How Important is Luck when Picking Stocks?
The Canadian InvestorMarch 25, 2024
364
00:50:2846.24 MB

How Important is Luck when Picking Stocks?

In this insightful episode of the Canadian Investor Podcast, your hosts, Simon and Braden, delve deep into the intriguing role of luck in the stock market and its potential effects on your investment outcomes. The duo explores the critical question of how much luck versus skill contributes to selecting winning stocks. 

Further, they shed light on the often misleading nature of historical returns, particularly focusing on the total returns of stocks that have shown exceptional performance over long periods. Join Simon and Braden as they provide a fresh perspective on evaluating past performance and the unpredictable element of luck in investing.

Check out our portfolio by going to Jointci.com

Want to learn more about Real Estate Investing? Check out the Canadian Real Estate Investor Podcast!

Apple Podcast - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Spotify - The Canadian Real Estate Investor 

Sign up for Finchat.io for free to get easy access to global stock coverage and powerful AI investing tools.

Register for EQ Bank, the seamless digital banking experience with better rates and no nonsense.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

[00:00:00] This is the Canadian Investor, where you take control of your own portfolio and gain the confidence

[00:00:07] you need to succeed in the markets.

[00:00:10] Hosted by Braden Dennis and Simon Belanger.

[00:00:15] The Canadian Investor Podcast welcome into the show, my name is Braden Dennis.

[00:00:22] As always joined by the Graceful, Simon Belanger.

[00:00:27] We are back in the saddle, you and I haven't sat down recorded in a couple weeks.

[00:00:32] I'm pretty pumped.

[00:00:34] I was just on a trip through Southern California and I had never been to California before.

[00:00:41] I had never even been to the West Coast either.

[00:00:43] You've never been there?

[00:00:44] I've never been there.

[00:00:45] No.

[00:00:46] As East Coasters it's just like so classic to go to Florida, 400 million times before you

[00:00:55] venture anywhere else in terms of going somewhere warm.

[00:00:58] But I liked it man, I mean there's what's not to like.

[00:01:03] The hype about the weather is real.

[00:01:05] You wake up and you're like, oh, it's perfect again.

[00:01:08] Great.

[00:01:09] I mean I've been to Vegas multiple times.

[00:01:12] I've been Vegas six or seven times but that's because I enjoyed playing poker but never

[00:01:18] made the trip to California although Vegas is very popular with Californians because I

[00:01:23] think you can drive there in like four hours or fly in like less than an hour.

[00:01:27] That's right, you can just drive and I actually played golf with some guys who are some younger

[00:01:33] guys and one of them goes to the University of...

[00:01:37] It was spring break so he goes to the University of Las Vegas and then he was back in San

[00:01:42] Diego to golf and I was at this plane with his two buddies.

[00:01:46] They're San Diego State D1 golfers who are going to be going pro.

[00:01:52] One of them just casually shot a 66 and I didn't even know like that's how good he was.

[00:01:59] I didn't even notice he was six under, you know through 14 holes.

[00:02:05] Like it was absolutely absurd.

[00:02:07] Just playing with that level of player and just kind of tapping into their mindset too

[00:02:13] just like so intense such a young age and so committed to the game.

[00:02:19] Like it was pretty...

[00:02:20] It was pretty awesome.

[00:02:21] Yeah I find it's interesting with athletes.

[00:02:24] I was like I've noticed that like the fast few years were...

[00:02:28] I find you have two types of personalities.

[00:02:31] You have the ones that are like so intense like you said they're so focused on it like

[00:02:35] it's your job like they'll do anything and then you have the other kind that are equally

[00:02:41] as successful but for them it's all about having fun and if they stop having fun the performance

[00:02:47] actually goes sideways.

[00:02:49] I don't know if you've noticed that too but there tends to be like in a lot of athletes

[00:02:53] it is like that you have these like you know like you said like super business focus and

[00:02:59] then the other ones that you know they put in the work but maybe differently a little

[00:03:02] bit but for them if they don't have fun they lose all interest and the performance

[00:03:08] goes sideways too.

[00:03:10] Yeah I think that makes sense right?

[00:03:12] Like it's like anything you know if we didn't have fun doing this podcast what do we...

[00:03:17] episode like 375 now?

[00:03:20] It's getting dark.

[00:03:22] If we didn't have fun doing it I mean we still wouldn't keep doing it.

[00:03:27] I got to tell you about someone I met, I'm out of conference and I meet this guy

[00:03:33] and I'm obviously going to keep an anonymous for many reasons.

[00:03:36] That's fair here.

[00:03:37] He was telling me about this fund that he was co-managing in 2007 was 5X Levert.

[00:03:47] It had 20 billion dollars but it was 5X Levert so the AUM was 100 billion in total.

[00:03:59] It blew up of course without much leverage going into 08.

[00:04:04] The entire fund was just a few hundred million dollars from 100 billion and this guy

[00:04:12] was telling me how he had to like save the fund, the other guy left and like he actually

[00:04:17] recouped it back to like 6 billion a.m. before he moved on.

[00:04:22] But dude leverage man, just listening to this guy's story.

[00:04:28] I sat down with him for probably two or three hours at this conference.

