitly say the six
[00:53:12] percent in a shareholder letter that that's a kind of level that could really create trouble
[00:53:18] we're not there yet but we've been talking about that you and I when we're texting like us you know
[00:53:24] the 10 year us treasury which tends to be a lot of the benchmark when people look at the longer term
[00:53:30] there's all with also the 30 and I think there's a 20 as well none of the less you know that one
[00:53:36] has been going up yeah ever since the cpi came in hotter and it's pushing on I think high
[00:53:43] fours right now if I remember correctly for the 10 year something like that yeah and
[00:53:47] they're typically like these bond you know yields they don't move that much but they're crazy volatile
[00:53:52] especially around periods like this especially around like inflation prints when you know they're
[00:53:58] so dependent on where rates are going to go you're going to see huge fluctuations in those prices
[00:54:03] yeah yeah exactly so um no that's about it I thought it was interesting um I think that's
[00:54:09] wraps it up for today thanks everyone for listening like I always say if you have time
[00:54:14] you don't give us a review on apple podcast or spotify five star we do appreciate it you can both
[00:54:20] find us on twitter I'm at fiat underscore iceberg and then is that stock trades underscore c8 anything
[00:54:26] else to have before we sign off nope thanks for listening everybody the Canadian investor podcast
[00:54:33] should not be construed as investment or financial advice the host and guest featured may own
[00:54:39] securities or assets discussed on this podcast always do your own due diligence or consult with
[00:54:45] a financial professional before making any financial or investment decisions