[00:04:34] I mean I was supposed to be meeting with all these people and I was just enthralled by

[00:04:37] this guy's story.

[00:04:39] We're sitting out on the patio at the Mary at Hotel and I'm just like learning about the

[00:04:44] ins and outs of the blow ups that happened in 07 and 08.

[00:04:49] And of course you and I know about them but to get them first hand experience from someone

[00:04:53] who was managing 100 billion dollars and Levert to the tits, it was, dude I was like shook.

[00:05:03] I was like shook for like 3-4 hours after that conference.

[00:05:06] It was pretty awesome.

[00:05:07] Yeah I mean leverage, leverage I mean it cuts both ways right?

[00:05:10] And especially in Canada where people they probably are the most familiar with being

[00:05:15] Levert if they purchase a home right?

[00:05:18] And I don't know about you maybe not as much because you're a bit younger but for me

[00:05:21] the perception I got is maybe, you know let's say maybe not the last two years but before

[00:05:27] that it was basically like you're stupid if you're not investing in real estate because

[00:05:33] you're essentially you know you're buying with debt, you're leveraging it up and it's

[00:05:38] boosting your profits.

[00:05:40] But it cuts both ways.

[00:05:41] It goes the other way around you can get wiped out because you're over levered and whether

[00:05:47] it's real estate, whether it's investments investing in stocks, levered obviously crypto

[00:05:53] there was even more craziness happening during the bull market where I was like I think

[00:05:58] we could get like 100 extra one something like that in certain sites but I think it's

[00:06:03] a good reminder yes you can really boost your profits if it goes well but at the same time

[00:06:08] you can also get wiped out so just be aware because leverage is it's fun when it works

[00:06:15] and it's a disaster when it doesn't.

[00:06:17] It certainly cuts both ways I think that's a good summarization of it.

[00:06:22] Dude have you lost California thing?

[00:06:26] Have you heard or at least know about the burger franchise in and out?

[00:06:31] I've heard of it but I've never been yeah.

[00:06:34] I think it's only in seven states on the Southwest coast of the US.

[00:06:39] People have seen the logo and many people have listened or have been there and tried it out.

[00:06:45] So the first one I've heard of that, I've heard it's very famous people go let's like

[00:06:49] thing you go try when you're in California.

[00:06:52] So the first one we saw in L.A. was near Hollywood like the day of the gravies or the Oscars

[00:07:00] or the gratitude.

[00:07:01] So out of touch.

[00:07:02] I think it would have been the Oscars recently.

[00:07:05] I mean, I don't know all I heard movies one right?

[00:07:07] Yes the Oscars.

[00:07:08] Yeah.

[00:07:09] Oh I heard and I didn't even watch any part of it is John Cena was almost naked that's

[00:07:14] the only thing I heard about it but you can't see John Cena has had it anyone know.

[00:07:21] So I expect this place to be jammed because it's the day of the Oscars in Hollywood so

[00:07:28] okay this place is jammed it's probably all tourists.

[00:07:33] I saw several more and one including like not a tourist the area North like inner downtown

[00:07:41] San Diego in kind of like not even like the best area.

[00:07:46] And I kid you not the drive through had 20 cars each line and there were two lines.

[00:07:55] The inside was like an absolute zoo.

[00:07:59] Chaos it's not like it's not tourists this is this is this is Pete this is real people

[00:08:04] who live there and I've never seen anything like it the hype around this burger joint

[00:08:12] the locals like stand by it they love it.

[00:08:17] And I suspect there is no better unit economics per location of any fast food concept in

[00:08:27] the world like I can't think of any location location based economics that compares to

[00:08:35] it anything close to it.

[00:08:37] I was amazed I couldn't believe it I thought the food was extremely average but people

[00:08:42] get you in and out.

[00:08:45] And it's pretty cheap like it's not it's still pretty cheap like fries or two bucks a

[00:08:50] burger's 350 like it's not expensive kind of reminds me of because I have family in

[00:08:55] Syracuse and we went to Chick-fil-A over there same kind of thing there's like two drive-through

[00:09:00] lanes and you think the line is going to be pretty long and within like 10 minutes

[00:09:07] you're like you have your food you've ordered and everything so they're pretty efficient

[00:09:11] I don't obviously haven't been to that one but it kind of reminds me of that the way

[00:09:15] you explain it.

[00:09:16] There's actually people on foot that come and take your order way way back yeah well they

[00:09:23] did the same yeah Chick-fil-A too so I think it's okay yeah so it sounds very similar yeah

[00:09:28] but it was so like America just the whole thing is just so America but dude I would love

[00:09:37] to see the financials of this company it's it's privately owned no plans of ever going

[00:09:43] public from my quick research I would love to see this thing go public and get a look

[00:09:50] under the hood because it is a real phenomenon it's it's unbelievable to be there and to

[00:09:57] look at it and to see people wait that long for a burger frankly I think is better at McDonald's

[00:10:04] but you know that might be a hot take yes I don't know for me I love my burgers just

[00:10:09] like chip trucks just because I find them like just you know the weird the meat doesn't taste

[00:10:15] weird it tastes like a burger at home and stuff like that and the fries are always the

[00:10:19] best I find a chip trucks but you can't replicate that as much as you would with a chain right

[00:10:26] and the fries are always hot when you get it from those things oh yeah yeah fries in an

[00:10:30] outward legitimately not even lukewarm they were cold so yeah I liked your first topic I have

[00:10:40] certainly my takes on this as well yeah I'm curious how you're gonna take this one yeah no and

[00:10:46] so this was inspired by Jerry who's one of our listeners from the UK big thank you for making

[00:10:52] the podcast international by the way obviously we have listeners around the world but the

[00:10:57] majorities in Canada and his question was sent around Nvidia and kind of the luck aspect around

[00:11:03] it but I am gonna take it a bit more as you know how much just luck have influence on

[00:11:08] investing and whether you have good returns or not and his question just to summarize it was

[00:11:15] you know how lucky were people who bought Nvidia around September October of 2022 when it kind

[00:11:21] of bought them because evaluations was still high at the time now I agree the valuation was in

[00:11:27] cheap in a traditional way with Nvidia trading in the high 40s on both a price of free castle and

[00:11:33] price to earnings basis however I will push back a little bit where that valuation if you look at

[00:11:39] Nvidia is more like the last five six years it was definitely towards the lower end but as a general

[00:11:46] rule I mean kind of everything tech was a bit down around that point in time it's pretty much when

[00:11:53] I think we bought them in 2022 for tech stocks and then everything getting started picking back up

[00:11:59] afterwards and my view is that luck there's a luck aspect obviously centered around that because

[00:12:07] you know around the launch of Chad GBT and that happened in November 30th 2022 so clearly people

[00:12:14] that bought it around the bottom September October you know some people may have read or had

[00:12:20] information that something like this may be coming soon but I think you know to know what impact it

[00:12:27] would actually have on Nvidia there's definitely a probably at least a decent or fairly large

[00:12:33] element of luck at least to the investors that were probably not as well informed as some other

[00:12:39] investors in the AI space and obviously being able to anticipate how much of you know kind of

[00:12:47] arms race I would say probably the best term to use here from the big tech company to build up

[00:12:53] the infrastructure needed to lose used old large language models and what impact it would have

[00:12:58] on Nvidia I think obviously that brought like that would have been very hard to foresee that I don't

[00:13:04] know what are your thoughts on that if you look at revision history on estimates the estimates

[00:13:13] skyrocketed right after this point when every analyst covering the name may have had insights into

[00:13:21] you know how cutting edge their GPUs were I think that that was actually consensus across

[00:13:27] anyone who studied the sector really well so it was it was well known that Nvidia was leading it

[00:13:34] especially with their compiler language called kuda that they were leading both the hardware and

[00:13:41] the software when it comes to GPUs and how it will help AI because that's the way GPUs work and

[00:13:49] it's able to do all these computations in parallel which is so much better than anything that anyone

[00:13:54] else had built so people knew that they were the industry leader but to your point there

[00:14:02] even people who studied the business in and out as their job you know covering Nvidia stock

[00:14:08] professionally as an analyst revision estimate like revision history on forward estimates sky

[00:14:15] so that was not consensus whatsoever that there was going to be that arms race that the data center

[00:14:21] was not only going to grow you know double year over year but double quarter over quarter like that was

[00:14:32] not well understood by anyone and so that's why the stock went nuts so if you're to look at it back then on a valuation perspective

[00:14:41] on a forward metric it was like incredibly incredibly cheap now where I don't think was lucky is people

[00:14:49] who saw those forward estimates and thought this stock is incredibly incredibly cheap even after

[00:14:59] it had like doubled last year it was only trading at high teens forward earnings and that was

[00:15:07] stocks like 3x since then so I don't think it's lucky that people who are really paying attention to the tech

[00:15:16] and paying attention to the story on the data center but of course hindsight 2020 now two years later

[00:15:22] like it's pretty easy to see that there was going to be a compute build out yeah I mean I think they were probably

[00:15:27] the way I probably see it and I'm a bit different than you here is they I think they were probably

[00:15:34] right for the wrong reasons I don't think they first saw how quickly it would build up but they knew

[00:15:40] that you know maybe they had an idea of it would be a big tailwind for them but the time frame obviously

[00:15:47] they they probably had more difficulties I mean I think we are seeing it with how the prices reacted

[00:15:52] and analysts and everyone so I think that's fair to say I mean I think just to extend I don't think

[00:15:58] anyone anticipated how quickly the build up and the demand would be for those chips so that's where

[00:16:04] I mean maybe the luck aspect is a little bit there but again if someone invested then with the idea

[00:16:09] of honing it for like five six seven years then I think the time aspect kind of negates the luck

[00:16:15] aspect a little bit because then you're looking at it from a longer time frame whereas someone who

[00:16:19] invested then and be like okay I'll invest for like a year because I think it's happening in a year

[00:16:25] I think there's a much larger element of luck there fair enough and just to continue on the luck aspect

[00:16:31] and maybe you'll disagree with me here but I did ask speaking of Chad GPT what is luck so they

[00:16:38] responded obviously a more a longer answer but the first sentence I think sums it up pretty well

[00:16:44] luck is a concept that refers to the experience of notably positive negative or improbable events

[00:16:50] so I think do you agree with the definition I think that's a pretty decent definition of luck

[00:16:56] yet to if I was to define luck or how would you yeah bring it GPT well I'll tell you what I think

[00:17:06] about luck later but the way I define luck is encountering unlikely events to the positive

[00:17:16] I know it says your positive negative or improbable I don't think of luck ever as like I got lucky

[00:17:22] and it was a negative outcome but maybe by definition are wrong I'm not sure I would yeah per I mean

[00:17:28] I know what you're saying for me I would place unlucky and lucky kind of the just the same it's just

[00:17:34] unlucky yeah exactly that's kind of the way I would see it but personally I don't think it's

[00:17:40] possible to completely eliminate luck when investing in a specific company no matter how well

[00:17:47] you know a specific company because there is always going to be an element of luck and an investment

[00:17:51] there's countless examples of that but I'll just say a couple here I don't know if you remember

[00:17:57] PG&E so Pacific Gas and Electric back in 2019 they had to declare bankruptcy because

[00:18:03] they were utility and they were held responsible for some forest fires in California and

[00:18:10] typically utility I mean is considered to be as safe as it gets right in terms of equity investment

[00:18:17] and that's a bit of a non-foreseen event obviously it was in a zero probability because there was a

[00:18:23] small chance I'm sure no matter all smell that it could happen but there is definitely probably a

[00:18:29] certain set of series of unfortunate events that kind of led to that and having them file for

[00:18:35] bankruptcy another one is you know companies that got completely crushed because of COVID-19

[00:18:41] and never fully recovered I know some are still theirs but if you look at for example the cruise ships

[00:18:48] they are so operating but they're definitely not in as good a shape as they were back then obviously

[00:18:54] some companies did very well some others didn't or on the other side companies that

[00:18:59] completely like took off and are still doing quite well today because of COVID-19 pandemic and how

[00:19:06] that's changed the way we work or interact and all these things so those are kind of example

[00:19:13] to me that there is definitely an element of lug but to be fair there's definitely companies that

[00:19:19] will be more dependent on lug components than others I mean I think farmers like biotech companies

[00:19:26] right that are testing out these new treatments I mean they can do all the research day one but

[00:19:31] until they start testing that I don't want to say like it's not a space I know super well but there

[00:19:37] has to be an element of lug that what they're studying and they're kind of the research they've

[00:19:43] done already will actually result in the expected or the hope results when they start doing all the

[00:19:50] testing so I think you know my view is that there's definitely an element of luck in every investment

[00:19:57] I think for some investment it's incredibly low but it's a non-zero impact there's just

[00:20:03] things that are on first seen or a very very small probability that most investors would not even

[00:20:09] place any probability on that can happen and obviously that's where I think the lug component comes in

[00:20:15] but I think you can also mitigate that through diversification not only through single asset class

[00:20:23] such as stocks so not only diversifying with just a lot of stocks but also different asset classes

[00:20:29] also allocating a smaller allocation if you think there's a bigger luck element tied to the

[00:20:34] returns of a company another example I can give is you know a few years back with Virgin Galaxy

[00:20:42] like a lot of people were almost like gambling on that if you'd like well I mean a lot of things

[00:20:47] had to go right for Virgin to do well in the future. That was the Chimath Spac right I think it was a

[00:20:53] Spac yeah is it Chimath Spac yeah Chimath Spac. He put out the four IPO ABCD I believe

[00:21:05] okay Virgin Galactic was one of them was okay and I mean that's an example but obviously I think

[00:21:14] the way I try to look at things is just assessing the probabilities of a unforeseen event or

[00:21:21] unprobable event whatever you want to call it because there are some events that whatever investment

[00:21:27] you're doing there are certain type of events that you probably are not assigning any probabilities

[00:21:34] and I try to sign even if it's a small probability to just you know the possibility of my investment

[00:21:41] not doing well or incredibly bad because you know let's say there's a 2% chance of like something

[00:21:48] unforeseen that affects completely their business and I try to incorporate that when I actually

[00:21:53] make an investment in a specific company if that makes sense. The book that I read last year the

[00:22:00] Morgan Housel one has a lot of good thoughts on yeah I was thinking about that one yeah yeah

[00:22:06] in general just like these extremely kind of random outcomes like random events that dictate so

[00:22:13] much of the future and are completely kind of unknowable yeah and impossible to predict.

[00:22:21] And I think there is that element of what we'll call luck or randomness or whatever you

[00:22:31] might want to call it that's definitely a factor and has a huge outcome on everything moving forward

[00:22:37] and read Morgan's book I mean there's so many countless examples. Oh yeah I did you know I know

[00:22:42] I did I mean to the listeners read the reading book it has lots of good thoughts on this

[00:22:49] that being said there are a couple examples here that I'm thinking of especially on the tech side

[00:22:56] whether it's AI and video or whatever else here the covid example moving forward a lot of stuff

[00:23:04] there is it a couple examples here where luck just or some random event just brought forward a

[00:23:13] lot of momentum to a trend that was already already happening. Whether it was e-commerce or AI

[00:23:20] there's these kind of outlier events or launches or things that happen that kind of just like five

[00:23:26] years happened in two days among the like long trend that it probably would have gotten there

[00:23:31] regardless just might have taken an extra five years. So there there is situations where investors

[00:23:38] can position themselves in a way for luck to happen to them or for outsized returns to happen

[00:23:45] to them or for a tail outcome so far out on a normal distribution curve to stumble upon their way

[00:23:53] like that's that's how I think about luck when it comes to investing. No yeah that's fair yeah and

[00:23:58] I mean maybe for me it's also because I come from a bit of a poker background right and you have very

[00:24:04] few situations where like I mean there are certain situations at the you know the situation is

[00:24:11] done and there's not really a luck element because you know all the cars have been dealt then as

[00:24:15] long as you don't fold you'll will you'll win the hand but you know when there's still cards remaining

[00:24:21] even if you have a 98% chance probability to win I've seen the 2% happens. You tend to remember

[00:24:30] the 2% when it happens against you don't really remember it when it happens in your favor but

[00:24:35] that's just a magic of the human brain but I just found it fascinating because Morgan's book

[00:24:42] I think is great because he if I remember correctly one of the things he says in the book is that

[00:24:47] there the probability of something bad happening is actually quite high because if you add in all

[00:24:53] the different probabilities that you know our hurricane might happen the pandemic might happen

[00:25:00] and major war might happen if you add all these things a solar flare might happen like if you

[00:25:04] had them all up the probability of one of them happening is actually quite high in any given year

[00:25:10] right and it's like if it if it can happen on a long enough time horizon it will happen

[00:25:16] it's like the thing for interstellar there's some law in there some space thing in there

[00:25:22] no and I think that this is this is directly correct luck in my mind around career or things

[00:25:33] that you want to make happen that don't rely on a lot of outside forces to go right or some macro

[00:25:42] perfect storm to occur I think of luck a lot differently in luck being surface area and the same

[00:25:50] way that a fisherman tries to catch fish is if you're trying to catch fish and you have

[00:25:58] a net set up on in like at your camp it's lucky if a fish swims in there during a in a short period

[00:26:06] of time just that it's just not very common but if you had a net that was 10 20 times bigger took more

[00:26:15] surface area and was positioned in a more effective spot you've now changed your odds of success and so

[00:26:26] that same way that that net has a larger like volumetric area for fish to swim through

[00:26:34] luck is a surface area in the fact that the more times you have luck being able to come across

[00:26:42] your plate then you can increase your odds of success and so when it comes to pure luck like say

[00:26:49] it's like rolling dice like there's nothing I can do really to change the odds of a standard normal

[00:26:57] set of dice dice if I roll them infinite amount of times I'll come up with a distribution curve

[00:27:03] of combinations of how I could roll two dice that's that's not going to change that's like straight

[00:27:09] up just true statistics and mathematical probability where luck becomes a little bit more abstract is

[00:27:18] oh he just got lucky you know like that type of saying or that might be true but what people don't

[00:27:25] see in the background is that person expanding their surface area of luck to happen so this is

[00:27:34] where it becomes like you know luck in a more you know abstract version of it and luck in the

[00:27:41] like true probably probabilistic statistic version of it if I roll two dice 10,000 times.

[00:27:48] No and that's no that's I think that's that's a good way to put it and I mean it's maybe it's

[00:27:54] also like the way our brains sink right for me it's always like I don't know why I just come back

[00:27:59] to thinking probabilities too that's kind of what drives me a whole lot so I always try to assign

[00:28:05] a probability just based on that but I guess the the last thing I'll mention is someone could do like

[00:28:10] you know we're thinking about a company they could do all the research they can have the best thesis

[00:28:15] everything makes sense everything lines up and you know something that's out of their control or

[00:28:21] on first scene kind of happens that puts out puts that out to the side right but I think at the

[00:28:27] end of the day if you do the work and you have conviction in what you believe I think more often

[00:28:32] than not luck won't play a big part in it I think that's probably the way I would see it yeah.

[00:28:39] Moving on to investors that maybe got very lucky if they were able to hold on to hold on

[00:28:49] the whole time this is speaking of luck yeah there's this graphic that's been going around

[00:28:55] on LinkedIn which has been it shows nine companies and their total return since February 2004

[00:29:07] and so that data is from February 2004 to February 2024 so as of you know month from now a month

[00:29:16] ago as a recording so 20 years of performance and it basically shows how ten thousand dollars

[00:29:25] invested in a bunch of stocks evolved over time and it shows a bunch of huge mega winners that you

[00:29:32] made boat loads of money on on just a ten thousand dollar investment and these types of backtest

[00:29:39] performances are not always particularly useful because hindsight is 2020 and

[00:29:48] survivorship bias is a real problem when it comes to backtesting. Survivorship bias

[00:29:56] kind of throws out a lot of the value you can learn from backtesting and so why am I bringing up this

[00:30:06] graphic that's been going viral because I actually looked into the list and I thought that there was

[00:30:12] something more interesting than just looking at the list right off the gate so then the companies are

[00:30:20] Apple which which would be total return so this includes dividends your ten thousand dollar

[00:30:26] investment would have turned into five hundred and twenty seven thousand eight hundred and eighty

[00:30:30] seven dollars over over half a million dollars not going to read out the amounts of all of them

[00:30:36] but in second place then video third place monster beverage intuitive surgical booking holdings netflix

[00:30:44] old dominion amazon and regeneron so many of those companies you probably have heard of or no

[00:30:52] for those who are not familiar with old dominion or or regeneron there's probably the two smaller

[00:30:57] names old dominion is a trucking company it's very similar to a tf i international Brad Jacobs who

[00:31:03] started odfl expi logistics beast absolute beast was a Brad Jacobs that's our old dominion hold on

[00:31:10] let me let me fact check that founder old dominion was a Brad Jacobs I'm not sure yeah I know he did the

[00:31:19] he's a roll up he's a roll up guy now he did expi logistics maybe not old dominion fry land

[00:31:24] anyways trekking company regeneron is a pharmaceutical company that use the description of it

[00:31:30] is a lot of big words that my brain doesn't understand this list though and not if you look at a lot

[00:31:38] of other companies that are just outside of that list you have axon you have dominoes pizza

[00:31:46] this like some names that you'd be very shocked on their huge performance of the last 20 years

[00:31:52] so what can we learn from this what can we learn from the names that are on this list so when

[00:31:57] when you look at this list you have any first thoughts right when you see it among the mega winners

[00:32:03] over the last 20 years i mean to me i just find it a bit dangerous because a lot of beginner investor

[00:32:10] will see this and then they'll try to get these kind of returns and not fully understand and then

[00:32:16] they'll navigate around like penny stocks to try and get the next you know apple because it was

[00:32:23] worth way less back in 2004 i don't know what the price per share was back then i guess split

[00:32:29] adjusted but i think that's the first thing that comes to mind because i know as well as you do

[00:32:34] when i see this i'm like this is just a tiny fraction of the whole investment or stock investing

[00:32:40] story since february of 2024 really good point many of these companies have split many times over

[00:32:48] and that can be quite dangerous because casual beginner investors like

[00:32:57] apple is now you know hundreds of dollars used to be like four cents these companies did not IPO

[00:33:04] as penny stocks they IPOed typically somewhere between ten and fifty bucks back in the day split

[00:33:11] up a million times in the math works out to to four cents a share so first first point of

[00:33:17] being highly misled to you know beginner investors now i agree with you there's not a whole lot

[00:33:23] to learn there and then i thought let's look at apple and video intuitive surgical arguably amazon

[00:33:32] and dominoes pizza as well axon for sure which by the way since the last 22.8 years has returned

[00:33:41] 500 oh sorry 53,000% 792 category 32% since since inception even tesla let's look at those names okay

[00:33:53] they have all combined a hardware and software mode together okay apple for sure

[00:34:04] and video for sure intuitive surgical for sure arguably amazon at least bridging the gap between tech

[00:34:11] and physical axon for sure dominoes pizza connect they were the first like hey what if we just

[00:34:18] digitize pizza tesla for sure with the the tech inside the car what about regenerate

[00:34:25] regenerates these big words that i don't understand so you know like six out of the top 12 names

[00:34:32] right there all share a really common characteristic around bridging a physical product with a

[00:34:42] software product that makes it really really sticky look at the bloomberg terminal that's another

[00:34:48] a classic example there are all of these really enduring products that have owned the gates

[00:34:57] and the software they've oh they've been gatekeepers of the the ecosystem and own that internal

[00:35:04] software i mean look no further than apple like that's the prime example axon's been leading the

[00:35:10] way with their hardware and software together for police forces so that's one lesson that i learned

[00:35:17] from right away and i'm going to be thinking about more and more as i go i even i really like uber

[00:35:24] stock right now the prices run up so much i should have bought it when i told you i really liked it

[00:35:28] before but uh i didn't because i didn't that's another company connecting the physical uh and

[00:35:36] digital it's using software can connect the physical world Airbnb's another example okay so that's

[00:35:42] that's one thing i thought of number two they have all faced intense drawdowns drawdowns that would

[00:35:51] make you feel like these companies would be left for dead multiple times over their story i just

[00:35:56] went on finchat price target i typed in a bunch of the tickers and press drawdown setting

[00:36:03] there they've all been in situations where they lose more than half their value sometimes all

[00:36:07] the same time oh one oh eight march 2000 yeah maybe yeah they didn't quite get half off there but

[00:36:14] they they they faced at least 25 percent drawdowns there many have faced over 80 percent drawdowns

[00:36:22] some of them have faced more than 90 percent drawdowns during that time multiple times including

[00:36:29] booking oldings many of them have looked left for dead a couple of times during that story

[00:36:37] the market has hated them multiple times and it's not just like one blacks one event happened

[00:36:43] like there have been multiple times in their in this 20 year period where a lot of these companies

[00:36:49] didn't look interesting at all and were on massive massive drawdowns and only the investors who got to

[00:36:57] ride that huge wealth wave were the ones that focused on the fundamentals and not the narrative

[00:37:03] look at meta last year look up maybe what's happening with google this year i don't know

[00:37:09] and so it's important to kind of focus on the fundamentals the real structure of these businesses

[00:37:17] you know are they really intact or is the market just selling them off in a major way so

[00:37:22] that's obviously a lot harder when it's happening it's a lot harder to swim against the current

[00:37:27] when it's happening but you have to remind yourself all of these companies that have had huge success

[00:37:34] have had severe intense drawdowns so you have so you know what you're signing up for right like

[00:37:42] it's not the norm for these companies to cagrad a 30 bag like at a 30 bag or

[00:37:50] without any volatility that is not the norm it is exactly the opposite of that and so

[00:37:56] i think it's instructive to just learn from which companies have done well what are some of the

[00:38:00] characteristics are of them and that if you are going to be a long-term investor in individual

[00:38:06] equities or the broader index you're signing up for volatility and you're signing up for extreme

[00:38:13] drawdowns including many of them over 80 percent yeah and i think that's a good point because it's

[00:38:21] you know people will see these graphs and again i kind of come back to newer investors and they're

[00:38:26] like oh wow like if i invested in apple you know i'd be rich by now if i put $10,000 or 20k back then

[00:38:35] and they see that and i think it's really important to remind that remind people that you need to

[00:38:40] understand the business pretty well to be able to hold the company for that long and not panic

[00:38:47] when there's a drawdown because it's much easier said than done if you zoom out 20 years you see

[00:38:52] these returns like oh like it's you know look at this investor it's easy for him or her like they

[00:38:58] invested in that they got great returns just because of that one stock well i'm sure there was

[00:39:03] a lot more people than invested in apple and a few years down the line they just panic and they sold

[00:39:11] it and they didn't hang on to it and have all these amazing returns it's much easier like

[00:39:17] having gone through drawdowns i think we've both been through some significant drawdowns for names

[00:39:22] we hold i think we were pretty good at you know staying the course if we have conviction in it

[00:39:27] for me obviously it's not a company but bitcoin i've seen quite a few drawdowns there

[00:39:32] it's easier said than done i'll just say that like uh sometimes people will see these graphs and

[00:39:37] they just think like oh i just need to do that well make sure you do the the work because when

[00:39:42] it's happening you know fear is a powerful motivator it it is fear is a powerful motivator and fear

[00:39:50] is a powerful storyteller fear is the most powerful emotion a storyteller can kind of use and what

[00:39:58] that really relates to is the stories that people create around companies the stories that are

[00:40:03] crafted around companies direction one way or another and it usually starts with a little bit of

[00:40:12] price sentiment right it usually starts with a little bit of negative price sentiment i mean

[00:40:19] in the last like month i don't have any really particularly hot takes beyond what i've had about

[00:40:24] google which i think that change is bad for every monopoly and i adjusted my portfolio that way

[00:40:31] but in the last two months we have seen everyone say there is cultural rot inside of google

[00:40:38] it is a hell scape woke rotting company sundar needs to be replaced immediately

[00:40:46] with a fire every engineer that's out there right size the cost structure stop innovating this

[00:40:52] company sucks too sundar is gonna pull off a deal with apple for seary he's a genius this company's

[00:41:00] amazing they're gonna win a i like literally in a month and a half i've seen that unfold on

[00:41:09] most public forums a lot of professional discussions everywhere you look man like podcasts so

[00:41:17] the narrative to be driven by i've seen it and i've heard it yeah yes so the narrative can be

[00:41:23] twisted and spun very quickly here's a little hot hot take okay

[00:41:28] company culture doesn't change two months company culture takes a long long time and i actually

[00:41:35] do think that these big tech companies do need a shake up and that just because the stock rally

[00:41:41] a little bit doesn't mean that they've fixed their issues that's that's the story both on the upside

[00:41:46] and the downside the price can drive no i i think yeah i think that's definitely fair point i don't

[00:41:52] have much to say about that because i agree i mean it's uh yeah the market can be people

[00:41:58] can panic based on headlines people can be really short term focus obviously like uh you know

[00:42:04] i think there's at least questions to be asked if you're talking about alphabet and google because

[00:42:08] i remember when chat gpt came out people were panicking that google search would just you know

[00:42:15] go away and google would be a shell of itself and obviously search is still there will it happen

[00:42:21] eventually maybe maybe not who knows but one thing that was happening at the time and i think it's

[00:42:28] shifted a little bit is people were like oh well wait till google comes out with their AI tools

[00:42:34] because they've been working on that and i think now the perception is kind of not sure right they're

[00:42:41] not sure really where google is that because there's been a few uh a few events that uh they've

[00:42:48] high profile events where they didn't show as well as people expected but i think it's it's good

[00:42:53] to just take a step back and you know maybe if you have a position just take a step back wait till

[00:43:01] things settle down and then make a decision whether you want to continue uh being an investor in the

[00:43:05] business and if you want to invest in the business maybe it's just good to take a step back less

[00:43:10] this does settle a little bit in the next uh you know few quarters see how things progress because

[00:43:16] this space you know as well as probably anyone it moves very quickly so in six months you can get a

[00:43:23] whole lot of information on where things are going i find it mind blowing by the way i'm long google

[00:43:31] it's like three percent position so with that context in mind i am mind blown how that organization

[00:43:39] could have released a product that was so riddled with trying to be very careful when it comes to

[00:43:50] woke identity politics yet the same team will launch a completely faked completely false

[00:44:03] Gemini computer vision demo where they showed like i remember that one you know the one yeah

[00:44:09] it was completely faked yeah i think that's a one where they like basically

[00:44:14] text to image but they basically was in the AI doing it it's damn that kind of made sure it did it

[00:44:21] that way type of deal right yeah yeah they they shopped a video pretty well to make it look like it was

[00:44:27] you know very impressive and i think that the demo that they're that they did

[00:44:34] i think that their tech will get there soon but the fact that they were so behind

[00:44:40] that they had to release a fake video promoting it and then apologize on it it's just like

[00:44:48] what are you guys doing man like that's these are the same people who are so careful

[00:44:54] to release anything that says anything racist on their AI yet they will just fake a video like

[00:45:03] same people i don't understand how that character type exists i think it's probably i mean it's hard

[00:45:10] to say that it argues not a culture thing but at the same time it's funny because they

[00:45:16] were taking their time it looked like google i mean everything i was hearing i think you as well

[00:45:21] like prior to 2022 or prior to november 22 is like all google's really like ahead of every one

[00:45:28] or just making sure everything is good they want to be sure that everything is like tip top you know

[00:45:36] perfectly not perfect all but all but none everything is well done before they release it and then

[00:45:42] open a i came out with chat gpt and it's almost like they panicked and then it was like okay

[00:45:47] screw this we're just really saying products and not you know not doing the proper testing like

[00:45:53] i just don't understand why they couldn't find a happy middle maybe i think what's pressure

[00:45:59] investor pressure yeah but at the same time i mean i think they are probably seeing now that

[00:46:04] you know potential clients would use this technology they'd rather wait a little bit and get

[00:46:10] a product that's actually good then you know these botched presentation or botched products like

[00:46:19] i don't know about you but i'd rather wait a little longer and you know have a product that's

[00:46:25] amazing than you know trying something in it's completely crap and it just doesn't fit the bill

[00:46:31] i don't know to me there's definitely a reputation thing for google right now where they can i don't

[00:46:38] think they can mess up again on this day i have to make sure they get a ride going forward because

[00:46:43] after a couple times or two three times of messing it up i don't think people will give them that

[00:46:47] much leeway going for yep agreed thanks for listening to the pod folks we really appreciate

[00:46:55] you tuning in we are here every monday and thursday has the show been going on i've been out of

[00:47:03] the loop the show has been going on yeah we had had a guest on monday last monday financial planner

[00:47:12] i think the feedback was really good especially the timing was quite good with that cvc investigation

[00:47:18] on big banks just pushing shilling products on consumers that are high fees and booze bank profits

[00:47:27] so it was a good timing to see what i just guess that we actually talked a little bit about it but

[00:47:33] we had recorded like a my three four weeks before so it was kind of funny that we had

[00:47:38] touched on the subject of high fees and these like advisors and air quotes at banks that are putting

[00:47:45] people in two percent two point five percent mutual funds that are performing poorly so no it was

[00:47:51] really good interview good feedback that had so far too i would say we should pencil in for next

[00:47:58] episode discussing that you and i were texting back and forth just like canadians who want to start

[00:48:05] investing the worst thing they can do is walk into large game bank and say hey take my money

[00:48:12] yeah probably the worst thing they can do i mean i can't i can't think of that many worse ideas

[00:48:18] and it's too bad because people end up going there trusting their banks right like they think they

[00:48:23] they well like i think most people when they go to a bank and they want to talk about investing

[00:48:28] and stuff like that i think they go in with the expectation that sure the bank will make some money

[00:48:33] like they'll get a fee that's fine they're providing a service but not with the expectation that

[00:48:38] the bank will try to essentially screw them over that's basically what they're doing yeah right

[00:48:45] well that does it for this episode folks so much to discuss we'll have to be yeah

[00:48:53] i'm here monday's dan kent is discussing earnings with simon every Thursday you can support the

[00:48:59] show at join tci.com you get my portfolio get simones portfolio get dance portfolio update every

[00:49:07] single month and you get this podcast on video as well as if you are a real estate investor

[00:49:13] if you are iying buying your first home if you are currently a homeowner and thinking about

[00:49:21] you know diversifying the portfolio with real estate as well you should listen to the Canadian

[00:49:26] real estate investor podcast there they're probably over 150 episodes at this point now i have to

[00:49:33] check i think so yeah they've been cooking it i just listened to an episode this morning so was

[00:49:39] them going over some recent surveys about the economic prospect for Canadians spoiler learned it's

[00:49:45] not good it's pretty good how grim was that i can just picture dan yeah being pretty grim about it

[00:49:52] the barren chief then yeah dan foge the barren chief so if you're into that real estate wise and

[00:49:59] you have not yet checked out the show that is at the Canadian real estate investor podcast on your

[00:50:05] podcast player see you in a few days take care robot the Canadian investor podcast should not

[00:50:10] be construed as investment or financial advice the host and guest featured may own securities

[00:50:16] or assets discussed on this podcast always do your own due diligence or consult with a financial

[00:50:23] professional before making any financial or investment decisions